Jose M. Ortiz , Lucas I. Teixeira , Natália N.L. Falcão , Erika A. Soki , Raquel M. Almeida
{"title":"Information simplification and default choices improve financial decisions: A credit card statement experiment.","authors":"Jose M. Ortiz , Lucas I. Teixeira , Natália N.L. Falcão , Erika A. Soki , Raquel M. Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2024.102193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We run a between-subjects experiment to test how better-organized credit card statements, written in simplified language and default choices, help people make better financial decisions. Participants were shown either a standard (control treatment), a simplified, or a simplified with anchored information statement of a credit card bill. While observing the bill, they were asked factual and decision-making questions. We find higher correct response rates and debt repayment levels in our simplified information and anchored treatments compared to the control treatment. Simplified information increases repayment levels by 3.13 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 9.18 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt. We also provide evidence on the effect of default pre-filling payment choices on debt repayment. Participants were given a choice box filled with either the number zero or 100 % of the amount due. We find higher debt repayment levels when the default choice is the total amount due. Overall, a higher default amount increases repayment levels by 14.56 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 3.14 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804324000338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We run a between-subjects experiment to test how better-organized credit card statements, written in simplified language and default choices, help people make better financial decisions. Participants were shown either a standard (control treatment), a simplified, or a simplified with anchored information statement of a credit card bill. While observing the bill, they were asked factual and decision-making questions. We find higher correct response rates and debt repayment levels in our simplified information and anchored treatments compared to the control treatment. Simplified information increases repayment levels by 3.13 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 9.18 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt. We also provide evidence on the effect of default pre-filling payment choices on debt repayment. Participants were given a choice box filled with either the number zero or 100 % of the amount due. We find higher debt repayment levels when the default choice is the total amount due. Overall, a higher default amount increases repayment levels by 14.56 %, on average, when participants can repay the total debt, and by 3.14 % when they can only repay 60 % of the total debt.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.