In Their Own Voices: A Critical Narrative Review of Black Women Faculty Members' First-Person Accounts of Racial Trauma Across Higher Education.

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sherese Johnson, Abigail Konopasky, Tasha Wyatt
{"title":"In Their Own Voices: A Critical Narrative Review of Black Women Faculty Members' First-Person Accounts of Racial Trauma Across Higher Education.","authors":"Sherese Johnson, Abigail Konopasky, Tasha Wyatt","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2024.2329680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Phenomenon</i></b>: Black women often face more challenges in academic medicine than others and are leaving the profession due to unsupportive work environments, systematic neglect, and experiences of invisibility. Research offers insight into Black women faculty experiences, but studies have largely been conducted <i>on</i> their experiences rather than written <i>by</i> them. We analyzed first-person narratives exploring Black women faculty members' experiences with racial trauma across the academy considering the intersectionality of racism and sexism to lay the foundation for understanding Black women physicians' faculty experiences in similar spaces. <b><i>Approach</i></b>: We gathered first-person narratives of Black women faculty members in the U.S. from ERIC, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline. We used a variety of terms to draw out potential experiences with trauma (e.g., microaggressions, stigma, prejudice). Articles were screened by two researchers, with a third resolving conflicts. Drawing on constructs from Black feminist theory, two researchers extracted from each article authors' claims about: (a) their institutions, (b) their experiences in those spaces, and (c) suggestions for change. We then analyzed these data through the lens of racial trauma while also noting the effects of gendered racism. <b><i>Findings</i></b>: We identified four key themes from the 46 first-person accounts of racial trauma of Black faculty members in higher education: pressures arising from being \"the only\" or \"one of few\"; elimination of value through the \"cloak of invisibility\" and \"unconscious assumptions\"; the psychological burden of \"walking a tightrope\"; and communal responsibility, asking \"if not us, then who?\" <b><i>Insights</i></b>: Black women's narratives are necessary to unearth their specific truths as individuals who experience intersectional oppression because of their marginalized racial and gender identities. This may also assist with better understanding opportunities to dismantle the oppressive structures and practices hindering more diverse, equitable, and inclusive institutional environments where their representation, voice, and experience gives space for them to thrive and not simply survive within the academy, including and not limited to medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2024.2329680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phenomenon: Black women often face more challenges in academic medicine than others and are leaving the profession due to unsupportive work environments, systematic neglect, and experiences of invisibility. Research offers insight into Black women faculty experiences, but studies have largely been conducted on their experiences rather than written by them. We analyzed first-person narratives exploring Black women faculty members' experiences with racial trauma across the academy considering the intersectionality of racism and sexism to lay the foundation for understanding Black women physicians' faculty experiences in similar spaces. Approach: We gathered first-person narratives of Black women faculty members in the U.S. from ERIC, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline. We used a variety of terms to draw out potential experiences with trauma (e.g., microaggressions, stigma, prejudice). Articles were screened by two researchers, with a third resolving conflicts. Drawing on constructs from Black feminist theory, two researchers extracted from each article authors' claims about: (a) their institutions, (b) their experiences in those spaces, and (c) suggestions for change. We then analyzed these data through the lens of racial trauma while also noting the effects of gendered racism. Findings: We identified four key themes from the 46 first-person accounts of racial trauma of Black faculty members in higher education: pressures arising from being "the only" or "one of few"; elimination of value through the "cloak of invisibility" and "unconscious assumptions"; the psychological burden of "walking a tightrope"; and communal responsibility, asking "if not us, then who?" Insights: Black women's narratives are necessary to unearth their specific truths as individuals who experience intersectional oppression because of their marginalized racial and gender identities. This may also assist with better understanding opportunities to dismantle the oppressive structures and practices hindering more diverse, equitable, and inclusive institutional environments where their representation, voice, and experience gives space for them to thrive and not simply survive within the academy, including and not limited to medicine.

In Their Own Voices:黑人女教职员在高等教育中对种族创伤的第一人称叙述评论》。
现象:黑人女性在学术医学界往往比其他人面临更多的挑战,并且由于不支持的工作环境、系统性的忽视和被忽视的经历而离开这一行业。有关黑人女教职员经历的研究为我们提供了洞察力,但大部分研究都是针对她们的经历进行的,而不是由她们撰写的。我们分析了第一人称叙事,探讨了黑人女教职员在整个学术界的种族创伤经历,考虑了种族主义和性别歧视的交叉性,为理解黑人女医师在类似空间的教职员工经历奠定了基础。方法:我们从 ERIC、Web of Science 和 Ovid Medline 收集了美国黑人女教师的第一人称叙述。我们使用了各种术语来引出潜在的创伤经历(例如,微言微语、污名化、偏见)。文章由两名研究人员筛选,由第三名研究人员解决冲突。两位研究人员借鉴黑人女权主义理论,从每篇文章中提取了作者关于以下方面的主张:(a) 他们的机构,(b) 他们在这些空间中的经历,以及 (c) 变革建议。然后,我们从种族创伤的角度分析了这些数据,同时也注意到了性别种族主义的影响。研究结果我们从 46 位第一人称描述的高等教育中黑人教职员工的种族创伤中发现了四个关键主题:"唯一 "或 "少数之一 "带来的压力;通过 "隐形外衣 "和 "无意识假设 "消除价值;"走钢丝 "的心理负担;以及 "如果不是我们,那是谁 "的共同责任。见解:黑人妇女的叙述对于揭示她们作为因其边缘化的种族和性别身份而遭受交叉压迫的个人的具体真相是必要的。这也有助于更好地了解各种机会,以消除阻碍更多样化、更公平和更具包容性的机构环境的压迫性结构和做法,在这样的环境中,她们的代表权、发言权和经验为她们提供了发展空间,而不仅仅是在学术界(包括但不限于医学界)生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信