Acceptability, engagement and exploratory outcomes and costs of a co-designed intervention to support children of parents with a mental illness: Mixed-methods evaluation and descriptive analysis

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Annette Bauer, Javiera Cartagena-Farias, Hanna Christiansen, Melinda Goodyear, Mona Schamschula, Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss, Jean Paul
{"title":"Acceptability, engagement and exploratory outcomes and costs of a co-designed intervention to support children of parents with a mental illness: Mixed-methods evaluation and descriptive analysis","authors":"Annette Bauer,&nbsp;Javiera Cartagena-Farias,&nbsp;Hanna Christiansen,&nbsp;Melinda Goodyear,&nbsp;Mona Schamschula,&nbsp;Ingrid Zechmeister-Koss,&nbsp;Jean Paul","doi":"10.1111/inm.13324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children whose parents have a mental illness are much more likely to experience mental health problems and other adverse long-term impacts. Child-centred psychosocial interventions can be effective, but not much is known about how to design and implement them in different settings. A pre-post, mixed methods, single-arm evaluation of a co-designed social support intervention with parents and children (4–18 years) measured parents' mental health (PHQ-9), perceived social support (ENRICHD), parental self-efficacy (PSAM) and children's mental health (SDQ), quality of life (Kidscreen-27), and child service use (CAMHSRI-EU) at baseline and 6 months. Qualitative data were gathered at 6 months to explore parents' and children's experience with the intervention. Twenty-nine parents and 21 children completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires; 22 parents and 17 children participated in interviews. Parents' depression (MD −1.36, SD 8.08), perceived social support (MD 1, SD 5.91), and children's mental health potentially improved, and children's service use and costs potentially reduced (€224.6 vs. €122.2, MD 112.4). Parental self-efficacy was potentially reduced (MD −0.11, SD 3.33). The sample was too small to perform statistical analysis. Favourable themes emerged describing the high satisfaction with the intervention, parents' improved understanding of the impact of their mental health problems on children, and improvements in parent–child relationships. This study contributes to an emerging evidence base for co-designed child-centred interventions to prevent the transgenerational transmission of poor mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.13324","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.13324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children whose parents have a mental illness are much more likely to experience mental health problems and other adverse long-term impacts. Child-centred psychosocial interventions can be effective, but not much is known about how to design and implement them in different settings. A pre-post, mixed methods, single-arm evaluation of a co-designed social support intervention with parents and children (4–18 years) measured parents' mental health (PHQ-9), perceived social support (ENRICHD), parental self-efficacy (PSAM) and children's mental health (SDQ), quality of life (Kidscreen-27), and child service use (CAMHSRI-EU) at baseline and 6 months. Qualitative data were gathered at 6 months to explore parents' and children's experience with the intervention. Twenty-nine parents and 21 children completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires; 22 parents and 17 children participated in interviews. Parents' depression (MD −1.36, SD 8.08), perceived social support (MD 1, SD 5.91), and children's mental health potentially improved, and children's service use and costs potentially reduced (€224.6 vs. €122.2, MD 112.4). Parental self-efficacy was potentially reduced (MD −0.11, SD 3.33). The sample was too small to perform statistical analysis. Favourable themes emerged describing the high satisfaction with the intervention, parents' improved understanding of the impact of their mental health problems on children, and improvements in parent–child relationships. This study contributes to an emerging evidence base for co-designed child-centred interventions to prevent the transgenerational transmission of poor mental health.

Abstract Image

共同设计的干预措施的可接受性、参与度和探索性成果及成本,为父母患有精神疾病的儿童提供支持:混合方法评估和描述性分析。
父母患有精神疾病的儿童更有可能出现精神健康问题和其他长期不利影响。以儿童为中心的社会心理干预措施可能是有效的,但对于如何在不同环境下设计和实施这些干预措施却知之甚少。对一项由家长和儿童(4-18 岁)共同设计的社会支持干预措施进行了前后期、混合方法、单臂评估,在基线和 6 个月时测量了家长的心理健康(PHQ-9)、感知的社会支持(ENRICHD)、家长的自我效能(PSAM)以及儿童的心理健康(SDQ)、生活质量(Kidscreen-27)和儿童服务使用情况(CAMHSRI-EU)。我们还收集了 6 个月的定性数据,以了解家长和儿童对干预措施的体验。29 名家长和 21 名儿童填写了基线和随访问卷;22 名家长和 17 名儿童参加了访谈。结果显示,家长的抑郁程度(MD -1.36, SD 8.08)、感知到的社会支持(MD 1, SD 5.91)和儿童的心理健康状况都得到了潜在的改善,儿童使用服务的次数和费用也有可能减少(224.6 欧元对 122.2 欧元,MD 112.4)。家长的自我效能可能会降低(MD -0.11,SD 3.33)。由于样本太少,无法进行统计分析。结果显示,家长对干预措施的满意度很高,他们更加了解自己的心理健康问题对孩子的影响,亲子关系也得到了改善。这项研究为共同设计的以儿童为中心的干预措施提供了新的证据基础,以防止不良心理健康的代际传递。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信