Priorities, needs and willingness of use of nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI): an Australian survey.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Vanesa Bochkezanian, Kelsey J Henricksen, Benjamin J Lineburg, Louis A Myers-Macdonnell, Dennis Bourbeau, Kim D Anderson
{"title":"Priorities, needs and willingness of use of nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI): an Australian survey.","authors":"Vanesa Bochkezanian, Kelsey J Henricksen, Benjamin J Lineburg, Louis A Myers-Macdonnell, Dennis Bourbeau, Kim D Anderson","doi":"10.1038/s41394-024-00628-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Anonymous online survey OBJECTIVES: To investigate the priorities, needs and willingness to adopt nerve stimulation devices for managing neurogenic bladder and bowel function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in Australia.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online survey of people living with SCI in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This anonymous online survey used Qualtrics and was advertised via standard communication channels, such as advocacy groups representing the SCI community in Australia, social media, attending SCI sporting events and by word-of-mouth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 62 individuals (32% female, 68% male) were included. Bladder emptying through urethra without catheter was the highest priority for bladder function. Reducing time required for bowel routines and constipation were the top priorities regarding bowel function. The highest concern for internal/implanted devices was the 4% chance of device surgical removal, while wearing wires under the clothes was the main concern for external devices. 53% of respondents were willing to trial an implanted nerve stimulation device, while 70% would trial an external device to improve and gain independence in bladder and bowel function.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study highlighted the potential role in which nerve stimulation can have in addressing bladder and bowel dysfunction in people with SCI, and have also identified that there was a need for Australian physiotherapists to evaluate their role in bladder and bowel dysfunction. Results from this study can help guide further research in nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel dysfunction in people with SCI.</p><p><strong>Sponsorship: </strong>n/a.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":"10 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10957911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00628-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Anonymous online survey OBJECTIVES: To investigate the priorities, needs and willingness to adopt nerve stimulation devices for managing neurogenic bladder and bowel function in people with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in Australia.

Setting: Online survey of people living with SCI in Australia.

Methods: This anonymous online survey used Qualtrics and was advertised via standard communication channels, such as advocacy groups representing the SCI community in Australia, social media, attending SCI sporting events and by word-of-mouth.

Results: Responses from 62 individuals (32% female, 68% male) were included. Bladder emptying through urethra without catheter was the highest priority for bladder function. Reducing time required for bowel routines and constipation were the top priorities regarding bowel function. The highest concern for internal/implanted devices was the 4% chance of device surgical removal, while wearing wires under the clothes was the main concern for external devices. 53% of respondents were willing to trial an implanted nerve stimulation device, while 70% would trial an external device to improve and gain independence in bladder and bowel function.

Conclusion: The findings of this study highlighted the potential role in which nerve stimulation can have in addressing bladder and bowel dysfunction in people with SCI, and have also identified that there was a need for Australian physiotherapists to evaluate their role in bladder and bowel dysfunction. Results from this study can help guide further research in nerve stimulation devices for bladder and bowel dysfunction in people with SCI.

Sponsorship: n/a.

Abstract Image

脊髓损伤(SCI)患者使用神经刺激装置治疗膀胱和肠道功能的优先级、需求和意愿:澳大利亚调查。
研究设计:匿名在线调查 目的调查澳大利亚脊髓损伤(SCI)患者采用神经刺激设备管理神经源性膀胱和排便功能的优先事项、需求和意愿:对澳大利亚脊髓损伤(SCI)患者进行在线调查:这项匿名在线调查使用 Qualtrics,并通过标准沟通渠道进行宣传,如代表澳大利亚 SCI 社区的宣传团体、社交媒体、参加 SCI 体育赛事和口碑传播:共收到 62 人(32% 为女性,68% 为男性)的回复。不使用导尿管通过尿道排空膀胱是膀胱功能方面最优先考虑的问题。在排便功能方面,减少排便所需的时间和便秘是最优先考虑的问题。对于体内/植入式器械,受访者最担心的是 4% 的器械手术移除几率,而对于外置式器械,受访者最担心的是在衣服下穿电线。53%的受访者愿意试用植入式神经刺激装置,70%的受访者愿意试用外置装置来改善膀胱和排便功能并获得独立性:本研究结果强调了神经刺激在解决 SCI 患者膀胱和排便功能障碍方面的潜在作用,同时也指出澳大利亚物理治疗师有必要对其在膀胱和排便功能障碍方面的作用进行评估。这项研究的结果有助于指导进一步研究用于治疗 SCI 患者膀胱和排便功能障碍的神经刺激装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信