In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin and Fourteen Other Antimicrobial Agents Against Toxigenic Clostridioides Difficile Clinical Isolates in a Greek Tertiary-Care Hospital.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sofia Maraki, Viktoria Eirini Mavromanolaki, Dimitra Stafylaki, Evangelia Iliaki-Giannakoudaki, Anna Kasimati
{"title":"In Vitro Activity of Dalbavancin and Fourteen Other Antimicrobial Agents Against Toxigenic Clostridioides Difficile Clinical Isolates in a Greek Tertiary-Care Hospital.","authors":"Sofia Maraki, Viktoria Eirini Mavromanolaki, Dimitra Stafylaki, Evangelia Iliaki-Giannakoudaki, Anna Kasimati","doi":"10.1159/000538414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea worldwide. For years, metronidazole and vancomycin were considered the standard treatment for C. difficile infection (CDI). However, they are increasingly being associated with treatment failure and recurrence. In this study we investigated the in vitro activity of dalbavancin and fourteen other antimicrobials against 155 toxigenic C. difficile isolates originating from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by the MIC Test Strip and the results were interpreted using both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>C. difficile isolates were fully susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin, amoxicillin/ clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline. All isolates were dalbavancin susceptible by the CLSI breakpoint (≤ 0.25 μg/ml) compared with 97.4% susceptibility by the EUCAST breakpoint (≤ 0.125 μg/ml). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC50 and MIC90 values compared to vancomycin (0.047 vs. 0.38 and 0.125 vs. 0.5, respectively, p < 0.001). Resistance rates to penicillin, ampicilin, cefoxitin, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline were 20%, 14.2% , 100%, 75.5%, 0.6%, 51%, 36.1%, 3.2%, and 14.8%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were detected among 41.3% of the isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dalbavancin exhibited potent activity against the isolates tested. As C. difficile is an important healthcare-associated pathogen, continued surveillance is required to monitor for development of resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea worldwide. For years, metronidazole and vancomycin were considered the standard treatment for C. difficile infection (CDI). However, they are increasingly being associated with treatment failure and recurrence. In this study we investigated the in vitro activity of dalbavancin and fourteen other antimicrobials against 155 toxigenic C. difficile isolates originating from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea.

Materials and methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by the MIC Test Strip and the results were interpreted using both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints.

Results: C. difficile isolates were fully susceptible to metronidazole, vancomycin, amoxicillin/ clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, and tigecycline. All isolates were dalbavancin susceptible by the CLSI breakpoint (≤ 0.25 μg/ml) compared with 97.4% susceptibility by the EUCAST breakpoint (≤ 0.125 μg/ml). Dalbavancin demonstrated significantly lower MIC50 and MIC90 values compared to vancomycin (0.047 vs. 0.38 and 0.125 vs. 0.5, respectively, p < 0.001). Resistance rates to penicillin, ampicilin, cefoxitin, imipenem, meropenem, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline were 20%, 14.2% , 100%, 75.5%, 0.6%, 51%, 36.1%, 3.2%, and 14.8%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were detected among 41.3% of the isolates.

Conclusion: Dalbavancin exhibited potent activity against the isolates tested. As C. difficile is an important healthcare-associated pathogen, continued surveillance is required to monitor for development of resistance.

达巴万星和其他 14 种抗菌剂对希腊一家三级医院中毒性难辨梭状芽孢杆菌临床分离株的体外活性。
目的:艰难梭菌是全球医疗相关性腹泻的主要病因。多年来,甲硝唑和万古霉素一直被认为是治疗艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的标准药物。然而,它们越来越多地与治疗失败和复发联系在一起。在这项研究中,我们调查了达巴万星和其他14种抗菌药物对艰难梭菌相关性腹泻患者分离出的155株毒性艰难梭菌的体外活性:用 MIC 试纸评估抗菌药敏感性,并使用临床与实验室标准协会 (CLSI) 和欧洲抗菌药敏感性检测委员会 (EUCAST) 的断点来解释结果:结果:艰难梭菌分离株对甲硝唑、万古霉素、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦和替加环素完全敏感。根据 CLSI 断点(≤ 0.25 μg/ml),所有分离菌株都对达巴万星敏感,而根据 EUCAST 断点(≤ 0.125 μg/ml),97.4% 的分离菌株对达巴万星敏感。达尔巴万星的 MIC50 和 MIC90 值明显低于万古霉素(分别为 0.047 对 0.38 和 0.125 对 0.5,p < 0.001)。对青霉素、氨苄西林、头孢西丁、亚胺培南、美罗培南、克林霉素、莫西沙星、氯霉素和四环素的耐药率分别为20%、14.2%、100%、75.5%、0.6%、51%、36.1%、3.2%和14.8%。在41.3%的分离株中检测到耐多药(MDR)表型:结论:达尔巴万星对所测试的分离株具有强效活性。由于艰难梭菌是一种重要的医疗保健相关病原体,因此需要继续监测其耐药性的发展情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信