{"title":"Modified Ileal Conduit for Pelvic Lipomatosis: Technique Description and Outcome.","authors":"Mancheng Xia, Chang Meng, Peng Zhang, Xiaohui Tan, Yuke Chen, Jian Fan, Zhihua Li, Bing Wang, Hongjian Zhu, Kunlin Yang, Liqun Zhou, Ninghan Feng, Kai Zhang, Xuesong Li","doi":"10.1159/000538369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to present the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of modified ileal conduit for pelvic lipomatosis (PL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2020 to 2022, we prospectively enrolled 9 patients with PL undergoing modified ileal conduit. The patient characteristics, perioperative variables, and follow-up outcomes as well as the description of surgical technique were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 9 patients successfully completed the operation. Two patients had perioperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade I. The mean operation time and bleeding volumes were 253 ± 51.4 min and 238.9 ± 196.9 mL, with a mean postoperative follow-up time of 13.0 ± 5.6 months. The postoperative 3-month and 1-year creatinine values were significantly decreased versus the preoperative (p = 0.006 and p = 0.024). The postoperative 3-month and 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate values were significantly increased compared with those before operation (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.018). The separation value of left renal pelvis collection system after operation was significantly reduced compared with preoperative evaluation (p = 0.023 at 3 months and p = 0.042 at 1 year) and so was the right side (p = 0.019 and p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modified ileal conduit is safe and feasible for PL. A large sample cohort with long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"314-321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to present the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of modified ileal conduit for pelvic lipomatosis (PL).
Methods: From 2020 to 2022, we prospectively enrolled 9 patients with PL undergoing modified ileal conduit. The patient characteristics, perioperative variables, and follow-up outcomes as well as the description of surgical technique were reported.
Results: All 9 patients successfully completed the operation. Two patients had perioperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade I. The mean operation time and bleeding volumes were 253 ± 51.4 min and 238.9 ± 196.9 mL, with a mean postoperative follow-up time of 13.0 ± 5.6 months. The postoperative 3-month and 1-year creatinine values were significantly decreased versus the preoperative (p = 0.006 and p = 0.024). The postoperative 3-month and 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate values were significantly increased compared with those before operation (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.018). The separation value of left renal pelvis collection system after operation was significantly reduced compared with preoperative evaluation (p = 0.023 at 3 months and p = 0.042 at 1 year) and so was the right side (p = 0.019 and p = 0.023).
Conclusion: Modified ileal conduit is safe and feasible for PL. A large sample cohort with long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of PL.
期刊介绍:
Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.