[The declining power of the human touch in the digital world.]

Q3 Medicine
Giampaolo Collecchia
{"title":"[The declining power of the human touch in the digital world.]","authors":"Giampaolo Collecchia","doi":"10.1701/4246.42229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans are social creatures, and touch is the most primitive form of relationship. In the context of the traditional medical examination, touch, palpation, is essential to diagnose or suspect pathology. But it is not only an issue of semeiotics. The physician's ability to examine a body through his or her hands is at the heart of the doctor-patient relationship. Moreover, we have been witnessing for many years to the progressive downgrading of the objective examination in clinical practice. First, the obsolescence of interaction with the patient due to the lure of diagnostic technology, then the \"social distancing\" of Covid-19 and, finally, the expansion of telemedicine has contributed to the distancing of caregivers from patients. The same technology that tends to distance doctor and patient provides haptic wearable devices that can digitize touch and open up application scenarios that are still largely unexplored. These, however, cannot replace human interaction. What can we do to preserve the culture of physical contact in the doctor-patient relationship? As always, awareness is the first step. The technology that separates us from patients is not the real problem. It is only when it becomes an end instead of a means that we risk losing centuries of medical tradition. It is therefore necessary to strike a balance between using technology and ensuring that health care professionals maintain a central role in providing emotional support and understanding to patients. Such issues should be introduced early in the medical student's training. In the course of study, not only the mechanisms of disease should be taught, but also how to approach care with compassion, empathy and \"human touch\". In any case, even if digital culture eventually prevails, it is necessary to practice at least \"touch\" as interpersonal sensitivity, gentleness, and the ability to intercept the other's state of mind and respect it.</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4246.42229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans are social creatures, and touch is the most primitive form of relationship. In the context of the traditional medical examination, touch, palpation, is essential to diagnose or suspect pathology. But it is not only an issue of semeiotics. The physician's ability to examine a body through his or her hands is at the heart of the doctor-patient relationship. Moreover, we have been witnessing for many years to the progressive downgrading of the objective examination in clinical practice. First, the obsolescence of interaction with the patient due to the lure of diagnostic technology, then the "social distancing" of Covid-19 and, finally, the expansion of telemedicine has contributed to the distancing of caregivers from patients. The same technology that tends to distance doctor and patient provides haptic wearable devices that can digitize touch and open up application scenarios that are still largely unexplored. These, however, cannot replace human interaction. What can we do to preserve the culture of physical contact in the doctor-patient relationship? As always, awareness is the first step. The technology that separates us from patients is not the real problem. It is only when it becomes an end instead of a means that we risk losing centuries of medical tradition. It is therefore necessary to strike a balance between using technology and ensuring that health care professionals maintain a central role in providing emotional support and understanding to patients. Such issues should be introduced early in the medical student's training. In the course of study, not only the mechanisms of disease should be taught, but also how to approach care with compassion, empathy and "human touch". In any case, even if digital culture eventually prevails, it is necessary to practice at least "touch" as interpersonal sensitivity, gentleness, and the ability to intercept the other's state of mind and respect it.

[数字世界中人情味的衰退]
人类是社会性动物,而触摸是最原始的关系形式。在传统的医学检查中,触摸、触诊对于诊断或怀疑病变是必不可少的。但这不仅仅是一个半生物学的问题。医生通过双手检查身体的能力是医患关系的核心。此外,多年来,我们一直目睹着客观检查在临床实践中逐渐降级。首先,由于诊断技术的诱惑,与病人的互动过时了,然后是 Covid-19 的 "社会距离",最后是远程医疗的扩展,这些都造成了护理人员与病人之间的距离。拉开医患距离的技术还包括触觉可穿戴设备,这些设备可以将触觉数字化,并开辟了在很大程度上尚未开发的应用场景。然而,这些都无法取代人与人之间的互动。我们能做些什么来保护医患关系中的身体接触文化呢?一如既往,提高认识是第一步。将我们与病人隔开的技术并不是真正的问题。只有当技术成为目的而不是手段时,我们才有可能失去几个世纪以来的医学传统。因此,有必要在利用技术与确保医护人员在为病人提供情感支持和理解方面保持核心作用之间取得平衡。这些问题应在医科学生接受培训的早期就提出来。在学习过程中,不仅要讲授疾病的机理,还要讲授如何以同情心、同理心和 "人情味 "来对待护理工作。在任何情况下,即使数字文化最终占了上风,也有必要至少将 "触摸 "作为人际关系的敏感性、温和性以及拦截和尊重对方心理状态的能力来练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信