Adaptation to Living at High Altitude in Patients with COPD. Comparative Study of Exercise Capacity and Ventilatory Variables between Patients Residing at High and Low Altitudes in the Andes.

Abstract

González-García, Mauricio and Luis Ernesto Téllez. Adaptation to living at high altitude in patients with COPD. Comparative study of exercise capacity and ventilatory variables between patients residing at high and low altitudes in the Andes. High Alt Med Biol. 00:000-000, 2024. Introduction: Although some variables related to oxygen transport and utilization such as ventilation, pulmonary vascular responses to hypoxia, heart rate (HR), cardiac output, hemoglobin (Hb), and oxygen saturation (SpO₂) are used to compare adaptation to altitude between populations, peak oxygen consumption (VO₂) constitutes an integrative measure of total oxygen transport that may reflect successful adaptation to altitude. We designed this study to make a direct comparison of VO₂ in a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients residing at high altitude (Bogotá, Colombia: 2,640 m) (COPD-HA) and those living at low altitude (Bucaramanga, Colombia: 959 m) (COPD-LA). Methods: All patients performed a CPET with measurements of VO₂, minute ventilation (V_E), HR, oxygen pulse (VO₂/HR), ventilatory equivalents (V_E/VCO₂), and SpO₂. Unpaired T-test or Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparisons between COPD-HA and COPD-LA. Results: We included 71 patients with COPD, 53 COPD-HA, and 18 COPD-LA. There were no differences between groups in age, sex, or forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The means ± SD of Hb, g/dl was slightly higher in COPD-HA (15.9 ± 1.9 vs. 14.7 ± 1.8, p = 0.048), without differences in VO₂, % pred (71.6 ± 17.9 vs. 69.0 ± 17.0, p = 0.584), VO₂/HR, % pred (92.1 ± 22.0 vs. 89.7 ± 19.8, p = 0.733) or V_E/MVV, % (75.5 ± 14.1 vs. 76.5 ± 14.3, p = 0.790) at peak exercise between groups. Median (IQR) of V_E/VCO₂ nadir [38.0 (37.0-42.0) vs. 32.5 (31.0-39.0), p = 0.005] was significantly higher, and SpO₂, % at rest [88.0 (86.0-91.0) vs. 95.0 (94.0-96.0), p < 0.001] and at peak exercise [84.0 (77.0-90.0) vs. 93.0 (92.0-95.0), p < 0.001] were significantly lower in COPD-HA. Conclusions: Despite higher desaturation at rest and during exercise in COPD-HA, there were no differences in VO₂ peak between COPD-HA and COPD-LA, suggesting a potential altitude adaptation in those patients chronically exposed to hypoxia.