The TOPOS study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tim Sebastian, Stefano Barco, Davide Voci, Michael Lichtenberg, Oliver Schlager, Houman Jalaie, Rick de Graaf, Christian Erbel, Alexander Massmann, Marc Schindewolf, David Spirk
{"title":"The TOPOS study.","authors":"Tim Sebastian, Stefano Barco, Davide Voci, Michael Lichtenberg, Oliver Schlager, Houman Jalaie, Rick de Graaf, Christian Erbel, Alexander Massmann, Marc Schindewolf, David Spirk","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: We aimed to study the long-term safety and efficacy of oblique venous stents for post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with iliac vein compression. <i>Patients and methods</i>: In the multinational, prospective, single-arm TOPOS study, PTS patients scheduled for endovascular therapy with the sinus-Obliquus<sup>®</sup> stent and optional distal extension with the sinus-Venous<sup>®</sup> or sinus-XL Flex<sup>®</sup> stent were enrolled at eight European vascular centres between October 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was primary stent patency at 24 months, and secondary outcomes included the clinical course of PTS (Villalta score, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score [rVCSS], Visual Analog Scale [VAS] of pain), quality of life changes (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire, CIVIQ-20), and device-related complications. <i>Results</i>: We enrolled 60 patients (mean age 46±15 years, 68% women, 13% active ulcers): 80% required stent extension (70% below the inguinal ligament). The primary patency rate at 24 months was 80.7% (95%CI 68.1-90.0%); it was higher in patients without vs. those with stent extension (90.9% vs. 78.3%, p=.01). Compared to baseline, the Villalta, rVCSS, pain VAS, and CIVIQ-20 decreased by a median of 8 (interquartile range (IQR): 4-11), 5 (IQR: 3-7), 3 (IQR: 2-5), and 17 (IQR: 6-22) points, respectively; p<.001 for all parameters. Overall, 9 events of acute stent occlusion, 4 symptomatic stent stenosis, and 1 pulmonary embolism occurred. We did not observe major bleeding events or contralateral thrombosis. <i>Conclusions</i>: Endovascular treatment with the oblique stent and optional stent extension was safe and resulted in high patency rates at 24 months. The reduction in PTS severity was substantial and persisted over 2-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to study the long-term safety and efficacy of oblique venous stents for post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with iliac vein compression. Patients and methods: In the multinational, prospective, single-arm TOPOS study, PTS patients scheduled for endovascular therapy with the sinus-Obliquus® stent and optional distal extension with the sinus-Venous® or sinus-XL Flex® stent were enrolled at eight European vascular centres between October 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was primary stent patency at 24 months, and secondary outcomes included the clinical course of PTS (Villalta score, revised Venous Clinical Severity Score [rVCSS], Visual Analog Scale [VAS] of pain), quality of life changes (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire, CIVIQ-20), and device-related complications. Results: We enrolled 60 patients (mean age 46±15 years, 68% women, 13% active ulcers): 80% required stent extension (70% below the inguinal ligament). The primary patency rate at 24 months was 80.7% (95%CI 68.1-90.0%); it was higher in patients without vs. those with stent extension (90.9% vs. 78.3%, p=.01). Compared to baseline, the Villalta, rVCSS, pain VAS, and CIVIQ-20 decreased by a median of 8 (interquartile range (IQR): 4-11), 5 (IQR: 3-7), 3 (IQR: 2-5), and 17 (IQR: 6-22) points, respectively; p<.001 for all parameters. Overall, 9 events of acute stent occlusion, 4 symptomatic stent stenosis, and 1 pulmonary embolism occurred. We did not observe major bleeding events or contralateral thrombosis. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment with the oblique stent and optional stent extension was safe and resulted in high patency rates at 24 months. The reduction in PTS severity was substantial and persisted over 2-year follow-up.

TOPOS 研究。
背景:我们旨在研究斜静脉支架治疗血栓后综合征(PTS)伴髂静脉压迫的长期安全性和有效性。患者和方法在跨国、前瞻性、单臂 TOPOS 研究中,2016 年 10 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,8 家欧洲血管中心招募了计划使用 sinus-Obliquus® 支架进行血管内治疗并可选择使用 sinus-Venous® 或 sinus-XL Flex® 支架进行远端延伸的 PTS 患者。主要结果是 24 个月时的主要支架通畅率,次要结果包括 PTS 的临床过程(Villalta 评分、修订后的静脉临床严重程度评分 [rVCSS]、疼痛视觉模拟量表 [VAS])、生活质量变化(慢性静脉功能不全生活质量问卷,CIVIQ-20)和设备相关并发症。结果:我们共招募了 60 名患者(平均年龄为 46±15 岁,68% 为女性,13% 有活动性溃疡):80%的患者需要支架延伸(70%在腹股沟韧带以下)。24 个月时的主要通畅率为 80.7%(95%CI 68.1-90.0%);未进行支架扩展的患者与进行支架扩展的患者相比,主要通畅率更高(90.9% 对 78.3%,P=.01)。与基线相比,Villalta、rVCSS、疼痛 VAS 和 CIVIQ-20 分别下降了中位数 8(四分位间距 (IQR):4-11)、5(IQR:3-7)、3(IQR:2-5)和 17(IQR:6-22)分;p 结论:使用斜支架和可选支架延伸进行血管内治疗是安全的,24 个月后的通畅率很高。PTS严重程度大幅降低,并在两年的随访中持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信