Evaluation of Epiconus and Conus Medullaris Disorders due to Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture using Motor-evoked Potentials.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004992
Naosuke Kamei, Toshio Nakamae, Toshiaki Maruyama, Kazuto Nakao, Fadlyansyah Farid, Hiroki Fukui, Nobuo Adachi
{"title":"Evaluation of Epiconus and Conus Medullaris Disorders due to Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture using Motor-evoked Potentials.","authors":"Naosuke Kamei, Toshio Nakamae, Toshiaki Maruyama, Kazuto Nakao, Fadlyansyah Farid, Hiroki Fukui, Nobuo Adachi","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000004992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective case-control study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the motor evoked potential (MEP) when the epiconus or conus medullaris is compressed by a fracture of the T12 or L1 vertebra.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Although the characteristics of compressive cervical and thoracic myelopathy with transcranial magnetic stimulation MEP have been reported, the MEP parameters in compressive disorders of the epiconus and conus medullaris have not yet been characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients with T12 or L1 vertebral fractures who had lower extremity symptoms due to compression of the epiconus or conus medullaris were included. These patients were compared with 28 healthy controls and 32 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) without spinal cord compression. MEPs of abductor hallucis muscles were recorded using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve. MEP latency, central motor conduction time (CMCT), and peripheral conduction time (PCT) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MEP latency, CMCT, and PCT were significantly longer in patients with fractures than in healthy controls and patients with CSR. MEP latency was most accurate for differentiating patients with fracture from healthy controls (cutoff value, 40.0 ms, sensitivity, 95.0%; specificity, 100%), and CMCT was most accurate for comparing patients with fracture and CSR (cutoff value, 15.5 ms, sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 93.8%). In the distinction between patients with fracture and CSR, 16 of the 20 patients with fracture exceeded the cutoff values for any of the parameters, and 12 of them exceeded the cutoff values for all parameters. There was no significant correlation between the linear distance from the most inferior end of the spinal cord to the site of compression and any of the MEP parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CMCT and PCT are often prolonged in compressive lesions of the epiconus and conus medullaris, and MEP latency and CMCT are useful in the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"E387-E393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective case-control study.

Objective: To characterize the motor evoked potential (MEP) when the epiconus or conus medullaris is compressed by a fracture of the T12 or L1 vertebra.

Summary of background data: Although the characteristics of compressive cervical and thoracic myelopathy with transcranial magnetic stimulation MEP have been reported, the MEP parameters in compressive disorders of the epiconus and conus medullaris have not yet been characterized.

Methods: Twenty patients with T12 or L1 vertebral fractures who had lower extremity symptoms due to compression of the epiconus or conus medullaris were included. These patients were compared with 28 healthy controls and 32 patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) without spinal cord compression. MEPs of abductor hallucis muscles were recorded using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve. MEP latency, central motor conduction time (CMCT), and peripheral conduction time (PCT) were evaluated.

Results: MEP latency, CMCT, and PCT were significantly longer in patients with fractures than in healthy controls and patients with CSR. MEP latency was most accurate for differentiating patients with fracture from healthy controls (cutoff value, 40.0 ms, sensitivity, 95.0%; specificity, 100%), and CMCT was most accurate for comparing patients with fracture and CSR (cutoff value, 15.5 ms, sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 93.8%). In the distinction between patients with fracture and CSR, 16 of the 20 patients with fracture exceeded the cutoff values for any of the parameters, and 12 of them exceeded the cutoff values for all parameters. There was no significant correlation between the linear distance from the most inferior end of the spinal cord to the site of compression and any of the MEP parameters.

Conclusion: Both CMCT and PCT are often prolonged in compressive lesions of the epiconus and conus medullaris, and MEP latency and CMCT are useful in the diagnosis.

利用运动诱发电位评估胸腰椎骨折引起的椎弓根和髓内肌紊乱。
研究设计回顾性病例对照研究:目的:描述 T12 或 L1 椎体骨折压迫上皮或髓圆锥时的运动诱发电位(MEP)特征:虽然经颅磁刺激MEP对压迫性颈椎和胸椎脊髓病的特征已有报道,但上椎和延髓受压迫性疾病的MEP参数尚未定性:方法:纳入 20 名 T12 或 L1 椎体骨折患者,这些患者因上髁或延髓锥体受压而出现下肢症状。这些患者与 28 名健康对照者和 32 名无脊髓压迫的颈椎根性病变(CSR)患者进行了比较。通过经颅磁刺激和胫神经电刺激记录了内收肌的 MEPs。对MEP潜伏期、中央运动传导时间(CMCT)和外周传导时间(PCT)进行了评估:骨折患者的 MEP 潜伏期、CMCT 和 PCT 明显长于健康对照组和 CSR 患者。MEP潜伏期在区分骨折患者和健康对照组时最为准确(临界值为40.0毫秒,灵敏度为95.0%;特异度为100%),而CMCT在比较骨折患者和CSR患者时最为准确(临界值为15.5毫秒,灵敏度为80.0%;特异度为93.8%)。在区分骨折患者和 CSR 患者时,20 名骨折患者中有 16 人的任何一项参数都超过了临界值,其中 12 人的所有参数都超过了临界值。从脊髓最下端到受压部位的线性距离与任何 MEP 参数之间都没有明显的相关性:结论:CMCT和PCT在上髁和圆锥髓内压迫性病变中通常都会延长,MEP潜伏期和CMCT在诊断中很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信