The relationship between bullying victimization and impairment in personality functioning in a clinical adolescent sample.

Personality disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1037/per0000652
Nora Seiffert, Marialuisa Cavelti, Stefanie J Schmidt, Elvira Fritz, Stefan Lerch, Corinna Reichl, Julian Koenig, Ines Mürner-Lavanchy, Michael Kaess
{"title":"The relationship between bullying victimization and impairment in personality functioning in a clinical adolescent sample.","authors":"Nora Seiffert, Marialuisa Cavelti, Stefanie J Schmidt, Elvira Fritz, Stefan Lerch, Corinna Reichl, Julian Koenig, Ines Mürner-Lavanchy, Michael Kaess","doi":"10.1037/per0000652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Problematic interpersonal relationships may represent both, a risk factor for the development or trigger of personality disorder (PD) symptoms and its consequences. Since peer relationships become more and more important in adolescence, the current study explores the cross-sectional association between recent bullying experiences and levels of impairment in personality functioning according to the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (5th ed.) alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD; Criterion A) in help-seeking adolescents (<i>N</i> = 493). Logistic and multiple regression analyses revealed that patients who were frequently bullied in the past 3 months (i.e., at least once a week) were more likely to reach the diagnostic threshold for PD according to the AMPD (<i>OR</i> = 1.71, <i>p</i> = .025) and showed higher levels of impairment in identity (β = .41, <i>p</i> < .001), empathy (β = .26, <i>p</i> = .002), and intimacy (β = .30, <i>p</i> = .001), but not self-direction, compared to patients who did not report any bullying experiences. Occasional bullying in the past 3 months (i.e., every few weeks) was neither associated with a greater likelihood to reach the diagnostic threshold for PD nor with greater impairments in identity, self-direction, empathy, or intimacy compared to no bullying. While the current study provides support for a correlation between bullying experiences and personality dysfunction (particularly in the elements identity and intimacy), longitudinal research is needed to clarify whether experiences of bullying cause or trigger personality dysfunction or/and vice versa. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problematic interpersonal relationships may represent both, a risk factor for the development or trigger of personality disorder (PD) symptoms and its consequences. Since peer relationships become more and more important in adolescence, the current study explores the cross-sectional association between recent bullying experiences and levels of impairment in personality functioning according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.) alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD; Criterion A) in help-seeking adolescents (N = 493). Logistic and multiple regression analyses revealed that patients who were frequently bullied in the past 3 months (i.e., at least once a week) were more likely to reach the diagnostic threshold for PD according to the AMPD (OR = 1.71, p = .025) and showed higher levels of impairment in identity (β = .41, p < .001), empathy (β = .26, p = .002), and intimacy (β = .30, p = .001), but not self-direction, compared to patients who did not report any bullying experiences. Occasional bullying in the past 3 months (i.e., every few weeks) was neither associated with a greater likelihood to reach the diagnostic threshold for PD nor with greater impairments in identity, self-direction, empathy, or intimacy compared to no bullying. While the current study provides support for a correlation between bullying experiences and personality dysfunction (particularly in the elements identity and intimacy), longitudinal research is needed to clarify whether experiences of bullying cause or trigger personality dysfunction or/and vice versa. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在临床青少年样本中,欺凌受害与人格功能受损之间的关系。
有问题的人际关系可能是人格障碍(PD)症状及其后果发展或诱发的风险因素。由于同龄人关系在青春期变得越来越重要,本研究根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)人格障碍替代模式(AMPD;标准 A),探讨了求助青少年(493 人)近期遭受欺凌的经历与人格功能受损程度之间的横断面关联。逻辑和多元回归分析表明,在过去 3 个月中经常受到欺凌(即每周至少一次)的患者更容易患上人格障碍、与未报告任何欺凌经历的患者相比,过去 3 个月内经常受到欺凌(即每周至少一次)的患者更有可能达到 AMPD 的 PD 诊断阈值(OR = 1.71,p = .025),并且在身份认同(β = .41,p < .001)、移情(β = .26,p = .002)和亲密关系(β = .30,p = .001)方面表现出更高程度的障碍,但不包括自我导向。与未受欺凌相比,过去 3 个月(即每隔几周)偶尔受欺凌既与更有可能达到帕金森病诊断阈值无关,也与身份认同、自我导向、移情或亲密关系方面的更大损伤无关。虽然目前的研究支持了欺凌经历与人格功能障碍(尤其是在身份认同和亲密关系方面)之间的相关性,但还需要进行纵向研究,以明确欺凌经历是否会导致或引发人格功能障碍,反之亦然。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信