Diagnostic validity of abbreviated breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study to the full breast MRI protocol using BI-RADS.

Polish journal of radiology Pub Date : 2024-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2024.135474
Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin
{"title":"Diagnostic validity of abbreviated breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study to the full breast MRI protocol using BI-RADS.","authors":"Noha Yahia Ebaid, Mostafa Mohamad Assy, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2024.135474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10953509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2024.135474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This work aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast abbreviated protocol (AP) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions using BI-RADS compared with the diagnostic accuracy of the full diagnostic protocol (FDP).

Material and methods: A prospective single-centre study was conducted. A total of 125 female patients with suspicious breast masses underwent MRI with the AP and the FDP. The images of AP and FDP were independently interpreted by 2 radiologists with 10 years of experience in breast imaging, and any disagreement was resolved with a third one. Using the histopathological examination as a reference test, the diagnostic effectiveness of both FDP and AP in breast cancer screening was calculated. ROC curve was utilised to estimate the optimal BI-RADS cut-off for prediction of malignancy. The difference in image interpretation time between both protocols was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test. Moreover, the inter-test agreement between both protocols was assessed using Cohen's κ test.

Results: The study included 83 malignant and 42 benign lesions. AP indicated a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 90.5%, 96.4%, and 94.4%, while the FDP showed a specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of 92.9%, 100%, and 97.6%, respectively. BI-RADS 3 category was the best cut-off for prediction of malignancy. There was a significant difference between both protocols concerning the interpretation time (p < 0.001). There was excellent agreement between both protocols, with a κ of 0.915.

Conclusions: Breast MRI AP may be employed instead of FDP to identify breast cancer with similar diagnostic performance. Moreover, it reduces the interpretation time and the scan cost.

简略乳腺 MRI 在诊断乳腺癌中的诊断有效性:使用 BI-RADS 与完整乳腺 MRI 方案的比较研究。
目的:本研究旨在确定磁共振成像(MRI)乳腺简略方案(AP)在使用 BI-RADS 诊断乳腺恶性病变方面的诊断性能,并与完整诊断方案(FDP)的诊断准确性进行比较:进行了一项前瞻性单中心研究。共有 125 名患有可疑乳腺肿块的女性患者接受了 AP 和 FDP MRI 检查。AP和FDP图像由两名在乳腺成像领域有10年经验的放射科医生独立解读,如有分歧,则由第三名医生解决。以组织病理学检查为参考,计算了 FDP 和 AP 在乳腺癌筛查中的诊断效果。利用 ROC 曲线估算出预测恶性程度的最佳 BI-RADS 临界值。使用 Mann-Whitney 检验估计了两种方案在图像解读时间上的差异。此外,还使用 Cohen's κ 检验评估了两种方案之间的检验一致性:研究包括 83 个恶性病变和 42 个良性病变。AP的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为90.5%、96.4%和94.4%,而FDP的特异性、敏感性和准确性分别为92.9%、100%和97.6%。BI-RADS 3 类是预测恶性肿瘤的最佳临界值。两种方案在判读时间上有明显差异(P < 0.001)。两种方案之间的一致性非常好,κ为0.915:乳腺磁共振成像 AP 可代替 FDP 来识别乳腺癌,诊断效果相似。此外,它还能减少判读时间和扫描成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信