Protocolized oxytocin infusion for elective cesarean delivery: a retrospective before-and-after study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03329-1
Azusa Nagai, Yuki Shiko, Shohei Noguchi, Yusuke Ikeda, Yohei Kawasaki, Yusuke Mazda
{"title":"Protocolized oxytocin infusion for elective cesarean delivery: a retrospective before-and-after study.","authors":"Azusa Nagai, Yuki Shiko, Shohei Noguchi, Yusuke Ikeda, Yohei Kawasaki, Yusuke Mazda","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03329-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To elucidate the clinical impact of the novel oxytocin protocol using a syringe pump with a stratified dose compared with the conventional practice of putting oxytocin into the bag.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study. We collected the data of the patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia between June 2019 and May 2020. The patients were allocated to two groups according to oxytocin administration methods; the control group (the attending anesthesiologist put oxytocin 5-10 units in the infusion bag and adjusted manually after childbirth) and the protocol group (the oxytocin protocol gave oxytocin bolus 1 or 3 units depending on the PPH risk, followed by 5 or 10 unit h<sup>-1</sup> via a syringe pump). We compared the total amount of oxytocin within 24 h postpartum, estimated blood loss, and adverse clinical events within 24 h postpartum between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 262 parturients were included. Oxytocin doses of intraoperative and postoperative were significantly lower in the protocol group (9.7 vs. 11.7 units, intraoperative, 15.9 vs. 18 units, postoperative). The subgroup analyses showed that the impact was more remarkable in the low PPH risk than in the high PPH risk. The multivariate linear regression analyses also confirmed the difference. The groups had no significant difference in blood loss, requirement of additional uterotonics, and other adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our oxytocin infusion protocol significantly reduced oxytocin requirements in elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia without increasing blood loss. However, we could not find other clinical benefits of the novel protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11284190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03329-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate the clinical impact of the novel oxytocin protocol using a syringe pump with a stratified dose compared with the conventional practice of putting oxytocin into the bag.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. We collected the data of the patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia between June 2019 and May 2020. The patients were allocated to two groups according to oxytocin administration methods; the control group (the attending anesthesiologist put oxytocin 5-10 units in the infusion bag and adjusted manually after childbirth) and the protocol group (the oxytocin protocol gave oxytocin bolus 1 or 3 units depending on the PPH risk, followed by 5 or 10 unit h-1 via a syringe pump). We compared the total amount of oxytocin within 24 h postpartum, estimated blood loss, and adverse clinical events within 24 h postpartum between the two groups.

Results: During the study period, 262 parturients were included. Oxytocin doses of intraoperative and postoperative were significantly lower in the protocol group (9.7 vs. 11.7 units, intraoperative, 15.9 vs. 18 units, postoperative). The subgroup analyses showed that the impact was more remarkable in the low PPH risk than in the high PPH risk. The multivariate linear regression analyses also confirmed the difference. The groups had no significant difference in blood loss, requirement of additional uterotonics, and other adverse events.

Conclusions: Our oxytocin infusion protocol significantly reduced oxytocin requirements in elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia without increasing blood loss. However, we could not find other clinical benefits of the novel protocol.

Abstract Image

在择期剖宫产中按规定输注催产素:一项前后对比的回顾性研究。
目的:阐明使用分层剂量注射泵的新型催产素方案与将催产素放入袋中的传统做法相比所产生的临床影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究。我们收集了 2019 年 6 月至 2020 年 5 月期间在神经麻醉下进行择期剖宫产的患者数据。根据催产素给药方法将患者分为两组:对照组(主治麻醉师将催产素5-10单位放入输液袋中,分娩后人工调整)和方案组(催产素方案根据PPH风险给予1或3单位的催产素栓剂,然后通过注射泵给予5或10单位的催产素h-1)。我们比较了两组产后 24 小时内的催产素总量、估计失血量和产后 24 小时内的不良临床事件:结果:在研究期间,共纳入了 262 名产妇。方案组术中和术后的催产素剂量明显较低(术中 9.7 单位对 11.7 单位,术后 15.9 单位对 18 单位)。亚组分析显示,PPH 低风险组的影响比 PPH 高风险组更明显。多变量线性回归分析也证实了这一差异。两组在失血量、额外子宫收缩剂需求和其他不良事件方面无明显差异:我们的催产素输注方案大大降低了神经麻醉下择期剖宫产对催产素的需求,同时不会增加失血量。然而,我们并未发现新方案的其他临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信