Information simplification and default choices improve financial decisions: A credit card statement experiment.

IF 1.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Jose M. Ortiz , Lucas I. Teixeira , Natália N.L. Falcão , Erika A. Soki , Raquel M. Almeida
{"title":"Information simplification and default choices improve financial decisions: A credit card statement experiment.","authors":"Jose M. Ortiz ,&nbsp;Lucas I. Teixeira ,&nbsp;Natália N.L. Falcão ,&nbsp;Erika A. Soki ,&nbsp;Raquel M. Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We run a between-subjects experiment to test how better-organized credit card statements, written in simplified language and default choices, help people make better financial decisions. Participants were shown either a standard (control treatment), a simplified, or a simplified with anchored information statement of a credit card bill. While observing the bill, they were asked factual and decision-making questions. We find higher correct response rates and debt repayment levels in our simplified information and anchored treatments compared to the control treatment. Simplified information increases repayment levels by 3.13 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 9.18 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt. We also provide evidence on the effect of default pre-filling payment choices on debt repayment. Participants were given a choice box filled with either the number zero or 100 % of the amount due. We find higher debt repayment levels when the default choice is the total amount due. Overall, a higher default amount increases repayment levels by 14.56 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 3.14 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We run a between-subjects experiment to test how better-organized credit card statements, written in simplified language and default choices, help people make better financial decisions. Participants were shown either a standard (control treatment), a simplified, or a simplified with anchored information statement of a credit card bill. While observing the bill, they were asked factual and decision-making questions. We find higher correct response rates and debt repayment levels in our simplified information and anchored treatments compared to the control treatment. Simplified information increases repayment levels by 3.13 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 9.18 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt. We also provide evidence on the effect of default pre-filling payment choices on debt repayment. Participants were given a choice box filled with either the number zero or 100 % of the amount due. We find higher debt repayment levels when the default choice is the total amount due. Overall, a higher default amount increases repayment levels by 14.56 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 3.14 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt.

信息简化和默认选择可改善财务决策:信用卡账单实验。
我们进行了一项主体间实验,以检验以简化语言和默认选项编写的、条理更清晰的信用卡账单如何帮助人们做出更好的财务决策。我们向参与者展示了标准(对照处理)、简化或带有锚定信息的简化信用卡账单。在观察账单的同时,我们向他们提出了一些事实性和决策性问题。我们发现,与对照组相比,简化信息和锚定处理的正确回答率和债务偿还水平更高。当参与者能够偿还全部债务时,简化信息平均提高了 3.13% 的偿还水平;当参与者只能偿还全部债务的 60% 时,简化信息平均提高了 9.18%。我们还提供了默认预填付款选择对债务偿还影响的证据。参与者会在选择框中填入零或到期金额的 100%。我们发现,当默认选择为到期总金额时,债务偿还水平较高。总体而言,当参与者能够偿还全部债务时,较高的违约金额会使还款水平平均提高 14.56%,而当他们只能偿还债务总额的 60% 时,则会提高 3.14%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信