How Accurate Are Anatomical Surface Topography Parameters in Indicating the Presence of a Scoliosis?

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004990
Adrian Gardner, Fiona Berryman, Paul Pynsent
{"title":"How Accurate Are Anatomical Surface Topography Parameters in Indicating the Presence of a Scoliosis?","authors":"Adrian Gardner, Fiona Berryman, Paul Pynsent","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000004990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the presence of scoliosis from surface data.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Identifying AIS can be difficult. Screening is not universal for reasons including high false positive and negative rates. These difficulties can lead to some adolescents missing out on bracing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Logistic regression analysis of ISIS2 surface topography images only was performed. The x,y positions of the shoulders (Sh), axillae (Ax), waist (waist) and the x,y,z positions of the most prominent points over the posterior torso (scap) were used for the thoracic, thoracolumbar/lumbar and whole spine. The models were used to identify the presence of a 20-degree or larger scoliosis. Differences in the position of the landmarks were analyzed comparing left and right, with the suffix \"Ht\" representing a difference in the y coordinate, \"Off\" the x coordinate, and \"Depth,\" the z coordinate. Model accuracy was assessed as both percentages and ROC curves with the coefficients as odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1283 images (1015 females and 268 males) all with a diagnosis of AIS. The models identified scoliosis in the thoracic spine with an 83% accuracy (AUC 0.91), thoracolumbar/lumbar spine with 74% accuracy (AUC 0.76), and whole spine with 80% accuracy (AUC 0.88). Significant parameters were AxDiffHt, AxDiffOff, WaistDiffHt, ScapDiffOff, and ScapDiffHt for the thoracic curves, AxDiffHt, AxDiffOff, WaistDiffHt for the thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, and AxDiffHt, AxDiffOff, WaistDiffHt and ScapDiffHt for the whole spine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of fixed anatomical points around the torso, analyzed using logistic regression, has a high accuracy for identifying curves in the thoracic, thoracolumbar/lumbar, and whole spines. While coming from surface topography images, the results raise the future use of digital photography as a tool for the identification of small scoliosis without using other imaging techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1645-1651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort.

Objective: To identify the presence of scoliosis from surface data.

Summary of background data: Identifying AIS can be difficult. Screening is not universal for reasons including high false positive and negative rates. These difficulties can lead to some adolescents missing out on bracing.

Methods: Logistic regression analysis of ISIS2 surface topography images only was performed. The x,y positions of the shoulders (Sh), axillae (Ax), waist (waist) and the x,y,z positions of the most prominent points over the posterior torso (scap) were used for the thoracic, thoracolumbar/lumbar and whole spine. The models were used to identify the presence of a 20-degree or larger scoliosis. Differences in the position of the landmarks were analyzed comparing left and right, with the suffix "Ht" representing a difference in the y coordinate, "Off" the x coordinate, and "Depth," the z coordinate. Model accuracy was assessed as both percentages and ROC curves with the coefficients as odds ratios.

Results: There were 1283 images (1015 females and 268 males) all with a diagnosis of AIS. The models identified scoliosis in the thoracic spine with an 83% accuracy (AUC 0.91), thoracolumbar/lumbar spine with 74% accuracy (AUC 0.76), and whole spine with 80% accuracy (AUC 0.88). Significant parameters were AxDiffHt, AxDiffOff, WaistDiffHt, ScapDiffOff, and ScapDiffHt for the thoracic curves, AxDiffHt, AxDiffOff, WaistDiffHt for the thoracolumbar/lumbar curves, and AxDiffHt, AxDiffOff, WaistDiffHt and ScapDiffHt for the whole spine.

Conclusions: The use of fixed anatomical points around the torso, analyzed using logistic regression, has a high accuracy for identifying curves in the thoracic, thoracolumbar/lumbar, and whole spines. While coming from surface topography images, the results raise the future use of digital photography as a tool for the identification of small scoliosis without using other imaging techniques.

解剖学表面拓扑参数在显示脊柱侧凸方面的准确性如何?
研究设计对纵向队列进行回顾性分析:从表面数据中识别是否存在脊柱侧弯:背景资料概要:识别脊柱侧弯可能很困难。由于假阳性率和阴性率较高等原因,筛查并不普遍。这些困难可能会导致一些青少年错过矫形治疗:方法:仅对 ISIS2 表面地形图图像进行逻辑回归分析。肩部(Sh)、腋窝(Ax)、腰部(Waist)的 x、y、z 位置以及躯干后部最突出点(Scap)的 x、y、z 位置被用于胸椎、胸腰椎/腰椎和整个脊柱。这些模型用于识别是否存在 20° 或更大的脊柱侧弯。对地标位置的差异进行分析,比较左右,后缀 "Ht "代表 y 坐标的差异,"Off "代表 x 坐标,"Depth "代表 z 坐标。模型准确性以百分比和 ROC 曲线进行评估,系数为几率比率:共有 1283 张图像(女性 1015 张,男性 268 张)被诊断为 AIS。模型识别胸椎脊柱侧弯的准确率为 83%(AUC 0.91),胸腰/腰椎脊柱侧弯的准确率为 74%(AUC 0.76),整个脊柱脊柱侧弯的准确率为 80%(AUC 0.88)。胸椎曲线的重要参数为 AxDiffHt、AxDiffOff、WaistDiffHt、ScapDiffOff 和 ScapDiffHt,胸腰/腰椎曲线的重要参数为 AxDiffHt、AxDiffOff、WaistDiffHt,整个脊柱的重要参数为 AxDiffHt、AxDiffOff、WaistDiffHt 和 ScapDiffHt:使用躯干周围的固定解剖点,并通过逻辑回归进行分析,对胸椎、胸腰椎和全脊柱曲线的识别具有很高的准确性。这些结果虽然来自于表面地形图图像,但却提出了在不使用其他成像技术的情况下,将数码摄影作为识别小脊柱侧弯的工具的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信