Associations between muscular strength and mental health in cognitively normal older adults: a cross-sectional study from the AGUEDA trial

IF 5.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Darío Bellón , María Rodriguez-Ayllon , Patricio Solis-Urra , Beatriz Fernandez-Gamez , Marcos Olvera-Rojas , Andrea Coca-Pulido , Angel Toval , Isabel Martín-Fuentes , Esmée A. Bakker , Alessandro Sclafani , Javier Fernández-Ortega , Verónica Cabanas-Sánchez , Jose Mora-Gonzalez , Manuel Gómez-Río , David R Lubans , Francisco B. Ortega , Irene Esteban-Cornejo
{"title":"Associations between muscular strength and mental health in cognitively normal older adults: a cross-sectional study from the AGUEDA trial","authors":"Darío Bellón ,&nbsp;María Rodriguez-Ayllon ,&nbsp;Patricio Solis-Urra ,&nbsp;Beatriz Fernandez-Gamez ,&nbsp;Marcos Olvera-Rojas ,&nbsp;Andrea Coca-Pulido ,&nbsp;Angel Toval ,&nbsp;Isabel Martín-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Esmée A. Bakker ,&nbsp;Alessandro Sclafani ,&nbsp;Javier Fernández-Ortega ,&nbsp;Verónica Cabanas-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Jose Mora-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Manuel Gómez-Río ,&nbsp;David R Lubans ,&nbsp;Francisco B. Ortega ,&nbsp;Irene Esteban-Cornejo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the associations between muscular strength and mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We used baseline data of 91 cognitively healthy older adults (71.69 ± 3.91 years old, 57 % women) participating in the AGUEDA randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Muscular strength was assessed using both objective (i.e., handgrip strength, biceps curl, squats, and isokinetic test) and perceived (i.e., International Fitness Scale) indicators. Psychological ill-being indicators: anxiety, depression, stress, and loneliness; and psychological well-being indicators: satisfaction with life, self-esteem, and emotional well-being) were assessed using a set of valid and reliable self-reported questionnaires. Linear regression analyses were performed adjusting for sex, age, years of education, body mass index , alcohol, diet, and smoking (model 1), and additionally by cardiorespiratory fitness (model 2).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Elbow extension was positively associated with stress in model 1 (<em>β</em> = 0.252, 95 % Confidence Interval [95 % CI] = 0.007 to 0.497, <em>p</em> = 0.044), and even after further adjustment for cardiorespiratory fitness (<em>β</em> = 0.282, 95 % CI = 0.032 to 0.532, <em>p</em> = 0.028). Perceived strength was negatively associated with depressive symptoms in model 1 (<em>β</em> = -0.271, 95 % CI = -0.491 to -0.049, <em>p</em> = 0.017) and model 2 reported associations tending towards significant (<em>β</em> = -0.220, 95 % CI = -0.445 to 0.005, <em>p</em> = 0.055). Handgrip strength was positively associated with self-esteem in model 1 (<em>β</em> = 0.558, 95 % CI = 0.168 to 0.949, <em>p</em> = 0.006) and model 2 (<em>β</em> = 0.546, 95 % CI = 0.135 to 0.956, <em>p</em> = 0.010). No further associations were found among other muscular strength and mental health variables.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Handgrip had a moderate association with self-esteem and there was a small association between perceived strength with depressive symptoms and elbow extension with stress. No other associations were observed between muscular strength and mental health outcomes in cognitively normal older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47673,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260024000152/pdfft?md5=f69b529b694e92595c1c1843def957a5&pid=1-s2.0-S1697260024000152-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260024000152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine the associations between muscular strength and mental health.

Design

We used baseline data of 91 cognitively healthy older adults (71.69 ± 3.91 years old, 57 % women) participating in the AGUEDA randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Muscular strength was assessed using both objective (i.e., handgrip strength, biceps curl, squats, and isokinetic test) and perceived (i.e., International Fitness Scale) indicators. Psychological ill-being indicators: anxiety, depression, stress, and loneliness; and psychological well-being indicators: satisfaction with life, self-esteem, and emotional well-being) were assessed using a set of valid and reliable self-reported questionnaires. Linear regression analyses were performed adjusting for sex, age, years of education, body mass index , alcohol, diet, and smoking (model 1), and additionally by cardiorespiratory fitness (model 2).

Results

Elbow extension was positively associated with stress in model 1 (β = 0.252, 95 % Confidence Interval [95 % CI] = 0.007 to 0.497, p = 0.044), and even after further adjustment for cardiorespiratory fitness (β = 0.282, 95 % CI = 0.032 to 0.532, p = 0.028). Perceived strength was negatively associated with depressive symptoms in model 1 (β = -0.271, 95 % CI = -0.491 to -0.049, p = 0.017) and model 2 reported associations tending towards significant (β = -0.220, 95 % CI = -0.445 to 0.005, p = 0.055). Handgrip strength was positively associated with self-esteem in model 1 (β = 0.558, 95 % CI = 0.168 to 0.949, p = 0.006) and model 2 (β = 0.546, 95 % CI = 0.135 to 0.956, p = 0.010). No further associations were found among other muscular strength and mental health variables.

Conclusion

Handgrip had a moderate association with self-esteem and there was a small association between perceived strength with depressive symptoms and elbow extension with stress. No other associations were observed between muscular strength and mental health outcomes in cognitively normal older adults.

认知正常的老年人肌肉力量与心理健康之间的关系:AGUEDA 试验的横断面研究
方法使用客观指标(即手握力、肱二头肌卷曲、深蹲和等动测试)和感知指标(即国际体适能量表)评估肌肉力量。心理健康指标包括:焦虑、抑郁、压力和孤独感;心理幸福指标包括:生活满意度、自尊和情感幸福感。在对性别、年龄、受教育年限、体重指数、酒精、饮食和吸烟(模型 1)以及心肺功能(模型 2)进行调整后,进行了线性回归分析。结果在模型 1 中,伸肘与压力呈正相关(β = 0.252,95 % 置信区间 [95 % CI] = 0.007 至 0.497,p = 0.044),甚至在进一步调整心肺功能后也是如此(β = 0.282,95 % CI = 0.032 至 0.532,p = 0.028)。在模型 1 中,感知力量与抑郁症状呈负相关(β = -0.271,95 % CI = -0.491 至 -0.049,p = 0.017),而模型 2 则趋于显著相关(β = -0.220,95 % CI = -0.445 至 0.005,p = 0.055)。在模型 1(β = 0.558,95 % CI = 0.168 至 0.949,p = 0.006)和模型 2(β = 0.546,95 % CI = 0.135 至 0.956,p = 0.010)中,手握力与自尊呈正相关。结论:握力与自尊有一定关系,感知力量与抑郁症状和伸肘与压力之间有微小关系。在认知正常的老年人中,没有观察到肌肉力量与心理健康结果之间存在其他关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology is dedicated to publishing manuscripts with a strong emphasis on both basic and applied research, encompassing experimental, clinical, and theoretical contributions that advance the fields of Clinical and Health Psychology. With a focus on four core domains—clinical psychology and psychotherapy, psychopathology, health psychology, and clinical neurosciences—the IJCHP seeks to provide a comprehensive platform for scholarly discourse and innovation. The journal accepts Original Articles (empirical studies) and Review Articles. Manuscripts submitted to IJCHP should be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere. All signing authors must unanimously agree on the submitted version of the manuscript. By submitting their work, authors agree to transfer their copyrights to the Journal for the duration of the editorial process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信