Variability in verbal eyewitness confidence

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Pia Pennekamp, Jamal K. Mansour, Rhiannon J. Batstone
{"title":"Variability in verbal eyewitness confidence","authors":"Pia Pennekamp,&nbsp;Jamal K. Mansour,&nbsp;Rhiannon J. Batstone","doi":"10.1002/acp.4190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Typically, an eyewitness' verbal confidence is used to judge the reliability of their lineup identification. Across three experiments (<i>N</i> = 3976), we examined eyewitnesses' own words confidence in their lineup decision. For identification decisions (<i>n</i> = 1099), we identified 781 quantitatively unique responses representing 132 qualitatively unique statements that could be categorized into low, medium, and high confidence. For rejectors (<i>n</i> = 781), we identified 599 quantitatively unique responses representing 143 qualitatively unique responses that could be categorized into low, medium, and high confidence. Most participants provided a verbal phrase (e.g., pretty sure) but a significant proportion—34.19% of identifiers and 29.05% of rejectors—provided numbers (e.g., 80%). The present data highlight the variability in how confidence is expressed. The criminal justice system would benefit from guidance for interpreting verbal confidence. We provide a picture of eyewitnesses' verbal confidence as a first step.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4190","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.4190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Typically, an eyewitness' verbal confidence is used to judge the reliability of their lineup identification. Across three experiments (N = 3976), we examined eyewitnesses' own words confidence in their lineup decision. For identification decisions (n = 1099), we identified 781 quantitatively unique responses representing 132 qualitatively unique statements that could be categorized into low, medium, and high confidence. For rejectors (n = 781), we identified 599 quantitatively unique responses representing 143 qualitatively unique responses that could be categorized into low, medium, and high confidence. Most participants provided a verbal phrase (e.g., pretty sure) but a significant proportion—34.19% of identifiers and 29.05% of rejectors—provided numbers (e.g., 80%). The present data highlight the variability in how confidence is expressed. The criminal justice system would benefit from guidance for interpreting verbal confidence. We provide a picture of eyewitnesses' verbal confidence as a first step.

Abstract Image

目击证人口头信任的变异性
通常情况下,目击证人的言语信心被用来判断其列队指认的可靠性。在三次实验中(样本数= 3976),我们考察了目击证人自己对其列队指认决定的言语信心。对于辨认决定(n = 1099),我们确定了 781 个独特的定量回答,代表 132 个独特的定性陈述,可分为低、中和高信心。对于拒绝者(n = 781),我们确定了 599 个数量上唯一的回答,代表 143 个质量上唯一的回答,可分为低、中和高置信度。大多数参与者提供了一个口头短语(例如:非常肯定),但也有相当大的比例--34.19% 的识别者和 29.05% 的拒绝者提供了数字(例如:80%)。本数据凸显了信心表达方式的多变性。刑事司法系统将受益于解释口头信任的指导。作为第一步,我们提供了目击证人口头信任的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信