New Graduate Nurses' Experiences by Generation in South Korea: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Heejin Chung, Mihyun Park
{"title":"New Graduate Nurses' Experiences by Generation in South Korea: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Heejin Chung, Mihyun Park","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the nursing organization environment evolves into one in which several generations work together, there are concerns about generational differences leading to conflicts.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A synthesis of qualitative studies was used to gain insight into the experiences and perceptions of new nurses working in South Korean hospitals and identify generational differences between nurses of Generations X and Y.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight databases were searched systematically for qualitative studies published up to June 2020. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to evaluate the quality of the retrieved studies, and the data were synthesized thematically using the Thomas and Harden method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,482 studies retrieved, 19 were included in this meta-synthesis. The experience of new nurses were presented in the three analytical themes of work experience, interpersonal relationships, and adaptation, from which eight descriptive themes were derived: (a) dissatisfied with own work performance, (b) negative feedback on work outcomes, (c) irregular daily life, (d) colleagues who help adapt to work life or make work life harder, (e) feelings of sympathy toward peers, (f) disrespectful patients or caregivers, (g) effective reactions, and (h) ineffective reactions. Although the new nurses from Generations X and Y reported similar experiences during their first year of nursing, differences were found in their values and tendencies regarding work and interpersonal relationships. Compared with new Generation X nurses, new Generation Y nurses placed more value on the meaning of individual work contributions, intimacy with colleagues, and appropriate feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The findings of this study support nursing administrators implementing strategies that both acknowledge and reduce the impact of generational category on nursing teams. Furthermore, emphasizing communication and acknowledging ongoing change as generations progress may strengthen bonds that lead nurses to value each other and their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":94242,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","volume":" ","pages":"e325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the nursing organization environment evolves into one in which several generations work together, there are concerns about generational differences leading to conflicts.

Purpose: A synthesis of qualitative studies was used to gain insight into the experiences and perceptions of new nurses working in South Korean hospitals and identify generational differences between nurses of Generations X and Y.

Methods: Eight databases were searched systematically for qualitative studies published up to June 2020. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to evaluate the quality of the retrieved studies, and the data were synthesized thematically using the Thomas and Harden method.

Results: Of the 2,482 studies retrieved, 19 were included in this meta-synthesis. The experience of new nurses were presented in the three analytical themes of work experience, interpersonal relationships, and adaptation, from which eight descriptive themes were derived: (a) dissatisfied with own work performance, (b) negative feedback on work outcomes, (c) irregular daily life, (d) colleagues who help adapt to work life or make work life harder, (e) feelings of sympathy toward peers, (f) disrespectful patients or caregivers, (g) effective reactions, and (h) ineffective reactions. Although the new nurses from Generations X and Y reported similar experiences during their first year of nursing, differences were found in their values and tendencies regarding work and interpersonal relationships. Compared with new Generation X nurses, new Generation Y nurses placed more value on the meaning of individual work contributions, intimacy with colleagues, and appropriate feedback.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The findings of this study support nursing administrators implementing strategies that both acknowledge and reduce the impact of generational category on nursing teams. Furthermore, emphasizing communication and acknowledging ongoing change as generations progress may strengthen bonds that lead nurses to value each other and their work.

韩国各代新毕业护士的经历:定性元综合。
背景:目的:通过对定性研究的综述,深入了解在韩国医院工作的新护士的经历和看法,并确定 X 代和 Y 代护士之间的代沟:系统检索了八个数据库中截至 2020 年 6 月发表的定性研究。采用定性研究批判性评估技能计划检查表对检索到的研究进行质量评估,并采用托马斯和哈登法对数据进行专题综合:在检索到的 2,482 项研究中,有 19 项被纳入本元综述。新护士的经历被归纳为工作经历、人际关系和适应三个分析主题,并从中得出八个描述性主题:(a)对自己的工作表现不满意;(b)对工作结果的负面反馈;(c)日常生活不规律;(d)同事帮助适应工作生活或使工作生活更加困难;(e)对同伴的同情;(f)不尊重患者或护理人员;(g)有效反应;(h)无效反应。虽然 X 代和 Y 代新护士在护理工作第一年的经历相似,但他们在工作和人际关系方面的价值观和倾向存在差异。与 X 代新护士相比,Y 代新护士更重视个人工作贡献的意义、与同事的亲密关系以及适当的反馈:本研究的结果支持护理管理者实施既承认又减少代沟对护理团队影响的策略。此外,强调沟通并承认随着代际进展而不断发生的变化可能会加强纽带,从而引导护士重视彼此及其工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信