Assessing the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer: Identifying optimal TILs cut-off value for pathologic reporting

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Krit Suwannaphoom, Sithapong Soontornsit, Kulachet Wiwatwarayos, Prapapun Seneetuntigul, Parsinee Julimasart
{"title":"Assessing the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer: Identifying optimal TILs cut-off value for pathologic reporting","authors":"Krit Suwannaphoom,&nbsp;Sithapong Soontornsit,&nbsp;Kulachet Wiwatwarayos,&nbsp;Prapapun Seneetuntigul,&nbsp;Parsinee Julimasart","doi":"10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) presents diagnostic complexities, particularly in evaluating Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. This study aimed to identify optimal TILs percentage cut-offs predictive of PD-L1 expression and to investigate the relationship between TILs, PD-L1, and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Method: Analyzing 141 TNBC cases, we assessed TILs, PD-L1 expression (clones 22C3 and SP142), and TLS presence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified TILs cut-offs (&lt;20 %, 20–60 %, ≥60 %) correlating with PD-L1 expression. TILs &lt;20 % rarely express PD-L1 with either 22C3 or SP142 clones. TILs ≥60 % demonstrate PD-L1 expression across both clones. TILs within the 20–60 % range correlate with PD-L1 expression using the SP142 clone, but not 22C3. Evaluating TILs solely at the tumor edge led to inaccuracies, highlighting the need for overall assessment of TILs throughout the entire lesion. TLS presence correlated with higher TIL percentages and PD-L1 expression, particularly with SP142. Discrepancies between 22C3 and SP142 clones (15 % vs. 50 % positivity, respectively) underscored the variability in PD-L1 detection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study identifies TILs cut-offs predictive of PD-L1 positivity, suggesting the need for institutions to tailor these thresholds based on the selected PD-L1 clone and treatment. Evaluating TILs solely at the tumor edge may overlook the complexity of tumor immune infiltration. While TLS presence correlates with higher PD-L1 expression, particularly with the SP142 clone, its exact predictive value for PD-L1 remains to be clarified. The SP142 clone exhibits higher positivity rates compared to 22C3.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50768,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 152294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1092913424000315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) presents diagnostic complexities, particularly in evaluating Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. This study aimed to identify optimal TILs percentage cut-offs predictive of PD-L1 expression and to investigate the relationship between TILs, PD-L1, and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs).

Method

Method: Analyzing 141 TNBC cases, we assessed TILs, PD-L1 expression (clones 22C3 and SP142), and TLS presence.

Results

We identified TILs cut-offs (<20 %, 20–60 %, ≥60 %) correlating with PD-L1 expression. TILs <20 % rarely express PD-L1 with either 22C3 or SP142 clones. TILs ≥60 % demonstrate PD-L1 expression across both clones. TILs within the 20–60 % range correlate with PD-L1 expression using the SP142 clone, but not 22C3. Evaluating TILs solely at the tumor edge led to inaccuracies, highlighting the need for overall assessment of TILs throughout the entire lesion. TLS presence correlated with higher TIL percentages and PD-L1 expression, particularly with SP142. Discrepancies between 22C3 and SP142 clones (15 % vs. 50 % positivity, respectively) underscored the variability in PD-L1 detection.

Conclusion

This study identifies TILs cut-offs predictive of PD-L1 positivity, suggesting the need for institutions to tailor these thresholds based on the selected PD-L1 clone and treatment. Evaluating TILs solely at the tumor edge may overlook the complexity of tumor immune infiltration. While TLS presence correlates with higher PD-L1 expression, particularly with the SP142 clone, its exact predictive value for PD-L1 remains to be clarified. The SP142 clone exhibits higher positivity rates compared to 22C3.

评估三阴性乳腺癌中肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞与 PD-L1 表达之间的关系:为病理报告确定最佳TILs临界值
背景三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的诊断非常复杂,尤其是在评估肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)和程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达方面。本研究旨在确定预测PD-L1表达的最佳TILs百分比临界值,并研究TILs、PD-L1和三级淋巴结构(TLSs)之间的关系:结果我们确定了与 PD-L1 表达相关的 TILs 临界值(<20 %、20-60 %、≥60 %)。22C3或SP142克隆的TIL很少表达PD-L1。≥60%的TIL在两个克隆中都有PD-L1表达。20%-60%范围内的TIL与SP142克隆的PD-L1表达相关,但与22C3无关。仅评估肿瘤边缘的 TIL 会导致误差,因此需要全面评估整个病灶的 TIL。TLS的存在与较高的TIL百分比和PD-L1表达相关,尤其是SP142。22C3和SP142克隆之间的差异(阳性率分别为15%和50%)突显了PD-L1检测的可变性。仅在肿瘤边缘评估 TIL 可能会忽略肿瘤免疫浸润的复杂性。虽然TLS的存在与较高的PD-L1表达相关,尤其是SP142克隆,但其对PD-L1的确切预测价值仍有待明确。与 22C3 相比,SP142 克隆表现出更高的阳性率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
149
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of articles dealing with traditional morphologic studies using standard diagnostic techniques and stressing clinicopathological correlations and scientific observation of relevance to the daily practice of pathology. Special features include pathologic-radiologic correlations and pathologic-cytologic correlations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信