Effect of planning interventions on parent supervised oral health behaviors in primary school-age children: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Priyambadha Subba, Richa Khanna, Rajeev Kumar, Afroz Ansaari, Rameshwari Singhal, Pooja Mahour
{"title":"Effect of planning interventions on parent supervised oral health behaviors in primary school-age children: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Priyambadha Subba, Richa Khanna, Rajeev Kumar, Afroz Ansaari, Rameshwari Singhal, Pooja Mahour","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5104925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of planning interventions on self-reported changes in parents supervised oral health-related behaviors (OHRBs) and associated clinical oral health parameters for primary school-age children.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>In total, 110 parent-child pairs (children aged 3 to 8 years) were randomly assigned to either of the two groups. In the \"action planning\" group, parent participants of the pair were asked to make an \"action plan\" using the \"how, when, where\" format for their child OHRBs. In the \"implementation intention\" group, parents were asked to form an \"if-then plan\" to improve OHRBs for their child. Self-reported changes on target OHRBs, change in plaque scores, change in plaque stagnation areas, and change in caries status of tooth surfaces were observed at 2, 8, and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall OHRBs scores changed significantly from baseline to 12 weeks for both interventions. The scores were significantly better with \"if-then\" planning than \"action planning\" (z = 4, P < .001) at 12 weeks. Plaque scores also changed significantly from baseline to 12 weeks for both interventions, and improved significantly more with \"if-then\" planning (16.20 ± 5.24) than \"action planning\" (50.66 ± 11.24) at 12 weeks. The number of plaque stagnation areas also changed significantly from baseline to 12 weeks for both interventions, and improved significantly more with \"if-then\" planning at 12 weeks (12.80 ± 5.33) than \"action planning\" (42.76 ± 10.34) (t = -11.55, P < .001). There was significant change in the caries status of sound tooth surfaces with \"action planning\" at 12 weeks (z = 116.50, P = .023). There were no new caries lesions reported with \"if-then\" planning at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study observed significant improvement in OHRBs and associated oral health parameters with planning interventions, preferring \"if-then\" planning over \"action planning.\" It also elicited significant barriers to behaviors in action.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"372-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5104925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of planning interventions on self-reported changes in parents supervised oral health-related behaviors (OHRBs) and associated clinical oral health parameters for primary school-age children.

Method and materials: In total, 110 parent-child pairs (children aged 3 to 8 years) were randomly assigned to either of the two groups. In the "action planning" group, parent participants of the pair were asked to make an "action plan" using the "how, when, where" format for their child OHRBs. In the "implementation intention" group, parents were asked to form an "if-then plan" to improve OHRBs for their child. Self-reported changes on target OHRBs, change in plaque scores, change in plaque stagnation areas, and change in caries status of tooth surfaces were observed at 2, 8, and 12 weeks.

Results: Overall OHRBs scores changed significantly from baseline to 12 weeks for both interventions. The scores were significantly better with "if-then" planning than "action planning" (z = 4, P < .001) at 12 weeks. Plaque scores also changed significantly from baseline to 12 weeks for both interventions, and improved significantly more with "if-then" planning (16.20 ± 5.24) than "action planning" (50.66 ± 11.24) at 12 weeks. The number of plaque stagnation areas also changed significantly from baseline to 12 weeks for both interventions, and improved significantly more with "if-then" planning at 12 weeks (12.80 ± 5.33) than "action planning" (42.76 ± 10.34) (t = -11.55, P < .001). There was significant change in the caries status of sound tooth surfaces with "action planning" at 12 weeks (z = 116.50, P = .023). There were no new caries lesions reported with "if-then" planning at 12 weeks.

Conclusion: The study observed significant improvement in OHRBs and associated oral health parameters with planning interventions, preferring "if-then" planning over "action planning." It also elicited significant barriers to behaviors in action.

规划干预对家长监督的小学学龄儿童口腔健康行为的影响:随机对照试验。
目的方法:将 110 对亲子(儿童年龄为 3-8 岁)随机分配到两组中的一组。在 "行动规划 "组(AP)中,要求这对父母的参与者以 "如何、何时、何地 "的形式为其子女的口腔健康状况制定 "行动计划"。在 "实施意向"(IMI)组中,家长们被要求制定一个 "如果-那么计划",以改善其子女的口腔健康记录。在 2、8 和 12 周时,观察目标 OHRBs 的自我报告变化、牙菌斑得分变化、牙菌斑停滞区域变化和牙面龋齿状况变化:结果:两种干预措施的总体 OHRBs 分数从基线到 12 周均有显著变化。但 "如果-那么 "规划的得分明显高于 "行动规划"(z=4 p=结论:该研究观察到,通过规划干预,"如果-那么 "规划比 "行动规划 "在口腔健康评分和相关口腔健康参数方面有明显改善。研究还发现了行动中的重大行为障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信