Greater glycemic control following low-load, high-repetition resistance exercise compared with moderate-intensity continuous exercise in males and females: a randomized control trial.

Kayleigh M Beaudry, Julian C Surdi, Kristian Pancevski, Cory Tremblay, Michaela C Devries
{"title":"Greater glycemic control following low-load, high-repetition resistance exercise compared with moderate-intensity continuous exercise in males and females: a randomized control trial.","authors":"Kayleigh M Beaudry, Julian C Surdi, Kristian Pancevski, Cory Tremblay, Michaela C Devries","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2023-0353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise has long been known for its beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity (IS) and glucose handling with both moderate-intensity continuous (MIC) exercise and resistance exercise (RE) inducing beneficial effects. In recent years, low-load, high-repetition (LLHR) RE has emerged as a strategy to increase muscle mass and strength to levels similar to traditional RE; however, the effects of LLHR RE on glucose handling has yet to be investigated. The purpose of this trial was to compare the acute effects of LLHR RE to MIC exercise on post-exercise glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in males and females. Twenty-four (<i>n</i> = 12/sex) participants completed acute bouts of MIC exercise (30 min at 65% V̇O₂<sub>peak</sub>) and LLHR (3 circuits, 6 exercises/circuit, 25-35 repetitions/exercise/circuit) matched for time with muscle biopsies immediately pre and post exercise and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 90 min following exercise. Blood glucose concentrations (<i>p</i> = 0.002, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2 </sup>= 0.37), glucose AUC (<i>p</i> = 0.002, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2 </sup>= 0.35) and max glucose concentration (<i>p</i> = 0.003, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2 </sup>= 0.34) were lower during the post exercise OGTT following LLHR RE compared to MIC exercise. There was a main effect of trial on TBC1D1 Ser<sup>237</sup> phosphorylation (<i>p</i> = 0.04, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2 </sup>= 0.19) such that it was greater following MIC exercise compared to LLHR RE. Furthermore, phosphorylated ACC Ser<sup>79</sup> increased following MIC exercise with no change following LLHR RE (<i>p</i> < 0.001, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2 </sup>= 0.50). Phosphorylation of PTEN Ser<sup>380</sup> was greater in males than females during LLHR RE (<i>p</i> = 0.01, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2 </sup>= 0.27). These findings suggest that LLHR RE is a feasible exercise modality to improve post-exercise glycemic control in both males and females. Trial registration number: NCT06217679.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":"943-955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2023-0353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exercise has long been known for its beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity (IS) and glucose handling with both moderate-intensity continuous (MIC) exercise and resistance exercise (RE) inducing beneficial effects. In recent years, low-load, high-repetition (LLHR) RE has emerged as a strategy to increase muscle mass and strength to levels similar to traditional RE; however, the effects of LLHR RE on glucose handling has yet to be investigated. The purpose of this trial was to compare the acute effects of LLHR RE to MIC exercise on post-exercise glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in males and females. Twenty-four (n = 12/sex) participants completed acute bouts of MIC exercise (30 min at 65% V̇O₂peak) and LLHR (3 circuits, 6 exercises/circuit, 25-35 repetitions/exercise/circuit) matched for time with muscle biopsies immediately pre and post exercise and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 90 min following exercise. Blood glucose concentrations (p = 0.002, ηp = 0.37), glucose AUC (p = 0.002, ηp = 0.35) and max glucose concentration (p = 0.003, ηp = 0.34) were lower during the post exercise OGTT following LLHR RE compared to MIC exercise. There was a main effect of trial on TBC1D1 Ser237 phosphorylation (p = 0.04, ηp = 0.19) such that it was greater following MIC exercise compared to LLHR RE. Furthermore, phosphorylated ACC Ser79 increased following MIC exercise with no change following LLHR RE (p < 0.001, ηp = 0.50). Phosphorylation of PTEN Ser380 was greater in males than females during LLHR RE (p = 0.01, ηp = 0.27). These findings suggest that LLHR RE is a feasible exercise modality to improve post-exercise glycemic control in both males and females. Trial registration number: NCT06217679.

与中等强度的持续运动相比,男性和女性进行低负荷、高重复阻力运动后的血糖控制效果更好:随机对照试验。
运动对胰岛素敏感性(IS)和葡萄糖处理的有益影响早已众所周知,中强度持续运动(MIC)和阻力运动(RE)都能产生有益的影响。近年来,低负荷高重复(LLHR)阻力运动已成为增加肌肉质量和力量的一种策略,其效果与传统阻力运动相似,但 LLHR 阻力运动对葡萄糖处理的影响仍有待研究。本试验旨在比较 LLHR RE 和 MIC 运动对男性和女性运动后血糖控制和胰岛素敏感性的急性影响。24名参与者(n=12/性别)完成了急性MIC运动(30分钟,65% V̇O2peak)和LLHR运动(3个循环,6次/循环,25-35次/循环),并在运动前和运动后立即进行了肌肉活检,在运动后90分钟进行了口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。与 MIC 运动相比,LLHR RE 运动后 OGTT 期间的血糖浓度(p=0.002,ηp2=0.37)、葡萄糖 AUC(p=0.002,ηp2=0.35)和最大葡萄糖浓度(p=0.003,ηp2=0.34)均较低。试验对 TBC1D1 Ser237 磷酸化有主效应(p=0.04,ηp2=0.19),与 LLHR RE 相比,MIC 运动后的磷酸化程度更高。此外,磷酸化的 ACC Ser79 在 MIC 运动后增加,而在 LLHR RE 后没有变化(p=0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信