Characterizing stress processes by linking big five personality states, traits, and day-to-day stressors

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Whitney R. Ringwald , Sienna R. Nielsen , Janan Mostajabi , Colin E. Vize , Tessa van den Berg , Stephen B. Manuck , Anna L. Marsland , Aidan G.C. Wright
{"title":"Characterizing stress processes by linking big five personality states, traits, and day-to-day stressors","authors":"Whitney R. Ringwald ,&nbsp;Sienna R. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Janan Mostajabi ,&nbsp;Colin E. Vize ,&nbsp;Tessa van den Berg ,&nbsp;Stephen B. Manuck ,&nbsp;Anna L. Marsland ,&nbsp;Aidan G.C. Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accumulation of day-to-day stressors can impact mental and physical health. How people respond to stressful events is a key mechanism responsible for the effects of stress, and individual differences in stress responses can either perpetuate or prevent negative consequences. Most research on daily stress processes has focused on affective responses to stressors, but stress responses can involve more than just affect (e.g., behavior, cognitions). Additionally, most research has studied the role of neuroticism in shaping those responses, but many other individual differences are associated with stress. In this study, we more broadly characterized daily stress processes by expanding the nomological networks of stress responses to include Big Five personality states. We also linked those stress responses to all Big Five traits, as well as individual differences in stress variety, severity, and controllability. We studied a sample of participants (<em>N</em> = 1,090) who reported on stressful events, their appraisal of events in terms of severity and controllability, and their Big Five personality states daily for 8–10 days (<em>N</em> = 8,870 observations). Multi-level structural equation models were used to separate how characteristics of the perceived stressful situation and characteristics of the person play into daily stress processes. Results showed that (1) all Big Five personality states shift in response to perceived stress, (2) all Big Five personality traits relate to average levels of perceived stress variety, severity, and controllability, (3) individual differences in personality and average perceived stress variety and perceived severity relate to the strength of personality state responses to daily stress, albeit in a more limited fashion. Our results point to new pathways by which stressors affect people in everyday life and begin to clarify processes that may explain individual differences in risk or resilience to the harmful effects of stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accumulation of day-to-day stressors can impact mental and physical health. How people respond to stressful events is a key mechanism responsible for the effects of stress, and individual differences in stress responses can either perpetuate or prevent negative consequences. Most research on daily stress processes has focused on affective responses to stressors, but stress responses can involve more than just affect (e.g., behavior, cognitions). Additionally, most research has studied the role of neuroticism in shaping those responses, but many other individual differences are associated with stress. In this study, we more broadly characterized daily stress processes by expanding the nomological networks of stress responses to include Big Five personality states. We also linked those stress responses to all Big Five traits, as well as individual differences in stress variety, severity, and controllability. We studied a sample of participants (N = 1,090) who reported on stressful events, their appraisal of events in terms of severity and controllability, and their Big Five personality states daily for 8–10 days (N = 8,870 observations). Multi-level structural equation models were used to separate how characteristics of the perceived stressful situation and characteristics of the person play into daily stress processes. Results showed that (1) all Big Five personality states shift in response to perceived stress, (2) all Big Five personality traits relate to average levels of perceived stress variety, severity, and controllability, (3) individual differences in personality and average perceived stress variety and perceived severity relate to the strength of personality state responses to daily stress, albeit in a more limited fashion. Our results point to new pathways by which stressors affect people in everyday life and begin to clarify processes that may explain individual differences in risk or resilience to the harmful effects of stress.

将五大人格状态、特质和日常压力源联系起来,描述压力过程
日常压力的积累会影响身心健康。人们如何应对压力事件是造成压力影响的一个关键机制,而压力反应的个体差异可以延续或防止负面影响。大多数有关日常压力过程的研究都侧重于对压力源的情感反应,但压力反应可能不仅仅涉及情感(如行为、认知)。此外,大多数研究都研究了神经质在形成这些反应中的作用,但许多其他个体差异也与压力有关。在本研究中,我们通过扩展压力反应的名义网络,将大五人格状态纳入其中,从而更广泛地描述了日常压力过程。我们还将这些压力反应与所有五大性格特征以及压力种类、严重程度和可控性方面的个体差异联系起来。我们对参与者样本(N = 1,090)进行了研究,这些参与者在 8-10 天内每天报告压力事件、他们对事件严重性和可控性的评价以及他们的大五人格状态(N = 8,870 个观察值)。我们使用多层次结构方程模型来区分感知到的压力情境特征和个人特征在日常压力过程中的作用。结果表明:(1) 所有的大五人格状态都会对感知到的压力做出反应,(2) 所有的大五人格特质都与感知到的压力种类、严重程度和可控性的平均水平有关,(3) 个体的人格差异以及平均感知到的压力种类和严重程度与人格状态对日常压力反应的强度有关,尽管这种关系比较有限。我们的研究结果指出了压力因素在日常生活中对人们产生影响的新途径,并开始阐明可能解释个体差异对压力有害影响的风险或复原力的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信