Middle meningeal artery embolization for the treatment of unilateral large chronic subdural hematoma patients with significant midline shift: A single-center experience.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yin Niu, Qiang Zhang, Zhouyang Jiang, Wenyan Li, Zhi Chen
{"title":"Middle meningeal artery embolization for the treatment of unilateral large chronic subdural hematoma patients with significant midline shift: A single-center experience.","authors":"Yin Niu, Qiang Zhang, Zhouyang Jiang, Wenyan Li, Zhi Chen","doi":"10.1177/15910199241239706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The amount of midline shift (MLS) considered safe for middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has not been established. Whether MMAE could be used as upfront treatment for unilateral large CSDH patients with significant MLS (>1 cm) has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of MMAE in unilateral large CSDH patients with MLS > 1 cm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven carefully selected CSDH patients with mild or moderate symptoms and significant MLS > 1 cm from 1 May 2021 to 31 August 2022 were included in the study. All patients were treated with MMAE using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles. Outcomes were assessed clinically and with interval imaging studies at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 19 MMAs (unilateral embolization in three patients and bilateral embolization in eight patients) were successfully embolized. All 11 patients were followed for subsequent months, and there was no recurrence and enlargement of CSDH. Procedural adverse events, mortality, or complications were not observed. The average time to achieve a 50% reduction in MLS was approximately four weeks, while it took approximately eight weeks to achieve a 50% reduction in maximal volume. All 11 patients showed improvement in their neurological symptoms at three days post-operation, including four hemiplegic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MMAE may demonstrate safety in carefully selected CSDH patients with significant midline shift (MLS > 1 cm), particularly in those who are not suitable for surgery, thus providing a potential alternative approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241239706"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241239706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The amount of midline shift (MLS) considered safe for middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has not been established. Whether MMAE could be used as upfront treatment for unilateral large CSDH patients with significant MLS (>1 cm) has not been reported.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of MMAE in unilateral large CSDH patients with MLS > 1 cm.

Methods: Eleven carefully selected CSDH patients with mild or moderate symptoms and significant MLS > 1 cm from 1 May 2021 to 31 August 2022 were included in the study. All patients were treated with MMAE using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles. Outcomes were assessed clinically and with interval imaging studies at follow-up.

Results: All 19 MMAs (unilateral embolization in three patients and bilateral embolization in eight patients) were successfully embolized. All 11 patients were followed for subsequent months, and there was no recurrence and enlargement of CSDH. Procedural adverse events, mortality, or complications were not observed. The average time to achieve a 50% reduction in MLS was approximately four weeks, while it took approximately eight weeks to achieve a 50% reduction in maximal volume. All 11 patients showed improvement in their neurological symptoms at three days post-operation, including four hemiplegic patients.

Conclusions: MMAE may demonstrate safety in carefully selected CSDH patients with significant midline shift (MLS > 1 cm), particularly in those who are not suitable for surgery, thus providing a potential alternative approach.

脑膜中动脉栓塞术治疗中线明显移位的单侧巨大慢性硬膜下血肿患者:单中心经验。
背景:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)患者中线移位(MLS)的量被认为对脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)是安全的,这一点尚未确定。MMAE是否可作为具有明显中线移位(>1厘米)的单侧大面积CSDH患者的先期治疗方法尚未见报道:研究 MMAE 对 MLS > 1 cm 的单侧大型 CSDH 患者的疗效和安全性:研究纳入了 2021 年 5 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日期间精心挑选的 11 例轻度或中度症状且 MLS > 1 cm 的 CSDH 患者。所有患者均接受了使用聚乙烯醇(PVA)颗粒的 MMAE 治疗。结果通过临床和随访的间隔成像研究进行评估:所有 19 例 MMA(3 例患者单侧栓塞,8 例患者双侧栓塞)均成功栓塞。随后对所有 11 名患者进行了数月随访,CSDH 均未复发和扩大。未观察到手术不良事件、死亡率或并发症。MLS缩小50%的平均时间约为四周,而最大体积缩小50%的平均时间约为八周。所有11名患者的神经症状在术后三天都有所改善,其中包括4名偏瘫患者:结论:MMAE 对经过仔细挑选的中线明显移位(MLS > 1 厘米)的 CSDH 患者,尤其是不适合手术的患者可能具有安全性,因此是一种潜在的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信