Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Toughness and Flexural Strength of Four Different Core Build-up Materials: An In Vitro Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Prashant Nakade, Sonam Thaore, Bhushan Bangar, Ishita Grover, Naji Alharethi, Girija Adsure, Dinraj Kulkarni
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Toughness and Flexural Strength of Four Different Core Build-up Materials: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"Prashant Nakade, Sonam Thaore, Bhushan Bangar, Ishita Grover, Naji Alharethi, Girija Adsure, Dinraj Kulkarni","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate and compare the fracture toughness and flexural strength of four different core build-up materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 60 samples were divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 15) group I: dual cure composite resin reinforced with zirconia particles (Luxacore Z), group II: light cure composite resin (Lumiglass DeepCure), group III: zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Zirconomer Improved), and group IV: chemically cure composite resin (Self Comp) respectively. All the core build-up materials were manipulated according to the manufacturer's instructions and poured into the mold. A universal testing machine applied a central load to the specimen in a 3-point bending mode. Fracture of the specimen was identified and the reading was recorded by the universal testing machine. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group I showed the highest flexural strength (48.65 MPa) among all the groups while group IV showed the lowest flexural strength (17.90 MPa). Group I showed the highest fracture toughness (99.12 MPa) among all the groups while group IV showed the lowest fracture toughness (36.41 MPa.cm<sup>-0.5</sup>). When mean flexural strength and fracture toughness values of all four groups were compared by using one-way ANOVA, the compared data was highly significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings of this study, dual cure composite resin was the material of choice in terms of flexural strength and fracture toughness for core build-up material followed by light cure composite resin.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The core buildup material serves to strengthen the tooth structure, allowing it to withstand the forces of chewing and preventing the risk of tooth fractures. This material is essential in restoring damaged or decayed teeth, as it provides a stable foundation for further dental work. By reinforcing the tooth structure, the core buildup material ensures that the tooth can function properly and remain healthy for years to come. How to cite this article: Nakade P, Thaore S, Bangar B, <i>et al</i>. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Toughness and Flexural Strength of Four Different Core Build-up Materials: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):191-195.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the fracture toughness and flexural strength of four different core build-up materials.

Materials and methods: A total of 60 samples were divided into four groups (n = 15) group I: dual cure composite resin reinforced with zirconia particles (Luxacore Z), group II: light cure composite resin (Lumiglass DeepCure), group III: zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Zirconomer Improved), and group IV: chemically cure composite resin (Self Comp) respectively. All the core build-up materials were manipulated according to the manufacturer's instructions and poured into the mold. A universal testing machine applied a central load to the specimen in a 3-point bending mode. Fracture of the specimen was identified and the reading was recorded by the universal testing machine. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and then compared.

Results: Group I showed the highest flexural strength (48.65 MPa) among all the groups while group IV showed the lowest flexural strength (17.90 MPa). Group I showed the highest fracture toughness (99.12 MPa) among all the groups while group IV showed the lowest fracture toughness (36.41 MPa.cm-0.5). When mean flexural strength and fracture toughness values of all four groups were compared by using one-way ANOVA, the compared data was highly significant.

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, dual cure composite resin was the material of choice in terms of flexural strength and fracture toughness for core build-up material followed by light cure composite resin.

Clinical significance: The core buildup material serves to strengthen the tooth structure, allowing it to withstand the forces of chewing and preventing the risk of tooth fractures. This material is essential in restoring damaged or decayed teeth, as it provides a stable foundation for further dental work. By reinforcing the tooth structure, the core buildup material ensures that the tooth can function properly and remain healthy for years to come. How to cite this article: Nakade P, Thaore S, Bangar B, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Toughness and Flexural Strength of Four Different Core Build-up Materials: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):191-195.

四种不同堆芯材料的断裂韧性和弯曲强度的比较评估:体外研究
目的:评估和比较四种不同制芯材料的断裂韧性和抗弯强度:将 60 个样本分为四组(n = 15),第一组:氧化锆颗粒增强的双固化复合树脂(Luxacore Z),第二组:光固化复合树脂(Lumiglass DeepCure),第三组:氧化锆增强的玻璃离子水泥(GIC)(Zirconomer Improved),第四组:化学固化复合树脂(Self Comp)。所有制芯材料都按照生产商的说明进行操作,然后倒入模具中。万能试验机以三点弯曲模式对试样施加中心载荷。万能试验机对试样的断裂进行识别并记录读数。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行统计分析,然后进行比较:在所有组别中,I 组的抗弯强度最高(48.65 兆帕),而 IV 组的抗弯强度最低(17.90 兆帕)。在所有组别中,I 组的断裂韧性最高(99.12 兆帕),而 IV 组的断裂韧性最低(36.41 兆帕.厘米-0.5)。通过单因素方差分析比较所有四个组的平均抗弯强度和断裂韧性值,比较数据非常显著:结论:根据本研究的结果,就抗弯强度和断裂韧性而言,双固化复合树脂是堆芯材料的首选材料,其次是光固化复合树脂:堆芯材料的作用是加固牙齿结构,使其能够承受咀嚼力,防止牙齿断裂的风险。这种材料对修复受损或蛀牙至关重要,因为它为进一步的牙科治疗提供了稳定的基础。通过加固牙齿结构,核心堆积材料可确保牙齿在未来数年内正常运作并保持健康。如何引用本文:Nakade P, Thaore S, Bangar B, et al:体外研究。J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):191-195.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信