New grasslands promote pollination but not biological pest control in nearby arable fields in the short term

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Manuela Bürgler, Raja Imran Hussain, Bea Maas, Ronnie Walcher, Dominik Rabl, Bernhard Krautzer, Dietmar Moser, Thomas Frank
{"title":"New grasslands promote pollination but not biological pest control in nearby arable fields in the short term","authors":"Manuela Bürgler,&nbsp;Raja Imran Hussain,&nbsp;Bea Maas,&nbsp;Ronnie Walcher,&nbsp;Dominik Rabl,&nbsp;Bernhard Krautzer,&nbsp;Dietmar Moser,&nbsp;Thomas Frank","doi":"10.1007/s11829-023-10034-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agricultural intensification is a major threat to farmland biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Semi-natural habitats are integral to the preservation of farmland biodiversity and ecosystem services, however, the extent in which they contribute to specific services is largely unclear. We studied predation rates of ground-dwelling predatory arthropods, and pollination success within old permanent grasslands, newly established grasslands and arable fields near and far from new grasslands. We evaluated whether grassland restoration can enhance pollination and biological control in crop fields. For this purpose, we established new grassland strips within cereal fields, which directly bordered existing permanent grasslands. We evaluated if the distance to these old and new grasslands affects the delivery of the two ecosystem services within crop fields. We found significantly higher seed numbers and seed weight in sentinel plants placed in old grasslands, new grasslands and nearby arable fields compared to distant arable fields. We also found significantly decreasing seed numbers and seed weight in sentinel plants placed in distant arable fields with increasing distance from old grasslands, while pollination success was not affected by distance in nearby arable fields. Contrary, we did not find any significant effects of new grasslands on biological control. Our study showed that 3 years after establishing grasslands arable fields benefited from the proximity of flower-rich new grasslands through increased pollination success though not regarding biological control. This indicates that, on a short term, establishing new grasslands can support beneficial arthropods in providing ecosystem services such as pollination. Predators, in contrast, might take longer to establish effective populations that denote higher predation rates. Our study provides a baseline for future long-term studies to better evaluate pollination and pest control patterns within arable fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"18 2","pages":"327 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-023-10034-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural intensification is a major threat to farmland biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Semi-natural habitats are integral to the preservation of farmland biodiversity and ecosystem services, however, the extent in which they contribute to specific services is largely unclear. We studied predation rates of ground-dwelling predatory arthropods, and pollination success within old permanent grasslands, newly established grasslands and arable fields near and far from new grasslands. We evaluated whether grassland restoration can enhance pollination and biological control in crop fields. For this purpose, we established new grassland strips within cereal fields, which directly bordered existing permanent grasslands. We evaluated if the distance to these old and new grasslands affects the delivery of the two ecosystem services within crop fields. We found significantly higher seed numbers and seed weight in sentinel plants placed in old grasslands, new grasslands and nearby arable fields compared to distant arable fields. We also found significantly decreasing seed numbers and seed weight in sentinel plants placed in distant arable fields with increasing distance from old grasslands, while pollination success was not affected by distance in nearby arable fields. Contrary, we did not find any significant effects of new grasslands on biological control. Our study showed that 3 years after establishing grasslands arable fields benefited from the proximity of flower-rich new grasslands through increased pollination success though not regarding biological control. This indicates that, on a short term, establishing new grasslands can support beneficial arthropods in providing ecosystem services such as pollination. Predators, in contrast, might take longer to establish effective populations that denote higher predation rates. Our study provides a baseline for future long-term studies to better evaluate pollination and pest control patterns within arable fields.

新草地能在短期内促进授粉,但不能促进附近耕地的害虫生物防治。
农业集约化是农田生物多样性和相关生态系统服务的主要威胁。半自然栖息地是保护农田生物多样性和生态系统服务不可或缺的一部分,然而,它们对特定服务的贡献程度在很大程度上还不清楚。我们研究了老永久草地、新建草地以及离新草地较近和较远的耕地中地栖捕食节肢动物的捕食率和授粉成功率。我们评估了草地恢复是否能提高作物田的授粉和生物防治能力。为此,我们在与现有永久草地直接接壤的谷物田中建立了新的草地带。我们评估了与这些新旧草地的距离是否会影响作物田中这两种生态系统服务的提供。我们发现,与远处的耕地相比,放置在老草地、新草地和附近耕地的哨兵植物的种子数量和种子重量都明显较高。我们还发现,随着与老草地距离的增加,放置在远处耕地中的哨兵植物的种子数量和种子重量明显减少,而附近耕地的授粉成功率不受距离的影响。相反,我们没有发现新草地对生物防治有任何显著影响。我们的研究表明,在建立草地 3 年后,耕地因靠近花朵丰富的新草地而受益,授粉成功率有所提高,但生物防治方面则不然。这表明,在短期内,建立新草地可支持有益节肢动物提供授粉等生态系统服务。相比之下,捕食者可能需要更长的时间才能建立有效的种群,这意味着捕食率更高。我们的研究为未来的长期研究提供了一个基线,以便更好地评估耕地内的授粉和害虫控制模式:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s11829-023-10034-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信