{"title":"The neuropsychological evaluation of face identity recognition","authors":"Angélique Volfart , Bruno Rossion","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Facial identity recognition (FIR) is arguably the ultimate form of recognition for the adult human brain. Even if the term prosopagnosia is reserved for exceptionally rare brain-damaged cases with a category-specific abrupt loss of FIR at adulthood, subjective and objective impairments or difficulties of FIR are common in the neuropsychological population. Here we provide a critical overview of the evaluation of FIR both for clinicians and researchers in neuropsychology. FIR impairments occur following many causes that should be identified objectively by both general and specific, behavioral and neural examinations. We refute the commonly used dissociation between perceptual and memory deficits/tests for FIR, since even a task involving the discrimination of unfamiliar face images presented side-by-side relies on cortical memories of faces in the right-lateralized ventral occipito-temporal cortex. Another frequently encountered confusion is between specific deficits of the FIR function and a more general impairment of semantic memory (of people), the latter being most often encountered following anterior temporal lobe damage. Many computerized tests aimed at evaluating FIR have appeared over the last two decades, as reviewed here. However, despite undeniable strengths, they often suffer from ecological limitations, difficulties of instruction, as well as a lack of consideration for processing speed and qualitative information. Taking into account these issues, a recently developed behavioral test with natural images manipulating face familiarity, stimulus inversion, and correct response times as a key variable appears promising. The measurement of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the frequency domain from fast periodic visual stimulation also appears as a particularly promising tool to complete and enhance the neuropsychological assessment of FIR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224000800/pdfft?md5=e0bb941c9d8555b85cd4ebde9da0537a&pid=1-s2.0-S0028393224000800-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224000800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Facial identity recognition (FIR) is arguably the ultimate form of recognition for the adult human brain. Even if the term prosopagnosia is reserved for exceptionally rare brain-damaged cases with a category-specific abrupt loss of FIR at adulthood, subjective and objective impairments or difficulties of FIR are common in the neuropsychological population. Here we provide a critical overview of the evaluation of FIR both for clinicians and researchers in neuropsychology. FIR impairments occur following many causes that should be identified objectively by both general and specific, behavioral and neural examinations. We refute the commonly used dissociation between perceptual and memory deficits/tests for FIR, since even a task involving the discrimination of unfamiliar face images presented side-by-side relies on cortical memories of faces in the right-lateralized ventral occipito-temporal cortex. Another frequently encountered confusion is between specific deficits of the FIR function and a more general impairment of semantic memory (of people), the latter being most often encountered following anterior temporal lobe damage. Many computerized tests aimed at evaluating FIR have appeared over the last two decades, as reviewed here. However, despite undeniable strengths, they often suffer from ecological limitations, difficulties of instruction, as well as a lack of consideration for processing speed and qualitative information. Taking into account these issues, a recently developed behavioral test with natural images manipulating face familiarity, stimulus inversion, and correct response times as a key variable appears promising. The measurement of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the frequency domain from fast periodic visual stimulation also appears as a particularly promising tool to complete and enhance the neuropsychological assessment of FIR.
人脸身份识别(FIR)可以说是成人大脑识别的终极形式。即使 "面容失认症"(prosopagnosia)这一术语仅用于成年后突然丧失特定类别的面容识别能力的极少数脑损伤病例,但在神经心理学人群中,面容识别能力的主观和客观损害或困难也很常见。在此,我们将为神经心理学的临床医生和研究人员提供一份关于 "前视障碍 "评估的重要综述。发生情感障碍的原因很多,应通过一般和特殊的行为和神经检查来客观地识别。我们驳斥了通常使用的将感知和记忆障碍/测试区分开来的做法,因为即使是一项涉及辨别并排呈现的陌生人脸图像的任务,也依赖于右侧腹枕部-颞叶皮层对人脸的记忆。另一个经常遇到的混淆是特定的 FIR 功能缺陷和更普遍的(对人的)语义记忆障碍,后者最常在前颞叶受损后出现。在过去的二十年里,出现了许多旨在评估FIR的计算机化测试,本文对此进行了综述。然而,尽管这些测试具有不可否认的优势,但它们往往受到生态学的限制、教学的困难,以及缺乏对处理速度和定性信息的考虑。考虑到这些问题,最近开发的自然图像行为测试将人脸熟悉程度、刺激倒置和正确反应时间作为一个关键变量进行操作,似乎很有前途。通过快速周期性视觉刺激测量频域内的脑电图(EEG)活动似乎也是一种特别有前途的工具,可用于完成和加强对 FIR 的神经心理学评估。