Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Pub Date : 2015-08-01
Craig Campbell, Grahame Caldwell, Penelope Coates, Robert Flatman, Andrew Georgiou, Andrea Rita Horvath, Que Lam, Hans Schneider
{"title":"Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results.","authors":"Craig Campbell, Grahame Caldwell, Penelope Coates, Robert Flatman, Andrew Georgiou, Andrea Rita Horvath, Que Lam, Hans Schneider","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ineffective test follow-up is a major source of harm for patients around the world. Unreliable communication from medical laboratories (henceforth termed 'laboratories') to clinicians of results that represent critical or significant risk to patients (collectively termed 'high risk results') is a contributing factor to this problem. Throughout Australasia, management practices for such results vary considerably. The recommendations presented in this document are based on best practice derived from the published literature and follow consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. These recommendations were created to harmonise Australasian practices by guiding laboratories in the design and implementation of safe and effective communication procedures for managing high risk results which require timely notification. </p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"36 3","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4745612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ineffective test follow-up is a major source of harm for patients around the world. Unreliable communication from medical laboratories (henceforth termed 'laboratories') to clinicians of results that represent critical or significant risk to patients (collectively termed 'high risk results') is a contributing factor to this problem. Throughout Australasia, management practices for such results vary considerably. The recommendations presented in this document are based on best practice derived from the published literature and follow consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. These recommendations were created to harmonise Australasian practices by guiding laboratories in the design and implementation of safe and effective communication procedures for managing high risk results which require timely notification.

高风险化验结果的管理与沟通共识声明》(Consensus Statement for the Management and Communication of High Risk Laboratory Results)。
无效的检查跟踪是世界各地患者受到伤害的一个主要原因。医学实验室(以下简称 "实验室")与临床医生之间关于对患者具有关键或重大风险的结果(统称为 "高风险结果")的不可靠沟通是导致这一问题的一个因素。在整个澳大拉西亚地区,对此类结果的管理方法大相径庭。本文件中提出的建议是基于已发表文献中的最佳实践,并在广泛征求利益相关者的意见后得出的。这些建议旨在通过指导实验室设计和实施安全有效的沟通程序来管理需要及时通知的高风险结果,从而统一澳大拉西亚的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Biochemist Reviews
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信