Comparing the effectiveness of verb-focused and particle-focused exercise formats on the recall and recognition of phrasal verbs

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Brian Strong, Paul Leeming
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of verb-focused and particle-focused exercise formats on the recall and recognition of phrasal verbs","authors":"Brian Strong, Paul Leeming","doi":"10.1177/13621688241239058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phrasal verbs are important for successful communication and yet are incredibly challenging for language learners. The current study compared two exercise formats for the learning of phrasal verbs. One format draws attention to the verb, while the other brings into focus the particle. In the verb-focused format, students were asked to guess the missing verb before receiving feedback. In the particle-focused format, they were told to guess the missing particle before feedback was presented. The results of a cued-recall test showed that the recall of phrasal verbs was enhanced more effectively in the particle-focused format than in the verb-focused format, although this advantage diminished after one week. A multiple-choice test revealed no significant difference between the two methods in terms of their impact on the recognition of phrasal verbs. The current study also aimed to test the prediction of the episodic recollection hypothesis, which specifies that memory of the initial guess plays a critical role in the subsequent recall of the correct answer. It was also found that asking students to recall their initial guess moderated their performance in the posttest. Overall, the findings of the current study suggest that the particle-focused format boosts the memory of phrasal verbs and that to minimize the adverse effects of proactive interference, it is vital for students to remember their errors. This means that teachers would be advised to focus on exercises that provide the verb and encourage guessing of the particle.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241239058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phrasal verbs are important for successful communication and yet are incredibly challenging for language learners. The current study compared two exercise formats for the learning of phrasal verbs. One format draws attention to the verb, while the other brings into focus the particle. In the verb-focused format, students were asked to guess the missing verb before receiving feedback. In the particle-focused format, they were told to guess the missing particle before feedback was presented. The results of a cued-recall test showed that the recall of phrasal verbs was enhanced more effectively in the particle-focused format than in the verb-focused format, although this advantage diminished after one week. A multiple-choice test revealed no significant difference between the two methods in terms of their impact on the recognition of phrasal verbs. The current study also aimed to test the prediction of the episodic recollection hypothesis, which specifies that memory of the initial guess plays a critical role in the subsequent recall of the correct answer. It was also found that asking students to recall their initial guess moderated their performance in the posttest. Overall, the findings of the current study suggest that the particle-focused format boosts the memory of phrasal verbs and that to minimize the adverse effects of proactive interference, it is vital for students to remember their errors. This means that teachers would be advised to focus on exercises that provide the verb and encourage guessing of the particle.
比较以动词为中心的练习形式和以短语为中心的练习形式对短语动词的记忆和识别的效果
短语动词对于成功的交流非常重要,但对于语言学习者来说却极具挑战性。本研究比较了两种学习短语动词的练习形式。其中一种练习形式让学生关注动词,而另一种练习形式则让学生关注微词。在以动词为重点的练习中,学生被要求在收到反馈之前猜出缺少的动词。而在以质点为重点的形式中,则是让学生在得到反馈之前猜出缺失的质点。提示回忆测试的结果表明,与以动词为重点的形式相比,以质点为重点的形式更有效地提高了短语动词的回忆能力,尽管这种优势在一周后有所减弱。多项选择测试表明,两种方法对短语动词识别的影响没有显著差异。本研究还旨在检验 "外显回忆假说 "的预测结果。"外显回忆假说 "认为,对最初猜测的记忆在随后回忆正确答案时起着关键作用。研究还发现,要求学生回忆最初的猜测会调节他们在后测中的表现。总之,本次研究的结果表明,以微粒为重点的形式能促进学生对短语动词的记忆,而且为了尽量减少主动干扰的不利影响,学生记住自己的错误至关重要。这就意味着,建议教师将重点放在提供动词和鼓励猜测词缀的练习上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信