Analytical Performance Evaluation of a Digital Real-Time PCR for Quantifying Major BCR::ABL1 Transcripts

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Soo Jung Lee, Jong-Mi Lee, Ari Ahn, Sung-Eun Lee, Yuna Hong, Gun Dong Lee, Hyun-Woo Song, Min-Sik Song, Seung-Shick Shin, Myungshin Kim, Yonggoo Kim
{"title":"Analytical Performance Evaluation of a Digital Real-Time PCR for Quantifying Major BCR::ABL1 Transcripts","authors":"Soo Jung Lee,&nbsp;Jong-Mi Lee,&nbsp;Ari Ahn,&nbsp;Sung-Eun Lee,&nbsp;Yuna Hong,&nbsp;Gun Dong Lee,&nbsp;Hyun-Woo Song,&nbsp;Min-Sik Song,&nbsp;Seung-Shick Shin,&nbsp;Myungshin Kim,&nbsp;Yonggoo Kim","doi":"10.1002/jcla.25034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Accurate quantification of the <i>BCR::ABL1</i> transcripts is essential for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. This study evaluated the newly developed digital real-time PCR method, Dr. PCR, as an alternative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) for MRD detection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The performance of Dr. PCR was assessed using reference and clinical materials. Precision, linearity, and correlation with qRT-PCR were evaluated. MRD levels detected by Dr. PCR were compared with qRT-PCR, and practical advantages were investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Dr. PCR detected MRD up to 0.0032%<sup>IS</sup> (MR4.5) with excellent precision and linearity and showed a strong correlation with qRT-PCR results. Notably, Dr. PCR identified higher levels of MRD in 12.7% (29/229) of patients than qRT-PCR, including six cases of MR4, which is a critical level for TKI discontinuation. Dr. PCR also allowed for sufficient <i>ABL1</i> copies in all cases, while qRT-PCR necessitated multiple repeat tests in 3.5% (8/229) of cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study provides a body of evidence supporting the clinical application of Dr. PCR as a rapid and efficient method for assessing MRD in patients with CML under the current treatment regimen.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":"38 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.25034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.25034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accurate quantification of the BCR::ABL1 transcripts is essential for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. This study evaluated the newly developed digital real-time PCR method, Dr. PCR, as an alternative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) for MRD detection.

Methods

The performance of Dr. PCR was assessed using reference and clinical materials. Precision, linearity, and correlation with qRT-PCR were evaluated. MRD levels detected by Dr. PCR were compared with qRT-PCR, and practical advantages were investigated.

Results

Dr. PCR detected MRD up to 0.0032%IS (MR4.5) with excellent precision and linearity and showed a strong correlation with qRT-PCR results. Notably, Dr. PCR identified higher levels of MRD in 12.7% (29/229) of patients than qRT-PCR, including six cases of MR4, which is a critical level for TKI discontinuation. Dr. PCR also allowed for sufficient ABL1 copies in all cases, while qRT-PCR necessitated multiple repeat tests in 3.5% (8/229) of cases.

Conclusion

Our study provides a body of evidence supporting the clinical application of Dr. PCR as a rapid and efficient method for assessing MRD in patients with CML under the current treatment regimen.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于定量主要 BCR::ABL1 转录本的数字实时 PCR 的分析性能评估。
背景:酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗后,BCR::ABL1转录本的精确定量对于监测慢性髓性白血病(CML)的可测量残留疾病(MRD)至关重要。本研究评估了新开发的数字实时 PCR 方法 Dr. PCR,将其作为 MRD 检测的反转录-PCR(qRT-PCR)替代方法:PCR的性能进行了评估。方法:使用参考和临床材料对 Dr. PCR 的性能进行了评估,并对其精确度、线性度以及与 qRT-PCR 的相关性进行了评价。将PCR博士检测到的MRD水平与qRT-PCR进行了比较,并对其实际优势进行了研究:结果:PCR 博士检测到的 MRD 高达 0.0032%IS (MR4.5),精确度和线性度都非常好,而且与 qRT-PCR 结果有很强的相关性。值得注意的是,与 qRT-PCR 相比,PCR 博士在 12.7% 的患者(29/229)中发现了更高水平的 MRD,其中包括 6 例 MR4,而 MR4 是停用 TKI 的关键水平。PCR博士还在所有病例中检测到了足够的ABL1拷贝,而qRT-PCR在3.5%(8/229)的病例中需要多次重复检测:我们的研究为 Dr. PCR 的临床应用提供了大量证据,它是评估当前治疗方案下 CML 患者 MRD 的一种快速有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信