Effect of robbing intensity on reproductive success of Symphytum officinale (Boraginaceae).

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Journal of Plant Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s10265-024-01536-1
Nurbiye Ehmet, Tai-Hong Wang, Yi-Ping Zhang, Xiang Zhao, Kun Sun, Qin-Zheng Hou
{"title":"Effect of robbing intensity on reproductive success of Symphytum officinale (Boraginaceae).","authors":"Nurbiye Ehmet, Tai-Hong Wang, Yi-Ping Zhang, Xiang Zhao, Kun Sun, Qin-Zheng Hou","doi":"10.1007/s10265-024-01536-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The intervention of nectar robbers in plant pollination systems will cause some pollinators to modify their foraging behavior to act as secondary robbers, consequently adopting a mixed foraging strategy. The influence of nectar robbing on pollinator behavior may be affected by spatio-temporal difference of robbing intensity, and consequently, may have different effects on the pollination of host plants. However, whether and how the nectar robbing might influence pollinators under different robbing intensity still needs further investigation. In this study, Symphytum officinale was used to detect the effect of nectar robbers on pollinators under different robbing intensity as well as their effects on plant reproductive success. Six robbing levels and three bumblebees with mixed foraging behaviors were used to evaluate the effect of different robbing intensity on pollinator behavior, visitation rate, flower longevity and pollen deposition. Our results indicated that the robbing rate increased gradually with the proportion of robbed flowers, but which did not affect the frequency of legitimate visits. The increase of robbing rate promoted the corolla abscission, and then enhanced the self-pollen deposition, but which had no significant effect on cross-pollen deposition. These results indicate that the overall fitness of S. officinale was improved by combined self and cross-pollination modes when visited by both pollinators and nectar robbers simultaneously. Although nectar robbing is not uncommon, its consequences for pollination in the interaction web have not been well studied. Our results emphasize the significance of indirect impacts in mediating the adaptive outcomes of species interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Research","volume":" ","pages":"605-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-024-01536-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intervention of nectar robbers in plant pollination systems will cause some pollinators to modify their foraging behavior to act as secondary robbers, consequently adopting a mixed foraging strategy. The influence of nectar robbing on pollinator behavior may be affected by spatio-temporal difference of robbing intensity, and consequently, may have different effects on the pollination of host plants. However, whether and how the nectar robbing might influence pollinators under different robbing intensity still needs further investigation. In this study, Symphytum officinale was used to detect the effect of nectar robbers on pollinators under different robbing intensity as well as their effects on plant reproductive success. Six robbing levels and three bumblebees with mixed foraging behaviors were used to evaluate the effect of different robbing intensity on pollinator behavior, visitation rate, flower longevity and pollen deposition. Our results indicated that the robbing rate increased gradually with the proportion of robbed flowers, but which did not affect the frequency of legitimate visits. The increase of robbing rate promoted the corolla abscission, and then enhanced the self-pollen deposition, but which had no significant effect on cross-pollen deposition. These results indicate that the overall fitness of S. officinale was improved by combined self and cross-pollination modes when visited by both pollinators and nectar robbers simultaneously. Although nectar robbing is not uncommon, its consequences for pollination in the interaction web have not been well studied. Our results emphasize the significance of indirect impacts in mediating the adaptive outcomes of species interactions.

Abstract Image

盗采强度对西兰花(婆婆纳科)繁殖成功率的影响。
植物授粉系统中抢花蜜者的介入会使一些传粉昆虫改变其觅食行为,充当次级抢花蜜者,从而采取混合觅食策略。抢蜜对传粉昆虫行为的影响可能会受到抢蜜强度时空差异的影响,从而对寄主植物的授粉产生不同的影响。然而,在不同的抢蜜强度下,抢蜜是否会影响传粉昆虫以及如何影响传粉昆虫仍有待进一步研究。本研究以欧鼠李为研究对象,探讨不同抢蜜强度下抢蜜者对传粉昆虫的影响及其对植物繁殖成功率的影响。研究使用了六种抢夺水平和三种具有混合觅食行为的熊蜂,以评估不同抢夺强度对传粉昆虫行为、访花率、花朵寿命和花粉沉积的影响。结果表明,抢花率随被抢花比例的增加而逐渐增加,但并不影响合法访花的频率。抢花率的增加促进了花冠的脱落,进而提高了自花粉的沉积,但对异花粉的沉积没有显著影响。这些结果表明,当传粉昆虫和抢蜜者同时访问时,自花授粉和异花授粉相结合的模式提高了欧鼠李的整体适应性。虽然抢花夺蜜现象并不少见,但其对交互作用网中授粉的影响还没有得到很好的研究。我们的研究结果强调了间接影响对物种相互作用适应性结果的重要中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Research
Journal of Plant Research 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Plant Research is an international publication that gathers and disseminates fundamental knowledge in all areas of plant sciences. Coverage extends to every corner of the field, including such topics as evolutionary biology, phylogeography, phylogeny, taxonomy, genetics, ecology, morphology, physiology, developmental biology, cell biology, molecular biology, biochemistry, biophysics, bioinformatics, and systems biology. The journal presents full-length research articles that describe original and fundamental findings of significance that contribute to understanding of plants, as well as shorter communications reporting significant new findings, technical notes on new methodology, and invited review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信