On entrepreneurship in forestry

IF 4 2区农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103200

Daowei Zhang

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I first present two main economic entrepreneurship theories and an analytical framework for forest-based entrepreneurships that include personal, socio-economic, forestry or forest-management specific, and institutional/contextual factors. I then present a few successful forestry entrepreneurs in the United States to highlight importance of various factors. Finally, I speculate on the future of entrepreneurship in forestry in terms of sustainable production as well as environmental stewardship in light of the recent movement toward privatization of some public goods such as forest carbon and biodiversity, and discuss research and education related to forestry entrepreneurship.

查看原文本刊更多论文

林业创业

在本文中，我首先介绍了两种主要的经济创业理论和一个以森林为基础的创业分析框架，其中包括个人、社会经济、林业或森林管理特定因素以及制度/背景因素。然后，我介绍了美国几位成功的林业企业家，以强调各种因素的重要性。最后，鉴于最近一些公共产品（如森林碳和生物多样性）走向私有化，我从可持续生产和环境管理的角度推测了林业创业的未来，并讨论了与林业创业相关的研究和教育。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学

CiteScore

9.00

自引率

7.50%

发文量

148

审稿时长

21.9 weeks

期刊介绍： Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.