Application and Validation of an Improved One-to-Many Method to CFETR Neutronics Modeling

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Miao Yin, Qixiang Cao, Xiaoyu Wang, Xinghua Wu, Shen Qu
{"title":"Application and Validation of an Improved One-to-Many Method to CFETR Neutronics Modeling","authors":"Miao Yin,&nbsp;Qixiang Cao,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Wang,&nbsp;Xinghua Wu,&nbsp;Shen Qu","doi":"10.1007/s10894-024-00397-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China fusion engineering test reactor (CFETR) is a magnetic confinement device which will fill the gap between the fusion experimental reactor and the demonstration reactor. To efficiently conduct neutronics modeling for the multiple identical and similar structures present in CFETR’s modular design, an improved one-to-many method is developed and implemented in this study. This method involves using a basic model in conjunction with a 3D transformed coordinate system. However, the absence of a clear solution method for the transformed coordinate system in MCNP presents a challenge. To address this issue, a solution method based on the axis attributes of the surfaces in MCNP and the composite nature of the 3D transformed coordinate system is developed. The improved one-to-many method has been applied to the neutron modeling of CFETR, and its reliability has been verified. In the neutron calculation model corresponding to the one-to-many and one-to-one methods, relative differences of the total TBR and nuclear heating are 0.25%, 0.07% respectively. The contribution of blanket modules to tritium breeding ratio (TBR) and nuclear heating has a relative difference within the range of − 0.25–0.55%. The relative differences of neutron flux and nuclear heating distribution for individual blanket modules #3–1 and #6–1 are within the range of − 0.60–0.40%. The results indicate that the improved one-to-many method can be employed for neutronics modeling in the preliminary design of CFETR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fusion Energy","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fusion Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10894-024-00397-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China fusion engineering test reactor (CFETR) is a magnetic confinement device which will fill the gap between the fusion experimental reactor and the demonstration reactor. To efficiently conduct neutronics modeling for the multiple identical and similar structures present in CFETR’s modular design, an improved one-to-many method is developed and implemented in this study. This method involves using a basic model in conjunction with a 3D transformed coordinate system. However, the absence of a clear solution method for the transformed coordinate system in MCNP presents a challenge. To address this issue, a solution method based on the axis attributes of the surfaces in MCNP and the composite nature of the 3D transformed coordinate system is developed. The improved one-to-many method has been applied to the neutron modeling of CFETR, and its reliability has been verified. In the neutron calculation model corresponding to the one-to-many and one-to-one methods, relative differences of the total TBR and nuclear heating are 0.25%, 0.07% respectively. The contribution of blanket modules to tritium breeding ratio (TBR) and nuclear heating has a relative difference within the range of − 0.25–0.55%. The relative differences of neutron flux and nuclear heating distribution for individual blanket modules #3–1 and #6–1 are within the range of − 0.60–0.40%. The results indicate that the improved one-to-many method can be employed for neutronics modeling in the preliminary design of CFETR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改进的一对多方法在 CFETR 中子建模中的应用和验证
中国聚变工程试验堆(CFETR)是一种磁约束装置,将填补聚变实验堆和示范堆之间的空白。为了有效地对 CFETR 模块化设计中存在的多个相同和相似结构进行中子建模,本研究开发并实施了一种改进的一对多方法。该方法包括将基本模型与三维转换坐标系结合使用。然而,MCNP 中的转换坐标系缺乏明确的求解方法,这给我们带来了挑战。为解决这一问题,我们开发了一种基于 MCNP 中曲面轴属性和三维变换坐标系复合性质的求解方法。改进后的一对多方法已应用于 CFETR 的中子建模,并验证了其可靠性。在一对多和一对一方法对应的中子计算模型中,总TBR和核加热的相对差异分别为0.25%和0.07%。空白模块对氚孕育率(TBR)和核加热的贡献相对差异在-0.25-0.55%范围内。单个毯状模块 #3-1 和 #6-1 的中子通量和核加热分布的相对差异在 - 0.60-0.40% 范围内。结果表明,改进的一对多方法可用于 CFETR 初步设计中的中子建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fusion Energy
Journal of Fusion Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fusion Energy features original research contributions and review papers examining and the development and enhancing the knowledge base of thermonuclear fusion as a potential power source. It is designed to serve as a journal of record for the publication of original research results in fundamental and applied physics, applied science and technological development. The journal publishes qualified papers based on peer reviews. This journal also provides a forum for discussing broader policies and strategies that have played, and will continue to play, a crucial role in fusion programs. In keeping with this theme, readers will find articles covering an array of important matters concerning strategy and program direction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信