Listening to Patients Makes Sense: Soliciting and Purposefully Addressing Written Patient Expectations at a Provider Visit Improve Patient Satisfaction.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-03-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241240925
Andras Bratincsak, Josephine Quensell, Bryan Mih
{"title":"Listening to Patients Makes Sense: Soliciting and Purposefully Addressing Written Patient Expectations at a Provider Visit Improve Patient Satisfaction.","authors":"Andras Bratincsak, Josephine Quensell, Bryan Mih","doi":"10.1177/23743735241240925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient satisfaction is an important aspect of medical care. This study aimed to assess if patient satisfaction improved when patients shared their expectations with the provider in writing before a visit, and providers purposefully addressed those expectations during the visit. We gave 2 types of questionnaires to 343 patients: Version 1 asked for written expectations before the visit and assessed the visit quality after addressing those expectations, while Version 2 only evaluated the visit without soliciting expectations. Patient satisfaction and meeting expectations were measured on a 1-10 Likert-type scale. The grouped that shared written expectations before the visit (n = 169) showed a significantly higher patient satisfaction score (9.88) compared to the group without shared expectations (n = 136, score 9.43, <i>P</i> < .0001). Conveying written expectations to healthcare providers before the visit improved patient satisfaction, potentially enhancing compliance and overall medical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241240925"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10956138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241240925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is an important aspect of medical care. This study aimed to assess if patient satisfaction improved when patients shared their expectations with the provider in writing before a visit, and providers purposefully addressed those expectations during the visit. We gave 2 types of questionnaires to 343 patients: Version 1 asked for written expectations before the visit and assessed the visit quality after addressing those expectations, while Version 2 only evaluated the visit without soliciting expectations. Patient satisfaction and meeting expectations were measured on a 1-10 Likert-type scale. The grouped that shared written expectations before the visit (n = 169) showed a significantly higher patient satisfaction score (9.88) compared to the group without shared expectations (n = 136, score 9.43, P < .0001). Conveying written expectations to healthcare providers before the visit improved patient satisfaction, potentially enhancing compliance and overall medical outcomes.

倾听患者的声音是有意义的:在医疗服务提供者就诊时征求并有针对性地解决患者的书面期望可提高患者满意度。
患者满意度是医疗服务的一个重要方面。本研究旨在评估当患者在就诊前以书面形式向医疗服务提供者表达自己的期望,而医疗服务提供者在就诊过程中有目的地满足这些期望时,患者的满意度是否会提高。我们向 343 名患者发放了两种类型的问卷:第 1 版问卷要求患者在就诊前提供书面期望,并在满足这些期望后对就诊质量进行评估;而第 2 版问卷只对就诊进行评估,不征求期望。患者的满意度和期望值的满足程度采用 1-10 分的李克特量表进行测量。在就诊前交流书面期望的一组(n = 169)与未交流期望的一组(n = 136,得分 9.43,P<0.05)相比,患者满意度得分(9.88)明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信