Assessing non-motorist safety in motor vehicle crashes – a copula-based approach to jointly estimate crash location type and injury severity

IF 12.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Robert Marcoux, Shahrior Pervaz, Naveen Eluru
{"title":"Assessing non-motorist safety in motor vehicle crashes – a copula-based approach to jointly estimate crash location type and injury severity","authors":"Robert Marcoux,&nbsp;Shahrior Pervaz,&nbsp;Naveen Eluru","doi":"10.1016/j.amar.2024.100322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-motorist injury severity can be affected by various observed and unobserved attributes related to the crash location type (segment or intersection). Recognizing the distinct non-motorist injury severity profiles by crash location type, we propose a joint modeling framework to study crash location type and non-motorist injury severity as two dimensions of the severity process. We employ a copula-based joint framework that ties the crash location type (represented as a binary logit model) and injury severity (represented as a generalized ordered logit model) through a closed form flexible dependency structure to study the injury severity process. The proposed approach also accommodates the potential heterogeneity (across non-motorists) in the dependency structure. The data for our analysis is drawn from the Central Florida region for the years of 2015 to 2021. The model system explicitly accounts for temporal heterogeneity across the two dimensions. A comprehensive set of independent variables including non-motorist user characteristics, driver and vehicle characteristics, roadway attributes, weather and environmental factors, temporal and socio-demographic factors are considered for the analysis. We also conducted an elasticity analysis to show the actual magnitude of the independent variables on non-motorist injury severity for the two locations. The results highlight the importance of examining the effect of various independent variables on non-motorist injury severity outcome by crash location type.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47520,"journal":{"name":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100322"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytic Methods in Accident Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221366572400006X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-motorist injury severity can be affected by various observed and unobserved attributes related to the crash location type (segment or intersection). Recognizing the distinct non-motorist injury severity profiles by crash location type, we propose a joint modeling framework to study crash location type and non-motorist injury severity as two dimensions of the severity process. We employ a copula-based joint framework that ties the crash location type (represented as a binary logit model) and injury severity (represented as a generalized ordered logit model) through a closed form flexible dependency structure to study the injury severity process. The proposed approach also accommodates the potential heterogeneity (across non-motorists) in the dependency structure. The data for our analysis is drawn from the Central Florida region for the years of 2015 to 2021. The model system explicitly accounts for temporal heterogeneity across the two dimensions. A comprehensive set of independent variables including non-motorist user characteristics, driver and vehicle characteristics, roadway attributes, weather and environmental factors, temporal and socio-demographic factors are considered for the analysis. We also conducted an elasticity analysis to show the actual magnitude of the independent variables on non-motorist injury severity for the two locations. The results highlight the importance of examining the effect of various independent variables on non-motorist injury severity outcome by crash location type.

评估机动车碰撞事故中的非机动车驾驶员安全--基于共轭的方法,共同估算碰撞地点类型和伤害严重程度
非机动车驾驶员受伤严重程度会受到与碰撞地点类型(路段或交叉路口)相关的各种观察到的和未观察到的属性的影响。考虑到碰撞地点类型对非机动车驾驶员伤害严重程度的不同影响,我们提出了一个联合建模框架,将碰撞地点类型和非机动车驾驶员伤害严重程度作为严重程度过程的两个维度进行研究。我们采用基于 copula 的联合框架,通过封闭式灵活依赖结构将碰撞地点类型(表示为二元 logit 模型)和伤害严重程度(表示为广义有序 logit 模型)联系起来,以研究伤害严重程度过程。所提出的方法还考虑到了依赖结构中潜在的异质性(非机动车驾驶员之间)。我们分析的数据来自佛罗里达州中部地区,时间为 2015 年至 2021 年。模型系统明确考虑了两个维度的时间异质性。分析中考虑了一整套自变量,包括非机动车用户特征、驾驶员和车辆特征、道路属性、天气和环境因素、时间和社会人口因素。我们还进行了弹性分析,以显示自变量对两地非机动车伤害严重程度的实际影响程度。结果突出表明,按碰撞地点类型研究各种自变量对非机动车驾驶员受伤严重程度结果的影响非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
34.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Analytic Methods in Accident Research is a journal that publishes articles related to the development and application of advanced statistical and econometric methods in studying vehicle crashes and other accidents. The journal aims to demonstrate how these innovative approaches can provide new insights into the factors influencing the occurrence and severity of accidents, thereby offering guidance for implementing appropriate preventive measures. While the journal primarily focuses on the analytic approach, it also accepts articles covering various aspects of transportation safety (such as road, pedestrian, air, rail, and water safety), construction safety, and other areas where human behavior, machine failures, or system failures lead to property damage or bodily harm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信