Causal diagramming for assessing human system risk in spaceflight.

IF 4.4 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Erik Antonsen, Robert J Reynolds, Jacqueline Charvat, Erin Connell, Avalon Monti, Devan Petersen, Nicholas Nartey, Wilma Anton, Ahmed Abukmail, Kristina Marotta, Mary Van Baalen, Daniel M Buckland
{"title":"Causal diagramming for assessing human system risk in spaceflight.","authors":"Erik Antonsen, Robert J Reynolds, Jacqueline Charvat, Erin Connell, Avalon Monti, Devan Petersen, Nicholas Nartey, Wilma Anton, Ahmed Abukmail, Kristina Marotta, Mary Van Baalen, Daniel M Buckland","doi":"10.1038/s41526-024-00375-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For over a decade, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has tracked and configuration-managed approximately 30 risks that affect astronaut health and performance before, during and after spaceflight. The Human System Risk Board (HSRB) at NASA Johnson Space Center is responsible for setting the official risk posture for each of the human system risks and determining-based on evaluation of the available evidence-when that risk posture changes. The ultimate purpose of tracking and researching these risks is to find ways to reduce spaceflight-induced risk to astronauts. The adverse effects of spaceflight begin at launch and continue throughout the duration of the mission, and in some cases, across the lifetime of the astronaut. Historically, research has been conducted in individual risk \"silos\" to characterize risk, however, astronauts are exposed to all risks simultaneously. In January of 2020, the HSRB at NASA began assessing the potential value of causal diagramming as a tool to facilitate understanding of the complex causes and effects that contribute to spaceflight-induced human system risk. Causal diagrams in the form of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are used to provide HSRB stakeholders with a shared mental model of the causal flow of risk. While primarily improving communication among those stakeholders, DAGs also allow a composite risk network to be created that can be tracked and configuration managed. This paper outlines the HSRB's pilot process for this effort, the lessons learned, and future goals for data-driven risk management approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":54263,"journal":{"name":"npj Microgravity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10951288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Microgravity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-024-00375-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For over a decade, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has tracked and configuration-managed approximately 30 risks that affect astronaut health and performance before, during and after spaceflight. The Human System Risk Board (HSRB) at NASA Johnson Space Center is responsible for setting the official risk posture for each of the human system risks and determining-based on evaluation of the available evidence-when that risk posture changes. The ultimate purpose of tracking and researching these risks is to find ways to reduce spaceflight-induced risk to astronauts. The adverse effects of spaceflight begin at launch and continue throughout the duration of the mission, and in some cases, across the lifetime of the astronaut. Historically, research has been conducted in individual risk "silos" to characterize risk, however, astronauts are exposed to all risks simultaneously. In January of 2020, the HSRB at NASA began assessing the potential value of causal diagramming as a tool to facilitate understanding of the complex causes and effects that contribute to spaceflight-induced human system risk. Causal diagrams in the form of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are used to provide HSRB stakeholders with a shared mental model of the causal flow of risk. While primarily improving communication among those stakeholders, DAGs also allow a composite risk network to be created that can be tracked and configuration managed. This paper outlines the HSRB's pilot process for this effort, the lessons learned, and future goals for data-driven risk management approaches.

用于评估航天飞行中人类系统风险的因果图解。
十多年来,美国国家航空航天局(NASA)跟踪和配置管理了大约 30 种在航天飞行之前、期间和之后影响宇航员健康和性能的风险。美国国家航空航天局约翰逊航天中心的载人系统风险委员会(HSRB)负责为每一种载人系统风险设定官方风险态势,并根据对现有证据的评估来确定风险态势何时发生变化。跟踪和研究这些风险的最终目的是找到减少航天飞行给宇航员带来的风险的方法。航天飞行的不利影响从发射开始,持续整个飞行任务期间,在某些情况下甚至贯穿宇航员的一生。从历史上看,研究都是在单个风险 "筒仓 "中进行的,以确定风险的特征,但宇航员同时暴露于所有风险之中。2020 年 1 月,NASA 的人类系统风险研究委员会开始评估因果图作为一种工具的潜在价值,以促进对造成航天诱发的人类系统风险的复杂因果关系的理解。有向无环图(DAG)形式的因果图用于为 HSRB 利益相关者提供风险因果流程的共享心理模型。有向无环图主要用于改善利益相关者之间的沟通,同时也可以创建一个可跟踪和配置管理的综合风险网络。本文概述了 HSRB 在这方面的试点过程、经验教训以及数据驱动风险管理方法的未来目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
npj Microgravity
npj Microgravity Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: A new open access, online-only, multidisciplinary research journal, npj Microgravity is dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in the life sciences, physical sciences, and engineering fields that are facilitated by spaceflight and analogue platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信