Development of Dry-herb vaporizer-assisted solid-phase Microextraction for the analysis of volatile Organic compounds

IF 5.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
A K M Ahsan Ahmed, Douglas E. Raynie
{"title":"Development of Dry-herb vaporizer-assisted solid-phase Microextraction for the analysis of volatile Organic compounds","authors":"A K M Ahsan Ahmed,&nbsp;Douglas E. Raynie","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2024.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a simple, efficient, and solvent-free technique. It integrates the steps of traditional liquid-liquid extraction, i.e., sampling, extraction, concentration, derivatization, in a single step. It is easy, combining capability with gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), and mass spectrometry (MS), which makes this method fast, reliable, and sensitive. SPME method is often associated with extraction at elevated temperature, since increasing temperature may positively affect extraction by increasing the analyte volatility, diffusion, and extraction rate. In this work, a dry-herb vaporizer (vaping pen) was used as a sample heating device for direct desorption of volatile analytes into the headspace of the device. The extraction was performed by sorbing analytes from their gas phase in the headspace of the vape onto a SPME fiber followed by desorption in the injection port for GC–MS characterization. Compounds from horseradish, cinnamon, and gasoline-spiked soil samples were analyzed. The samples were also analyzed by conventional headspace SPME-GC–MS. The results from both methods were compared. The methods produce comparable results in terms of extracted compounds and relative area percentages, however, the dry-herb vaporizer had improved sensitivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582024000111/pdfft?md5=0c98a404a2a7657445ab73f884a14fb5&pid=1-s2.0-S2772582024000111-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582024000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a simple, efficient, and solvent-free technique. It integrates the steps of traditional liquid-liquid extraction, i.e., sampling, extraction, concentration, derivatization, in a single step. It is easy, combining capability with gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), and mass spectrometry (MS), which makes this method fast, reliable, and sensitive. SPME method is often associated with extraction at elevated temperature, since increasing temperature may positively affect extraction by increasing the analyte volatility, diffusion, and extraction rate. In this work, a dry-herb vaporizer (vaping pen) was used as a sample heating device for direct desorption of volatile analytes into the headspace of the device. The extraction was performed by sorbing analytes from their gas phase in the headspace of the vape onto a SPME fiber followed by desorption in the injection port for GC–MS characterization. Compounds from horseradish, cinnamon, and gasoline-spiked soil samples were analyzed. The samples were also analyzed by conventional headspace SPME-GC–MS. The results from both methods were compared. The methods produce comparable results in terms of extracted compounds and relative area percentages, however, the dry-herb vaporizer had improved sensitivity.

Abstract Image

开发用于分析挥发性有机化合物的干草蒸发器辅助固相微萃取技术
固相微萃取(SPME)是一种简单、高效、无溶剂的技术。它将传统的液液萃取步骤,即取样、萃取、浓缩、衍生化,整合为一个步骤。该方法简便易行,可与气相色谱(GC)、液相色谱(LC)和质谱(MS)联用,因此快速、可靠、灵敏。SPME 方法通常与升温萃取联系在一起,因为温度升高会增加分析物的挥发性、扩散性和萃取率,从而对萃取产生积极影响。在这项工作中,使用了干草蒸发器(熏蒸笔)作为样品加热装置,将挥发性分析物直接解吸到装置的顶空。萃取的方法是将分析物从气相中吸附到 SPME 纤维上,然后在进样口解吸,再进行气相色谱-质谱表征。对辣根、肉桂和添加汽油的土壤样本中的化合物进行了分析。这些样品还通过传统的顶空 SPME-GC-MS 进行了分析。对两种方法的结果进行了比较。就提取的化合物和相对面积百分比而言,这两种方法得出的结果相当,但干草蒸发器的灵敏度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信