Improved efficient physics-based computational modeling of regional wave-driven coastal flooding for reef-lined coastlines

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Camila Gaido-Lasserre , Kees Nederhoff , Curt D. Storlazzi , Borja G. Reguero , Michael W. Beck
{"title":"Improved efficient physics-based computational modeling of regional wave-driven coastal flooding for reef-lined coastlines","authors":"Camila Gaido-Lasserre ,&nbsp;Kees Nederhoff ,&nbsp;Curt D. Storlazzi ,&nbsp;Borja G. Reguero ,&nbsp;Michael W. Beck","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coastal flooding affects low-lying communities worldwide and is expected to increase with climate change, especially along reef-lined coasts, where wave-driven flooding is particularly prevalent. However, current regional modeling approaches are either insufficient or too computationally expensive to accurately assess risks in these complex environments. This study introduces and validates an improved computationally efficient and physics-based approach to compute dynamic wave-driven regional flooding on reef-lined coasts. We coupled a simplified-physics flood model (SFINCS) with a one-dimensional wave transformation model (XBeach-1D). To assess the performance of the proposed approach, we compared its results with results from a fully resolving two-dimensional wave transformation model (XBeach-2D). We applied this approach for a range of storms and sea-level rise scenarios for two contrasting reef-lined coastal geomorphologies: one low relief area and one high relief area. Our findings reveal that SFINCS coupled with XBeach-1D generates flood extents comparable to those produced by XBeach-2D, with a hit rate of 92%. However, this method tends to underpredict the flood extent of weaker, high-frequency storms and overpredict stronger, low-frequency storms. Across scenarios, our approach overpredicted the mean flood water depth, with a positive bias of 7 cm and root mean square difference of 15 cm. Offering approximately 100 times greater computational efficiency than its two-dimensional XBeach counterpart, this flood modeling technique is recommended for wave-driven flood modeling in scenarios with high computational demands, such as modeling numerous scenarios or undertaking detailed regional-scale modeling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 102358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000453/pdfft?md5=073cd4d1aec1bbca05f5ad012460f98b&pid=1-s2.0-S1463500324000453-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal flooding affects low-lying communities worldwide and is expected to increase with climate change, especially along reef-lined coasts, where wave-driven flooding is particularly prevalent. However, current regional modeling approaches are either insufficient or too computationally expensive to accurately assess risks in these complex environments. This study introduces and validates an improved computationally efficient and physics-based approach to compute dynamic wave-driven regional flooding on reef-lined coasts. We coupled a simplified-physics flood model (SFINCS) with a one-dimensional wave transformation model (XBeach-1D). To assess the performance of the proposed approach, we compared its results with results from a fully resolving two-dimensional wave transformation model (XBeach-2D). We applied this approach for a range of storms and sea-level rise scenarios for two contrasting reef-lined coastal geomorphologies: one low relief area and one high relief area. Our findings reveal that SFINCS coupled with XBeach-1D generates flood extents comparable to those produced by XBeach-2D, with a hit rate of 92%. However, this method tends to underpredict the flood extent of weaker, high-frequency storms and overpredict stronger, low-frequency storms. Across scenarios, our approach overpredicted the mean flood water depth, with a positive bias of 7 cm and root mean square difference of 15 cm. Offering approximately 100 times greater computational efficiency than its two-dimensional XBeach counterpart, this flood modeling technique is recommended for wave-driven flood modeling in scenarios with high computational demands, such as modeling numerous scenarios or undertaking detailed regional-scale modeling.

改进礁石衬砌海岸线区域波浪驱动型沿海洪水的高效物理计算模型
沿海洪水影响着世界各地的低洼社区,而且预计会随着气候变化而增加,特别是在海浪驱动洪水尤为普遍的礁石海岸。然而,目前的区域建模方法要么不足,要么计算成本太高,无法准确评估这些复杂环境中的风险。本研究介绍并验证了一种计算效率更高的基于物理的方法,用于计算暗礁海岸的动态波浪驱动区域洪水。我们将简化物理洪水模型(SFINCS)与一维波浪转换模型(XBeach-1D)相结合。为了评估所提出方法的性能,我们将其结果与完全解析的二维波浪转换模型(XBeach-2D)的结果进行了比较。我们将这种方法应用于两种不同的礁石海岸地貌:一种是低地形区,另一种是高地形区。我们的研究结果表明,SFINCS 与 XBeach-1D 结合生成的洪水范围与 XBeach-2D 生成的洪水范围相当,命中率为 92%。但是,这种方法往往对较弱的高频风暴的洪水范围预测不足,而对较强的低频风暴的洪水范围预测过高。在所有情况下,我们的方法都高估了平均洪水水深,正偏差为 7 厘米,均方根差为 15 厘米。这种洪水建模技术的计算效率比二维 XBeach 高出约 100 倍,建议用于计算要求较高的波浪驱动型洪水建模,如众多情景建模或进行详细的区域尺度建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean Modelling
Ocean Modelling 地学-海洋学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
19.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信