Visualizing the invisible tie: Linking parent-child neural synchrony to parents' and children's attachment representations.

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Trinh Nguyen, Melanie T Kungl, Stefanie Hoehl, Lars O White, Pascal Vrtička
{"title":"Visualizing the invisible tie: Linking parent-child neural synchrony to parents' and children's attachment representations.","authors":"Trinh Nguyen, Melanie T Kungl, Stefanie Hoehl, Lars O White, Pascal Vrtička","doi":"10.1111/desc.13504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is a central tenet of attachment theory that individual differences in attachment representations organize behavior during social interactions. Secure attachment representations also facilitate behavioral synchrony, a key component of adaptive parent-child interactions. Yet, the dynamic neural processes underlying these interactions and the potential role of attachment representations remain largely unknown. A growing body of research indicates that interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) could be a potential neurobiological correlate of high interaction and relationship quality. In this study, we examined whether interpersonal neural and behavioral synchrony during parent-child interaction is associated with parent and child attachment representations. In total, 140 parents (74 mothers and 66 fathers) and their children (age 5-6 years; 60 girls and 80 boys) engaged in cooperative versus individual problem-solving. INS in frontal and temporal regions was assessed with functional near-infrared spectroscopy hyperscanning. Attachment representations were ascertained by means of the Adult Attachment Interview in parents and a story-completion task in children, alongside video-coded behavioral synchrony. Findings revealed increased INS during cooperative versus individual problem solving across all dyads (𝛸<sup>2</sup>(2) = 9.37, p = 0.009). Remarkably, individual differences in attachment representations were associated with INS but not behavioral synchrony (p > 0.159) during cooperation. More specifically, insecure maternal attachment representations were related to higher mother-child INS in frontal regions (𝛸<sup>2</sup>(3) = 9.18, p = 0.027). Conversely, secure daughter attachment representations were related to higher daughter-parent INS within temporal regions (𝛸<sup>2</sup>(3) = 12.58, p = 0.006). Our data thus provide further indication for INS as a promising correlate to probe the neurobiological underpinnings of attachment representations in the context of early parent-child interactions. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: We assessed attachment representations using narrative measures and interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) during parent-child problem-solving. Dyads including mothers with insecure attachment representations showed higher INS in left prefrontal regions. Dyads including daughters with secure attachment representations showed higher INS in right temporo-parietal regions. INS is a promising correlate to probe the neurobiological underpinnings of attachment representations in the context of parent-child interactions, especially within the mutual prediction framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13504","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a central tenet of attachment theory that individual differences in attachment representations organize behavior during social interactions. Secure attachment representations also facilitate behavioral synchrony, a key component of adaptive parent-child interactions. Yet, the dynamic neural processes underlying these interactions and the potential role of attachment representations remain largely unknown. A growing body of research indicates that interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) could be a potential neurobiological correlate of high interaction and relationship quality. In this study, we examined whether interpersonal neural and behavioral synchrony during parent-child interaction is associated with parent and child attachment representations. In total, 140 parents (74 mothers and 66 fathers) and their children (age 5-6 years; 60 girls and 80 boys) engaged in cooperative versus individual problem-solving. INS in frontal and temporal regions was assessed with functional near-infrared spectroscopy hyperscanning. Attachment representations were ascertained by means of the Adult Attachment Interview in parents and a story-completion task in children, alongside video-coded behavioral synchrony. Findings revealed increased INS during cooperative versus individual problem solving across all dyads (𝛸2(2) = 9.37, p = 0.009). Remarkably, individual differences in attachment representations were associated with INS but not behavioral synchrony (p > 0.159) during cooperation. More specifically, insecure maternal attachment representations were related to higher mother-child INS in frontal regions (𝛸2(3) = 9.18, p = 0.027). Conversely, secure daughter attachment representations were related to higher daughter-parent INS within temporal regions (𝛸2(3) = 12.58, p = 0.006). Our data thus provide further indication for INS as a promising correlate to probe the neurobiological underpinnings of attachment representations in the context of early parent-child interactions. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: We assessed attachment representations using narrative measures and interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) during parent-child problem-solving. Dyads including mothers with insecure attachment representations showed higher INS in left prefrontal regions. Dyads including daughters with secure attachment representations showed higher INS in right temporo-parietal regions. INS is a promising correlate to probe the neurobiological underpinnings of attachment representations in the context of parent-child interactions, especially within the mutual prediction framework.

将无形的纽带可视化:将亲子神经同步与父母和子女的依恋表征联系起来。
依恋理论的一个核心原则是,依恋表征的个体差异会组织社会互动中的行为。安全的依恋表征还能促进行为同步,这是亲子间适应性互动的关键组成部分。然而,这些互动背后的动态神经过程以及依恋表征的潜在作用在很大程度上仍不为人所知。越来越多的研究表明,人际神经同步(INS)可能是高互动和关系质量的潜在神经生物学相关因素。在这项研究中,我们考察了亲子互动过程中的人际神经和行为同步性是否与父母和孩子的依恋表征有关。共有 140 名父母(74 名母亲和 66 名父亲)和他们的孩子(5-6 岁;60 名女孩和 80 名男孩)参与了合作与单独解决问题的过程。通过功能性近红外光谱超扫描对额叶和颞叶区域的 INS 进行了评估。通过对父母进行成人依恋访谈,对儿童进行故事完成任务,以及对行为同步性进行视频编码,来确定依恋表征。研究结果表明,在合作与单独解决问题的过程中,所有二人组的依恋表征都有所增加(𝛸2(2) = 9.37, p = 0.009)。值得注意的是,在合作过程中,依恋表征的个体差异与 INS 相关,但与行为同步性无关(p > 0.159)。更具体地说,不安全的母亲依恋表征与额叶区域较高的母子 INS 有关(𝛸2(3) = 9.18,p = 0.027)。相反,在颞区,安全的女儿依恋表征与较高的女儿-父母 INS 有关(𝛸2(3) = 12.58,p = 0.006)。因此,我们的数据进一步表明,INS 是探究早期亲子互动中依恋表征的神经生物学基础的一个很有前景的相关指标。研究亮点:在亲子问题解决过程中,我们使用叙事测量和人际神经同步(INS)评估了依恋表征。包括具有不安全依恋表征的母亲在内的二人组在左前额叶区域显示出更高的 INS。包括具有安全依恋表征的女儿在内的二人组在右侧颞顶叶区域显示出更高的 INS。在亲子互动中,尤其是在相互预测框架下,INS是探究依恋表征的神经生物学基础的一个很有前景的相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信