The Cambridge aided loudness profile (CALP): item choices and data for unaided listening by young and older normal-hearing listeners and older hearing-impaired listeners.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2328553
Christian Füllgrabe, Brian C J Moore
{"title":"The Cambridge aided loudness profile (CALP): item choices and data for unaided listening by young and older normal-hearing listeners and older hearing-impaired listeners.","authors":"Christian Füllgrabe, Brian C J Moore","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2328553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop an improved version of the profile of aided loudness (PAL), intended for assessment of the appropriateness of the loudness of everyday sounds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Initially, 16 participants with a range of ages and degrees of hearing loss indicated whether they encountered each situation described in the PAL and how specific they considered the description to be. Based on the responses, most situations from the PAL were eliminated and new situations were introduced, giving the Cambridge Aided Loudness Profile (CALP). The CALP was administered to 80 young and 22 older participants with normal hearing, who rated the loudness of each situation and <i>satisfaction</i> with this loudness (as for the original PAL). Satisfaction was strongly negatively correlated with loudness, suggesting that satisfaction was largely based on loudness. The CALP was then administered to 32 new young normal-hearing participants and 49 older participants with hearing loss, most of whom used hearing aids, who rated loudness and the <i>appropriateness</i> of loudness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some situations were rated as loud but appropriate in loudness, indicating that the CALP can distinguish these aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CALP questions were understood by all participants. The CALP may be useful for assessing the appropriateness of loudness.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"139-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2328553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop an improved version of the profile of aided loudness (PAL), intended for assessment of the appropriateness of the loudness of everyday sounds.

Design: Initially, 16 participants with a range of ages and degrees of hearing loss indicated whether they encountered each situation described in the PAL and how specific they considered the description to be. Based on the responses, most situations from the PAL were eliminated and new situations were introduced, giving the Cambridge Aided Loudness Profile (CALP). The CALP was administered to 80 young and 22 older participants with normal hearing, who rated the loudness of each situation and satisfaction with this loudness (as for the original PAL). Satisfaction was strongly negatively correlated with loudness, suggesting that satisfaction was largely based on loudness. The CALP was then administered to 32 new young normal-hearing participants and 49 older participants with hearing loss, most of whom used hearing aids, who rated loudness and the appropriateness of loudness.

Results: Some situations were rated as loud but appropriate in loudness, indicating that the CALP can distinguish these aspects.

Conclusions: The CALP questions were understood by all participants. The CALP may be useful for assessing the appropriateness of loudness.

剑桥辅助响度曲线(CALP):年轻和年长的正常听力听者以及年长的听力受损听者在无辅助听力情况下的项目选择和数据。
目的:开发一种改进版的辅助响度曲线(PAL),用于评估日常声音的响度是否合适:设计:最初,16 位不同年龄和听力损失程度的参与者表示他们是否遇到过 PAL 中描述的每种情况,以及他们认为描述的具体程度。根据他们的回答,我们剔除了 PAL 中的大部分情况,并引入了新的情况,从而得出了剑桥辅助响度量表(CALP)。80 名听力正常的年轻人和 22 名老年人参加了 CALP 测试,他们对每种情况的响度和对响度的满意度进行了评分(与原始 PAL 一样)。满意度与响度呈强烈的负相关,这表明满意度在很大程度上取决于响度。然后,对 32 名听力正常的年轻新参与者和 49 名老年听力损失参与者(其中大多数人使用助听器)进行了 CALP 测试,他们对响度和响度的适当性进行了评分:结果:有些情况被评为响亮,但响度适当,这表明 CALP 能够区分这些方面:结论:所有参与者都能理解 CALP 的问题。结论:所有参与者都能理解 CALP 的问题,CALP 可用于评估响度的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信