Y Paz, K All, S Kohli, R C Plate, E Viding, R Waller
{"title":"Why Should I? Examining How Childhood Callous-Unemotional Traits Relate to Prosocial and Affiliative Behaviors and Motivations.","authors":"Y Paz, K All, S Kohli, R C Plate, E Viding, R Waller","doi":"10.1007/s10802-024-01170-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood callous-unemotional (CU) traits are characterized by low empathy, limited prosocial behavior, and restricted social affiliation. However, few studies have investigated whether CU traits are associated with different subtypes of prosocial and affiliative behavior or the specific motivational difficulties underlying these behaviors. We addressed these questions using data from 135 young children (M = 5.48 years old; 58% female) who viewed depictions of adults or children in instrumental need, emotional need, or neutral situations. We assessed recognition, suggested initiation of, and motivation for prosocial or affiliative behavior in response to each depiction. We distinguished between subtypes of prosocial (instrumental and emotional) and affiliative (parallel, cooperative, associative) behavior, as well as self- versus other-orientated motivations. Parents reported on child CU traits and conduct problems. Overall, children accurately recognized prosocial and neutral situations, offered help, and expressed other-orientated motivations for prosocial behavior and social motivations for affiliative behavior. Higher CU traits were related to lower overall recognition accuracy, which was more pronounced for emotional need. Higher CU traits were also related to fewer offers of help and more denial of prosocial behavior, particularly for instrumental need. Finally, CU traits were related to lower probability of initiating affiliative behavior. CU traits were not differentially related to self- versus other-orientated motivations for prosocial or affiliative behavior. Findings demonstrate difficulties of children with CU traits in recognizing need and offering help. Interventions for CU traits could include modules that explicitly scaffold and shape prosociality and social affiliation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1075-1087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01170-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Childhood callous-unemotional (CU) traits are characterized by low empathy, limited prosocial behavior, and restricted social affiliation. However, few studies have investigated whether CU traits are associated with different subtypes of prosocial and affiliative behavior or the specific motivational difficulties underlying these behaviors. We addressed these questions using data from 135 young children (M = 5.48 years old; 58% female) who viewed depictions of adults or children in instrumental need, emotional need, or neutral situations. We assessed recognition, suggested initiation of, and motivation for prosocial or affiliative behavior in response to each depiction. We distinguished between subtypes of prosocial (instrumental and emotional) and affiliative (parallel, cooperative, associative) behavior, as well as self- versus other-orientated motivations. Parents reported on child CU traits and conduct problems. Overall, children accurately recognized prosocial and neutral situations, offered help, and expressed other-orientated motivations for prosocial behavior and social motivations for affiliative behavior. Higher CU traits were related to lower overall recognition accuracy, which was more pronounced for emotional need. Higher CU traits were also related to fewer offers of help and more denial of prosocial behavior, particularly for instrumental need. Finally, CU traits were related to lower probability of initiating affiliative behavior. CU traits were not differentially related to self- versus other-orientated motivations for prosocial or affiliative behavior. Findings demonstrate difficulties of children with CU traits in recognizing need and offering help. Interventions for CU traits could include modules that explicitly scaffold and shape prosociality and social affiliation.
孩童时期的冷酷无情(CU)特质表现为低同理心、有限的亲社会行为和有限的社会从属关系。然而,很少有研究探讨 CU 特征是否与不同亚型的亲社会行为和从属行为相关,或这些行为背后的具体动机困难。我们利用 135 名幼儿(中=5.48 岁;58% 为女性)的数据来解决这些问题,这些幼儿观看了成人或儿童在工具需求、情感需求或中立情况下的描述。我们评估了他们对每种描述的认可度、亲社会行为或从属行为的发起和动机。我们区分了亲社会行为(工具性和情感性)和附属行为(平行、合作、关联)的子类型,以及自我导向和他人导向的动机。家长报告了儿童的 CU 特征和行为问题。总体而言,儿童能准确识别亲社会和中性情境、提供帮助,并在亲社会行为中表现出他人导向的动机,在从属行为中表现出社会动机。CU特质越高,总体识别准确率越低,这一点在情感需求方面更为明显。较高的 CU 特质还与较少主动提供帮助和更多拒绝亲社会行为有关,尤其是在工具性需求方面。最后,CU特质与发起从属行为的概率较低有关。CU特质与亲社会行为或从属行为的自我导向动机和他人导向动机的关系并无差异。研究结果表明,具有CU特质的儿童在识别需求和提供帮助方面存在困难。针对CU特质的干预措施可包括明确支持和塑造亲社会性和社会归属感的模块。