Co-culture of chondrocytes and stem cells: a review of head and neck cell lines for cartilage regeneration.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Michael Fook-Ho Lee, Daniel Steffens, Johnson H Y Chung, Steven Posniak, Kai Cheng, Jonathan Clark, Gordon Wallace, Payal Mukherjee
{"title":"Co-culture of chondrocytes and stem cells: a review of head and neck cell lines for cartilage regeneration.","authors":"Michael Fook-Ho Lee, Daniel Steffens, Johnson H Y Chung, Steven Posniak, Kai Cheng, Jonathan Clark, Gordon Wallace, Payal Mukherjee","doi":"10.1159/000538461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bioprinting, using \"bio-inks\" consisting of living cells, supporting structures and biological motifs to create customized constructs, is an emerging technique that aims to overcome the challenges of cartilaginous reconstruction of head and neck structures. Several living cell lines and culturing methods have been explored as bio-inks with varying efficacy. Co-culture of primary chondrocytes and stem cells (SCs) is one technique, well established for degenerative joint disease treatment, with potential for use in expanding chondrocyte populations for bio-inks. This study aims to evaluate the techniques for co-culture of primary chondrocytes and SCs for head and neck cartilage regeneration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review was performed through OVID/Web of Science/MEDLINE/BIOSIS Previews/Embase. Studies reporting on chondrocytes and SCs in conjunction with co-culture or cartilage regeneration were included. Studies not reporting on findings from chondrocytes/SCs of the head and neck were excluded. Extracted data included cell sources, co-culture ratios and histological, biochemical and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies met inclusion criteria. Auricular cartilage was the most common chondrocyte source (n=10), then nasal septum (n=5), articular (n=1) and tracheal cartilage (n=1). Bone marrow was the most common SC source (n=9) then adipose tissue (n=7). Techniques varied, with co-culture ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:10. All studies reported co-culture to be superior to SC mono-culture by all outcomes. Most studies reported superiority or equivalence of co-culture to chondrocyte mono-culture by all outcomes. When comparing clinical outcomes, co-culture constructs were equivalent to chondrocyte mono-culture in diameter, and equivalent or inferior in wet weight and height.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-culture of primary chondrocytes and SCs is a promising technique for expanding chondrocyte populations, with at least equivalence to chondrocyte mono-culture and superior to SC mono-culture when seeded at the same chondrocyte densities. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal cell sources and co-culture ratios.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bioprinting, using "bio-inks" consisting of living cells, supporting structures and biological motifs to create customized constructs, is an emerging technique that aims to overcome the challenges of cartilaginous reconstruction of head and neck structures. Several living cell lines and culturing methods have been explored as bio-inks with varying efficacy. Co-culture of primary chondrocytes and stem cells (SCs) is one technique, well established for degenerative joint disease treatment, with potential for use in expanding chondrocyte populations for bio-inks. This study aims to evaluate the techniques for co-culture of primary chondrocytes and SCs for head and neck cartilage regeneration.

Methods: A literature review was performed through OVID/Web of Science/MEDLINE/BIOSIS Previews/Embase. Studies reporting on chondrocytes and SCs in conjunction with co-culture or cartilage regeneration were included. Studies not reporting on findings from chondrocytes/SCs of the head and neck were excluded. Extracted data included cell sources, co-culture ratios and histological, biochemical and clinical outcomes.

Results: 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Auricular cartilage was the most common chondrocyte source (n=10), then nasal septum (n=5), articular (n=1) and tracheal cartilage (n=1). Bone marrow was the most common SC source (n=9) then adipose tissue (n=7). Techniques varied, with co-culture ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:10. All studies reported co-culture to be superior to SC mono-culture by all outcomes. Most studies reported superiority or equivalence of co-culture to chondrocyte mono-culture by all outcomes. When comparing clinical outcomes, co-culture constructs were equivalent to chondrocyte mono-culture in diameter, and equivalent or inferior in wet weight and height.

Conclusion: Co-culture of primary chondrocytes and SCs is a promising technique for expanding chondrocyte populations, with at least equivalence to chondrocyte mono-culture and superior to SC mono-culture when seeded at the same chondrocyte densities. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal cell sources and co-culture ratios.

软骨细胞和干细胞的共培养:用于软骨再生的头颈部细胞系综述。
简介生物打印是一种新兴技术,旨在克服头颈部结构软骨重建所面临的挑战,它使用由活细胞、支撑结构和生物图案组成的 "生物墨水 "来创建定制结构。目前已探索出多种活细胞系和培养方法作为生物芯片,但效果不一。原代软骨细胞和干细胞(SCs)的共培养是一种技术,已在关节退行性疾病治疗中得到广泛应用,并有望用于扩大生物墨水的软骨细胞群。本研究旨在评估用于头颈部软骨再生的原代软骨细胞和干细胞共培养技术:通过 OVID/Web of Science/MEDLINE/BIOSIS Previews/Embase 进行了文献综述。方法:通过OVID/Web Science/MEDLINE/BIOSIS Preview/Embase进行文献综述,纳入了有关软骨细胞和SCs联合培养或软骨再生的研究。未报告头颈部软骨细胞/间充质干细胞研究结果的研究被排除在外。提取的数据包括细胞来源、共培养比例以及组织学、生化和临床结果:结果:15 项研究符合纳入标准。耳廓软骨是最常见的软骨细胞来源(10 个),然后是鼻中隔软骨(5 个)、关节软骨(1 个)和气管软骨(1 个)。骨髓是最常见的SC来源(9个),然后是脂肪组织(7个)。技术各不相同,共培养比例从1:1到1:10不等。所有研究报告显示,就所有结果而言,联合培养均优于单一培养。大多数研究报告称,就所有结果而言,联合培养优于或等同于软骨细胞单一培养。在比较临床结果时,共培养构建物的直径与单培养软骨细胞的直径相当,湿重和高度与单培养软骨细胞的湿重和高度相当或较差:结论:原代软骨细胞和SCs的共培养是一种很有前景的扩大软骨细胞群的技术,在播种相同软骨细胞密度的情况下,至少与软骨细胞单培养相当,优于SC单培养。然而,关于最佳细胞来源和共培养比例仍缺乏共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信