An Intersectional Approach to Understanding the Psychological Health Effects of Combining Work and Parental Caregiving.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Samantha Brady, Taylor Patskanick, Joseph F Coughlin
{"title":"An Intersectional Approach to Understanding the Psychological Health Effects of Combining Work and Parental Caregiving.","authors":"Samantha Brady, Taylor Patskanick, Joseph F Coughlin","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Role theory suggests occupying simultaneous family caregiving and employment roles in midlife may exert positive and negative effects on psychological health. However, there is a lack of causal evidence examining the degree to which combinations of these roles influence psychological health at the intersection of gender and racial identity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (2004-2018) are used to estimate a series of individual fixed effects models examining combinations of employment status and parental caregiving situation on Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) depression scores among Black and White men and women aged 50-65. Subsequent models were stratified by intensity of caregiving situation and work schedule.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individual fixed effects models demonstrate combining work, and parental caregiving is associated with greater depressive symptoms than only working, and with lower depressive symptoms than only caregiving, suggesting that paid employment exerts a protective effect on psychological health whereas parental caregiving may be a risk factor for depressive symptoms in later life. Analyses using an intersectional lens found that combining paid work with parental caregiving exerted a protective effect on CES-D scores among White women and men regardless of participants' intensity of care situation or work schedule. This effect was not present for Black men and women.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Accounting for intersectionality is imperative to research on family caregiving, work, and psychological health.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Role theory suggests occupying simultaneous family caregiving and employment roles in midlife may exert positive and negative effects on psychological health. However, there is a lack of causal evidence examining the degree to which combinations of these roles influence psychological health at the intersection of gender and racial identity.

Methods: Longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (2004-2018) are used to estimate a series of individual fixed effects models examining combinations of employment status and parental caregiving situation on Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) depression scores among Black and White men and women aged 50-65. Subsequent models were stratified by intensity of caregiving situation and work schedule.

Results: Individual fixed effects models demonstrate combining work, and parental caregiving is associated with greater depressive symptoms than only working, and with lower depressive symptoms than only caregiving, suggesting that paid employment exerts a protective effect on psychological health whereas parental caregiving may be a risk factor for depressive symptoms in later life. Analyses using an intersectional lens found that combining paid work with parental caregiving exerted a protective effect on CES-D scores among White women and men regardless of participants' intensity of care situation or work schedule. This effect was not present for Black men and women.

Discussion: Accounting for intersectionality is imperative to research on family caregiving, work, and psychological health.

以交叉方法了解兼顾工作和照顾父母对心理健康的影响。
目的角色理论认为,在中年同时扮演照顾家庭和就业的角色可能会对心理健康产生积极或消极的影响。然而,目前还缺乏因果证据来研究这些角色的组合在性别和种族身份交叉点上对心理健康的影响程度:方法:利用健康与退休研究(Health and Retirement Study,2004-2018 年)中的纵向数据,对一系列个体固定效应模型进行估计,考察就业状况和父母照顾情况的组合对 50-65 岁黑人和白人男性和女性 CES-D 抑郁评分的影响。随后的模型按照顾情况的强度和工作日程进行了分层:个人固定效应模型表明,与只工作相比,兼顾工作和照顾父母会导致抑郁症状加重,与只照顾父母相比,兼顾工作和照顾父母会导致抑郁症状减轻,这表明有偿就业对心理健康具有保护作用,而照顾父母则可能成为晚年抑郁症状的风险因素。使用交叉视角进行的分析发现,在白人女性和男性中,将有偿工作与照顾父母相结合对 CES-D 分数具有保护作用,而与参与者的照顾强度或工作时间安排无关。黑人男性和女性则不存在这种效应:讨论:考虑交叉性对于有关家庭照顾、工作和心理健康的研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信