Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity: a revisit after fifteen years.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Drug and Chemical Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1080/01480545.2024.2329752
Pucheng Ke, Ralph A Stidham, Marisol S Castaneto, Adrienne M Forbes, Robert L Fathke, Robert B Crochet, Jeremy W Lewis, Matthew D Wegner, Stephanie L Mont
{"title":"Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity: a revisit after fifteen years.","authors":"Pucheng Ke, Ralph A Stidham, Marisol S Castaneto, Adrienne M Forbes, Robert L Fathke, Robert B Crochet, Jeremy W Lewis, Matthew D Wegner, Stephanie L Mont","doi":"10.1080/01480545.2024.2329752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (RBC-AChE) activity is valuable for detecting potential exposure to cholinesterase inhibiting substances (CIS). A reliable population-based RBC-AChE activity reference range is critical for early and massive clinical and occupational toxicology screening. Previous published studies were often limited to small numbers of subjects, various testing methods, and crude statistical data analyses. We tested 4818 adult subjects with a well-established 17-minute modified Michel method over a 2-year period. We conducted a retrospective data analysis and systematically investigated on the influences to testing values from gender, age, age group, and their combinations and interactions. No significant difference was observed in the testing values between males (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.80 ΔpH/h, respectively) and females (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.81 ΔpH/hour, respectively), when gender was the only factor considered (<i>p</i> = 0.7238). However, with age progression, male testing values exhibited a consistent upward trend, while females did not show any clear patterns. Linear regression analysis of the data revealed that gender, age, and age group more or less affected testing values either as independent variables or with their combinations and interactions. However, more potential factors need to be included to achieve better testing value predictions. We recommend the toxicological testing community to adopt a new set of age group specific RBC-AChE activity reference ranges for males (0.68-0.80, 0.69-0.81, 0.70-0.83, 0.71-0.84, and 0.73-0.87 ΔpH/h for 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60 years old, respectively) while keeping the current reference range (0.63-0.89 ΔpH/hour) for females.</p>","PeriodicalId":11333,"journal":{"name":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1050-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and Chemical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2024.2329752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (RBC-AChE) activity is valuable for detecting potential exposure to cholinesterase inhibiting substances (CIS). A reliable population-based RBC-AChE activity reference range is critical for early and massive clinical and occupational toxicology screening. Previous published studies were often limited to small numbers of subjects, various testing methods, and crude statistical data analyses. We tested 4818 adult subjects with a well-established 17-minute modified Michel method over a 2-year period. We conducted a retrospective data analysis and systematically investigated on the influences to testing values from gender, age, age group, and their combinations and interactions. No significant difference was observed in the testing values between males (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.80 ΔpH/h, respectively) and females (mean, medium, interquartile range = 0.76, 0.76, 0.71-0.81 ΔpH/hour, respectively), when gender was the only factor considered (p = 0.7238). However, with age progression, male testing values exhibited a consistent upward trend, while females did not show any clear patterns. Linear regression analysis of the data revealed that gender, age, and age group more or less affected testing values either as independent variables or with their combinations and interactions. However, more potential factors need to be included to achieve better testing value predictions. We recommend the toxicological testing community to adopt a new set of age group specific RBC-AChE activity reference ranges for males (0.68-0.80, 0.69-0.81, 0.70-0.83, 0.71-0.84, and 0.73-0.87 ΔpH/h for 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60 years old, respectively) while keeping the current reference range (0.63-0.89 ΔpH/hour) for females.

人类红细胞乙酰胆碱酯酶活性:十五年后的重访。
人体红细胞乙酰胆碱酯酶(RBC-AChE)活性对于检测可能暴露于胆碱酯酶抑制物质(CIS)的情况非常重要。可靠的人群 RBC-AChE 活性参考范围对于早期和大规模临床及职业毒理学筛查至关重要。以往发表的研究往往局限于少量受试者、各种测试方法和粗糙的统计数据分析。我们采用成熟的 17 分钟改良米歇尔法对 4818 名成年受试者进行了为期两年的测试。我们进行了回顾性数据分析,系统地研究了性别、年龄、年龄组及其组合和相互作用对测试值的影响。当仅考虑性别因素时,男性(平均值、中值、四分位数间距分别为 0.76、0.76、0.71-0.80 ΔpH/小时)和女性(平均值、中值、四分位数间距分别为 0.76、0.76、0.71-0.81 ΔpH/小时)的测试值无明显差异(p = 0.7238)。然而,随着年龄的增长,男性的测试值呈现出持续上升的趋势,而女性则没有表现出任何明显的模式。数据的线性回归分析表明,性别、年龄和年龄组或多或少地影响着测试值,无论是作为独立变量,还是它们之间的组合和相互作用。然而,要想更好地预测测试值,还需要纳入更多的潜在因素。我们建议毒理学检测界采用一套新的特定年龄组男性 RBC-AChE 活性参考范围(18-29 岁、30-39 岁、40-49 岁、50-59 岁和≥60 岁分别为 0.68-0.80、0.69-0.81、0.70-0.83、0.71-0.84 和 0.73-0.87 ΔpH/小时),而女性则保持目前的参考范围(0.63-0.89 ΔpH/小时)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and Chemical Toxicology
Drug and Chemical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Drug and Chemical Toxicology publishes full-length research papers, review articles and short communications that encompass a broad spectrum of toxicological data surrounding risk assessment and harmful exposure. Manuscripts are considered according to their relevance to the journal. Topics include both descriptive and mechanics research that illustrates the risk assessment implications of exposure to toxic agents. Examples of suitable topics include toxicological studies, which are structural examinations on the effects of dose, metabolism, and statistical or mechanism-based approaches to risk assessment. New findings and methods, along with safety evaluations, are also acceptable. Special issues may be reserved to publish symposium summaries, reviews in toxicology, and overviews of the practical interpretation and application of toxicological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信