Implementation of the e-IPOS in Home Palliative Cancer Care: A Quasiexperimental Pilot Study.

Letteria Consolo, Daniele Rusconi, Stella Colombo, Ilaria Basile, Tiziana Campa, Daniele Pezzera, Salvatore Benenati, Augusto Caraceni, Maura Lusignani
{"title":"Implementation of the e-IPOS in Home Palliative Cancer Care: A Quasiexperimental Pilot Study.","authors":"Letteria Consolo, Daniele Rusconi, Stella Colombo, Ilaria Basile, Tiziana Campa, Daniele Pezzera, Salvatore Benenati, Augusto Caraceni, Maura Lusignani","doi":"10.1177/10499091241240667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) offer advantages in palliative cancer care, including rapid completion, improved data quality and direct storage, improving clinical decision-making. The electronic Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (e-IPOS) in this context enables thorough self-assessment by patients, enhancing symptom management and self-reflection of their current situation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of implementing the e-IPOS in home palliative cancer care.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>The primary outcomes included the enrollment consent rate, study retention rate, e-IPOS completion rate and response completeness, and the number of clinical assessments and interventions performed during home visits. The secondary outcomes were the number of unscheduled visits and patients' perceived quality of life.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A two-group quasiexperimental clinical pilot study. The control group received standard palliative care, the intervention group received standard care along with weekly e-IPOS completion during home visits. Both groups were enrolled for 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Adults with advanced cancer from the home palliative care unit of the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients were enrolled (74.19%), and 20 completed the study (drop-out: 13.04%). 82.5% of the expected e-IPOS responses were received, of which 96.9% were fully complete. In the intervention group, the Wilcoxon test showed an increase in identified needs and documented interventions (<i>P</i> < .05) and a decrease in unscheduled visits (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is feasible to recruit people via home palliative care for an e-IPOS implementation study. Future fully powered studies should investigate the feasibility and assess patients' perceptions of its use to better understand its clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"186-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241240667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) offer advantages in palliative cancer care, including rapid completion, improved data quality and direct storage, improving clinical decision-making. The electronic Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (e-IPOS) in this context enables thorough self-assessment by patients, enhancing symptom management and self-reflection of their current situation.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility of implementing the e-IPOS in home palliative cancer care.

Outcomes: The primary outcomes included the enrollment consent rate, study retention rate, e-IPOS completion rate and response completeness, and the number of clinical assessments and interventions performed during home visits. The secondary outcomes were the number of unscheduled visits and patients' perceived quality of life.

Design: A two-group quasiexperimental clinical pilot study. The control group received standard palliative care, the intervention group received standard care along with weekly e-IPOS completion during home visits. Both groups were enrolled for 4 weeks.

Setting/participants: Adults with advanced cancer from the home palliative care unit of the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan.

Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled (74.19%), and 20 completed the study (drop-out: 13.04%). 82.5% of the expected e-IPOS responses were received, of which 96.9% were fully complete. In the intervention group, the Wilcoxon test showed an increase in identified needs and documented interventions (P < .05) and a decrease in unscheduled visits (P < .05).

Conclusion: It is feasible to recruit people via home palliative care for an e-IPOS implementation study. Future fully powered studies should investigate the feasibility and assess patients' perceptions of its use to better understand its clinical benefits.

在居家癌症姑息治疗中实施 e-IPOS:一项准实验性试点研究。
导言:电子患者报告结果量表(e-PROMs)在癌症姑息治疗中具有快速完成、提高数据质量和直接存储等优势,可改善临床决策。在此背景下,电子综合姑息治疗结果量表(e-IPOS)能让患者进行全面的自我评估,加强症状管理和对自身现状的自我反思。目的:评估在家庭癌症姑息治疗中实施电子综合姑息治疗结果量表的可行性:主要结果包括注册同意率、研究保留率、e-IPOS 完成率和回复完整性,以及家访期间进行的临床评估和干预次数。次要结果包括计划外家访次数和患者感知的生活质量:设计:两组类实验临床试验研究。对照组接受标准的姑息治疗,干预组在接受标准治疗的同时,每周在家访期间完成一次 e-IPOS。两组均为期 4 周:环境/参与者:米兰国家肿瘤研究所居家姑息治疗病房的晚期癌症成人:23名患者(74.19%)参加了研究,20名患者完成了研究(辍学率:13.04%)。收到了82.5%的预期电子IPOS回复,其中96.9%为完整回复。在干预组中,Wilcoxon 检验显示,已确定的需求和记录在案的干预措施有所增加(P < .05),计划外就诊有所减少(P < .05):结论:通过家庭姑息关怀招募人员参与电子实施研究是可行的。未来的全面研究应调查其可行性并评估患者对其使用的看法,以更好地了解其临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信