Digital loneliness-changes of social recognition through AI companions.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2024-03-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1281037
Kerrin Artemis Jacobs
{"title":"Digital loneliness-changes of social recognition through AI companions.","authors":"Kerrin Artemis Jacobs","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1281037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inherent to the experience of loneliness is a significant change of meaningful relatedness that (usually negatively) affects a person's relationship to self and others. This paper goes beyond a purely subjective-phenomenological description of individual suffering by emphasizing loneliness as a symptomatic expression of distortions of social recognition relations. Where there is loneliness, a recognition relation has changed. Most societies face an increase in loneliness among all groups of their population, and this sheds light on the reproduction conditions of social integration and inclusion. These functions are essential lifeworldly components of social cohesion and wellbeing. This study asks whether \"social\" AI promotes these societal success goals of social integration of lonely people. The increasing tendency to regard AI Companions (<i>AICs</i>) as reproducers of adequate recognition is critically discussed with this review. My skepticism requires further justification, especially as a large portion of sociopolitical prevention efforts aim to fight an increase of loneliness primarily with digital strategies. I will argue that <i>AIC</i>s rather reproduce than sustainably reduce the pathodynamics of loneliness: loneliness gets simply \"digitized.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1281037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inherent to the experience of loneliness is a significant change of meaningful relatedness that (usually negatively) affects a person's relationship to self and others. This paper goes beyond a purely subjective-phenomenological description of individual suffering by emphasizing loneliness as a symptomatic expression of distortions of social recognition relations. Where there is loneliness, a recognition relation has changed. Most societies face an increase in loneliness among all groups of their population, and this sheds light on the reproduction conditions of social integration and inclusion. These functions are essential lifeworldly components of social cohesion and wellbeing. This study asks whether "social" AI promotes these societal success goals of social integration of lonely people. The increasing tendency to regard AI Companions (AICs) as reproducers of adequate recognition is critically discussed with this review. My skepticism requires further justification, especially as a large portion of sociopolitical prevention efforts aim to fight an increase of loneliness primarily with digital strategies. I will argue that AICs rather reproduce than sustainably reduce the pathodynamics of loneliness: loneliness gets simply "digitized."

数字孤独--通过人工智能伴侣改变社会认知。
孤独感的内在体验是有意义的关系发生了重大变化,这种变化(通常是负面的)影响了一个人与自我和他人的关系。本文超越了对个人痛苦的纯主观现象学描述,强调孤独是社会认可关系扭曲的症状表现。哪里存在孤独,哪里的认可关系就发生了变化。大多数社会的所有人群都面临着孤独感增加的问题,这揭示了社会融合和包容的再生产条件。这些功能是社会凝聚力和福祉的基本生活世界组成部分。本研究提出的问题是,"社交 "人工智能是否能促进孤独者融入社会的这些社会成功目标。越来越多的人倾向于将人工智能伴侣(AIC)视为充分认可的再现者,本评论对此进行了批判性讨论。我的怀疑需要更多的理由,尤其是社会政治预防工作的很大一部分都旨在主要通过数字战略来对抗孤独感的增加。我将论证,"AIC "与其说是可持续地减少孤独的病理动力,不如说是在复制孤独:孤独被简单地 "数字化 "了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信