How strategic alliances shape problemistic search intensity: Evidence from responses to social and historical underperformance

Abstract

Taking a social networks approach to the performance feedback model from the Behavioral Theory of the Firm (BTOF), we examine how a firm’s position within a strategic alliance network—and the structure surrounding that position—creates distinct pressures that differentially impact decision makers’ problemistic search intensity to social and historical underperformance. We test our predictions on a sample of 32,780 observations of the alliance networks of 4,726 firms and their R&D intensity from 2000–2015 and find results robust to numerous alternative specifications. Results indicate that highly centralized firms search more intensely in response to social underperformance and less intensely in response to historical underperformance. However, structural holes in the network reduce response intensity to social underperformance but increase response intensity to historical underperformance. We posit this is due to how altering one’s network cognitively shapes the perceived threat of status loss. Our study is both managerially and theoretically important, since firms increasingly rely on strategic alliances in the face of major disruptions including globalization, economic crises, and pandemics, and since strategic alliances are instrumental in shaping how firms set and respond to aspirational benchmarks.