Evidence of validity of the Smoking Cessation Counseling scale - Brazilian version.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-03-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.6587.4125
Juliana Maria Ruoco Zambardi Porreca, Robin Purdy Newhouse, Vinicius Batista Santos, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite de Barros
{"title":"Evidence of validity of the Smoking Cessation Counseling scale - Brazilian version.","authors":"Juliana Maria Ruoco Zambardi Porreca, Robin Purdy Newhouse, Vinicius Batista Santos, Juliana de Lima Lopes, Alba Lúcia Bottura Leite de Barros","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.6587.4125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate the evidence of validity of the internal structure and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Smoking Cessation Counseling instrument.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>psychometric study of confirmatory factor analysis and reliability carried out on 250 nurses in clinical practice. For the analysis of the convergent validity of the factor model, Average Variance Extracted values were calculated, and discriminant analysis was carried out using the Fornell-Larcker criterion. Reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and composite reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>it was necessary to exclude seven items from the Advanced Counseling domain and one item from the Basic Counseling domain in order to properly obtain the Average Variance Extracted values and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. The composite reliability ranged from 0.76 to 0.86 and the overall Cronbach`s alpha coefficient was 0.86, ranging from 0.53 to 0.84 depending on the domain assessed. The final version of the instrument was made up of 16 items divided into 4 domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the Brazilian version of Smoking Cessation Counseling obtained adequate psychometric evidence of validity and reliability. Further studies are needed to refine the instrument.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(1) Instrument shows adequate internal consistency and validity.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(2) Evaluate counseling practices and their impact on patient care.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(3) Instrument for evaluating smoking cessation counseling.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>(4) Provides important information for planning nursing care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":"32 ","pages":"e4125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6587.4125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the evidence of validity of the internal structure and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Smoking Cessation Counseling instrument.

Method: psychometric study of confirmatory factor analysis and reliability carried out on 250 nurses in clinical practice. For the analysis of the convergent validity of the factor model, Average Variance Extracted values were calculated, and discriminant analysis was carried out using the Fornell-Larcker criterion. Reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and composite reliability.

Results: it was necessary to exclude seven items from the Advanced Counseling domain and one item from the Basic Counseling domain in order to properly obtain the Average Variance Extracted values and the Fornell-Larcker criterion. The composite reliability ranged from 0.76 to 0.86 and the overall Cronbach`s alpha coefficient was 0.86, ranging from 0.53 to 0.84 depending on the domain assessed. The final version of the instrument was made up of 16 items divided into 4 domains.

Conclusion: the Brazilian version of Smoking Cessation Counseling obtained adequate psychometric evidence of validity and reliability. Further studies are needed to refine the instrument.

Background: (1) Instrument shows adequate internal consistency and validity.

Background: (2) Evaluate counseling practices and their impact on patient care.

Background: (3) Instrument for evaluating smoking cessation counseling.

Background: (4) Provides important information for planning nursing care.

戒烟咨询量表--巴西版的有效性证据。
目的:评估巴西版戒烟咨询工具内部结构和可靠性的有效性证据。方法:对 250 名临床护士进行确证因子分析和可靠性心理测量研究。为了分析因子模型的收敛效度,计算了平均方差提取值,并使用 Fornell-Larcker 标准进行了判别分析。结果表明:为了正确获得平均方差提取值和 Fornell-Larcker 标准,有必要排除高级咨询领域的 7 个项目和基础咨询领域的 1 个项目。综合信度范围为 0.76 至 0.86,总体 Cronbach α 系数为 0.86,根据评估领域的不同,信度范围为 0.53 至 0.84。结论:巴西版戒烟咨询获得了充分的心理测量学效度和信度证据。背景:(1)该工具显示出充分的内部一致性和有效性。背景:(2)评估戒烟咨询实践及其对患者护理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral. Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信