"Help me to decide": A study of human rights-based supported decision making with persons with intellectual disabilities.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1037/ort0000724
Ugnė Gudelytė, Jonas Ruškus, Katherine Tyson McCrea
{"title":"\"Help me to decide\": A study of human rights-based supported decision making with persons with intellectual disabilities.","authors":"Ugnė Gudelytė, Jonas Ruškus, Katherine Tyson McCrea","doi":"10.1037/ort0000724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decision making is the basis for individual autonomy and societal participation. To support persons' human right to make life decisions, the model of supported decision making (SDM) has evolved and complies with Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Models for implementing SDM and outcomes achieved by applying SDM in community settings remain insufficiently explored. This study used a human rights perspective with participatory, qualitative research methods to investigate environmental conditions and social support measures that enabled persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) to make and implement their own decisions. Data gathered were 6 months of field notes about implementing SDM in a L'Arche day activity program with 26 adults with ID, with opinions and drawings illustrating persons' decision making. All data were analyzed thematically. As a result of using the SDM intervention, persons with ID became more expressive, able to discuss and debate options, participated in organizational and municipal decision making, and expressed \"joy\" and feeling \"more like a human.\" Staff supporters found SDM fulfilling and noticed it increased the sense of ownership persons with ID experienced in individual and group meetings. An organizational environment that respects human dignity, supports sustained relationships between persons with ID and decision supporters, individualizes SDM depending on how persons can communicate, and encourages staff self-reflection about prejudices and positionality is essential for implementing SDM with persons with ID. SDM processes shift oppressive social narratives and policies in the direction of a social, relational model of the decision-making capacities and competencies of persons with ID. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decision making is the basis for individual autonomy and societal participation. To support persons' human right to make life decisions, the model of supported decision making (SDM) has evolved and complies with Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Models for implementing SDM and outcomes achieved by applying SDM in community settings remain insufficiently explored. This study used a human rights perspective with participatory, qualitative research methods to investigate environmental conditions and social support measures that enabled persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) to make and implement their own decisions. Data gathered were 6 months of field notes about implementing SDM in a L'Arche day activity program with 26 adults with ID, with opinions and drawings illustrating persons' decision making. All data were analyzed thematically. As a result of using the SDM intervention, persons with ID became more expressive, able to discuss and debate options, participated in organizational and municipal decision making, and expressed "joy" and feeling "more like a human." Staff supporters found SDM fulfilling and noticed it increased the sense of ownership persons with ID experienced in individual and group meetings. An organizational environment that respects human dignity, supports sustained relationships between persons with ID and decision supporters, individualizes SDM depending on how persons can communicate, and encourages staff self-reflection about prejudices and positionality is essential for implementing SDM with persons with ID. SDM processes shift oppressive social narratives and policies in the direction of a social, relational model of the decision-making capacities and competencies of persons with ID. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

"帮我做决定":智障人士基于人权的辅助决策研究。
决策是个人自主和社会参与的基础。为了支持个人做出生活决定的人权,支持性决策(SDM)模式得到了发展,并符合联合国《残疾人人权公约》第 12 条的规定。在社区环境中实施 SDM 的模式以及应用 SDM 取得的成果仍未得到充分探讨。本研究从人权角度出发,采用参与式定性研究方法,调查了使智障人士(ID)能够做出并执行自己决定的环境条件和社会支持措施。收集到的数据是关于 26 名成年智障人士在 L'Arche 日间活动项目中实施 SDM 的 6 个月的实地记录,以及说明智障人士决策的意见和图画。所有数据都进行了专题分析。使用 SDM 干预措施后,智障人士变得更善于表达,能够讨论和辩论各种方案,参与组织和市政决策,并表示 "很高兴",感觉 "更像一个人"。工作人员支持者认为 SDM 很有成就感,并注意到它增强了智障人士在个人和小组会议中的主人翁感。一个尊重人格尊严、支持智障人士与决策支持者之间建立持久关系、根据智障人士的沟通能力对 SDM 进行个性化设计、鼓励工作人员对偏见和立场进行自我反思的组织环境,对于对智障人士实施 SDM 至关重要。SDM 程序将压制性的社会叙事和政策转变为智障人士决策能力和胜任能力的社会关系模式。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry publishes articles that clarify, challenge, or reshape the prevailing understanding of factors in the prevention and correction of injustice and in the sustainable development of a humane and just society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信