A tale of two platforms: A comparative analysis of language use in consumer complaints on Reddit and Spotify Community

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Qian Yin, Sebastian Sadowski
{"title":"A tale of two platforms: A comparative analysis of language use in consumer complaints on Reddit and Spotify Community","authors":"Qian Yin,&nbsp;Sebastian Sadowski","doi":"10.1002/cb.2325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumer complaints play a crucial role for companies in understanding customer needs and spotting possible areas of improvement. In the digital era, online platforms have become popular venues for users to voice their concerns. According to Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) and recipient design, consumers may have different recipients in mind when writing a complaint and tailor their language accordingly. This study aims to examine language variations in consumer complaints on an independent platform and a corporate platform, exploring how consumers adjust their language based on the intended recipients of their complaints. Comments under complaint posts from Reddit's dedicated subreddit, r/Spotify, and from the Spotify Community were extracted and analyzed using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a text analysis tool. This comparative analysis identified and compared various linguistic categories within the consumer complaints from the perspectives of formality, emotion, and assertion. The results showed that complaints on the corporate platform (1) used more formal language, (2) contained more negative emotional tones and emotion words, and (3) exhibited more assertiveness compared to those on the independent platform. Understanding the distinct linguistic features in consumer complaints on different platforms can help companies tailor their responses and address customer concerns effectively. This research contributes to the growing field of online consumer complaining behavior by uncovering how language is employed within different online communities depending on the message recipient. Furthermore, it demonstrates the potential of LIWC as a valuable tool for analyzing unstructured consumer-generated content across diverse digital platforms, offering insights into user sentiment and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","volume":"23 4","pages":"2071-2086"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cb.2325","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cb.2325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer complaints play a crucial role for companies in understanding customer needs and spotting possible areas of improvement. In the digital era, online platforms have become popular venues for users to voice their concerns. According to Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) and recipient design, consumers may have different recipients in mind when writing a complaint and tailor their language accordingly. This study aims to examine language variations in consumer complaints on an independent platform and a corporate platform, exploring how consumers adjust their language based on the intended recipients of their complaints. Comments under complaint posts from Reddit's dedicated subreddit, r/Spotify, and from the Spotify Community were extracted and analyzed using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a text analysis tool. This comparative analysis identified and compared various linguistic categories within the consumer complaints from the perspectives of formality, emotion, and assertion. The results showed that complaints on the corporate platform (1) used more formal language, (2) contained more negative emotional tones and emotion words, and (3) exhibited more assertiveness compared to those on the independent platform. Understanding the distinct linguistic features in consumer complaints on different platforms can help companies tailor their responses and address customer concerns effectively. This research contributes to the growing field of online consumer complaining behavior by uncovering how language is employed within different online communities depending on the message recipient. Furthermore, it demonstrates the potential of LIWC as a valuable tool for analyzing unstructured consumer-generated content across diverse digital platforms, offering insights into user sentiment and experiences.

两个平台的故事:Reddit 和 Spotify 社区消费者投诉中语言使用的比较分析
消费者投诉对企业了解客户需求和发现可能的改进领域起着至关重要的作用。在数字时代,网络平台已成为用户表达关切的热门场所。根据沟通适应理论(CAT)和收件人设计,消费者在撰写投诉时可能会考虑到不同的收件人,并相应地调整自己的语言。本研究旨在研究消费者在独立平台和企业平台上投诉时的语言差异,探讨消费者如何根据投诉对象调整自己的语言。本研究使用文本分析工具 "语言调查和字数统计"(LIWC)提取并分析了 Reddit 专门子论坛 r/Spotify 和 Spotify 社区中投诉帖子下的评论。这种比较分析从形式、情感和主张的角度识别并比较了消费者投诉中的各种语言类别。结果显示,与独立平台上的投诉相比,企业平台上的投诉(1)使用了更多正式语言,(2)包含了更多负面情绪语调和情绪词,(3)表现出更多的自信。了解不同平台上消费者投诉的不同语言特点,有助于企业有针对性地采取应对措施,有效解决客户关切的问题。本研究通过揭示不同网络社区中根据信息接收者的不同而使用的语言,为不断发展的网络消费者投诉行为领域做出了贡献。此外,它还证明了 LIWC 作为一种有价值的工具的潜力,可用于分析不同数字平台上由消费者生成的非结构化内容,从而深入了解用户情感和体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.60%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Behaviour aims to promote the understanding of consumer behaviour, consumer research and consumption through the publication of double-blind peer-reviewed, top quality theoretical and empirical research. An international academic journal with a foundation in the social sciences, the JCB has a diverse and multidisciplinary outlook which seeks to showcase innovative, alternative and contested representations of consumer behaviour alongside the latest developments in established traditions of consumer research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信