Quality of Refractive Error Care in Cambodia: An Unannounced Standardized Patient Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2024.2321890
Anthea Burnett, Ngy Meng, Do Seiha, Neath Kong, Seila Chea, Malis Dean, Piseth Horm, Kim San Meas, Beatrice Varga, Suit May Ho, Myra McGuinness, Ling Lee
{"title":"Quality of Refractive Error Care in Cambodia: An Unannounced Standardized Patient Study.","authors":"Anthea Burnett, Ngy Meng, Do Seiha, Neath Kong, Seila Chea, Malis Dean, Piseth Horm, Kim San Meas, Beatrice Varga, Suit May Ho, Myra McGuinness, Ling Lee","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2321890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Quality-of-care in refractive error services is essential, as it directly affects vision outcomes, wellbeing, educational attainment, and workforce participation. In Cambodia, uncorrected refractive error is a leading cause of mild and moderate vision impairment in adults. We evaluated the quality of refractive error care in Cambodia by estimating the proportion of prescribed and dispensed spectacles appropriate for people's refractive error needs and factors associated with spectacle quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional protocol was employed with 18 Khmer-speaking adult participants observing testing procedures in 156 optical services across six provinces in 2022. A total of 496 dispensed spectacles were assessed against spectacle quality indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed that 35.1% of dispensed spectacles were of optimal quality. The most common error observed in sub-optimal spectacles was the presence of horizontal prism outside of tolerance limits. The study also found that 44.0% of emmetrope visits involved unnecessary prescription spectacle recommendations, and 18.3% of written prescriptions did not correspond with dispensed spectacles. Sex differences were observed, with men predominantly providing refractive error care and women more likely to be unnecessarily recommended prescription spectacles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of prioritizing quality-of-care in refractive error services. A key recommendation is to consider regulatory mechanisms to ensure optical services employ appropriately qualified staff. Additionally, efforts should be made to eliminate unnecessary prescriptions -- especially for emmetropes and females -- standardize written prescriptions, ensure consistent pupil distance measurements, reduce reliance on autorefraction, and address the gender imbalance in the refractive error workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2321890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Quality-of-care in refractive error services is essential, as it directly affects vision outcomes, wellbeing, educational attainment, and workforce participation. In Cambodia, uncorrected refractive error is a leading cause of mild and moderate vision impairment in adults. We evaluated the quality of refractive error care in Cambodia by estimating the proportion of prescribed and dispensed spectacles appropriate for people's refractive error needs and factors associated with spectacle quality.

Methods: A cross-sectional protocol was employed with 18 Khmer-speaking adult participants observing testing procedures in 156 optical services across six provinces in 2022. A total of 496 dispensed spectacles were assessed against spectacle quality indicators.

Results: The analysis revealed that 35.1% of dispensed spectacles were of optimal quality. The most common error observed in sub-optimal spectacles was the presence of horizontal prism outside of tolerance limits. The study also found that 44.0% of emmetrope visits involved unnecessary prescription spectacle recommendations, and 18.3% of written prescriptions did not correspond with dispensed spectacles. Sex differences were observed, with men predominantly providing refractive error care and women more likely to be unnecessarily recommended prescription spectacles.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of prioritizing quality-of-care in refractive error services. A key recommendation is to consider regulatory mechanisms to ensure optical services employ appropriately qualified staff. Additionally, efforts should be made to eliminate unnecessary prescriptions -- especially for emmetropes and females -- standardize written prescriptions, ensure consistent pupil distance measurements, reduce reliance on autorefraction, and address the gender imbalance in the refractive error workforce.

柬埔寨屈光不正护理的质量:一项突击性标准化患者研究。
目的屈光不正服务的护理质量至关重要,因为它直接影响到视力成果、福祉、教育程度和劳动力参与。在柬埔寨,未矫正的屈光不正是导致成人轻度和中度视力损伤的主要原因。我们通过估算适合人们屈光不正需求的处方和配发眼镜的比例以及与眼镜质量相关的因素,评估了柬埔寨屈光不正护理的质量:方法:采用横断面方案,由 18 位讲高棉语的成人参与者观察 2022 年 6 个省 156 家眼镜店的检测程序。根据眼镜质量指标对总共 496 副配发的眼镜进行了评估:分析结果显示,35.1% 的配发眼镜质量最优。在质量不达标的眼镜中,最常见的错误是水平棱镜超出容许范围。研究还发现,44.0% 的验光配镜就诊涉及不必要的配镜建议,18.3% 的书面处方与配发的眼镜不符。研究还发现了性别差异,男性主要提供屈光不正护理,而女性则更有可能被不必要地建议配戴处方眼镜:结论:研究结果凸显了在屈光不正服务中优先考虑护理质量的重要性。一项重要的建议是考虑建立监管机制,以确保眼镜服务机构聘用具有适当资质的员工。此外,还应努力消除不必要的处方(尤其是针对散光和女性),规范书面处方,确保瞳距测量的一致性,减少对自动屈光度的依赖,并解决屈光不正工作人员性别不平衡的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信