Patients' Perspectives on Discontinuing Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Addiction Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1097/ADM.0000000000001292
Jessica J Wyse, Alison Eckhardt, Dylan Waller, Adam J Gordon, Sarah Shull, Travis I Lovejoy, Katherine Mackey, Benjamin J Morasco
{"title":"Patients' Perspectives on Discontinuing Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.","authors":"Jessica J Wyse, Alison Eckhardt, Dylan Waller, Adam J Gordon, Sarah Shull, Travis I Lovejoy, Katherine Mackey, Benjamin J Morasco","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Buprenorphine and other medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are recommended as standard of care in the treatment of OUD and are associated with positive health and addiction-related outcomes. Despite benefits, discontinuation is common, with half of patients discontinuing in the first year of treatment. Addressing OUD is a major clinical priority, yet little is known about the causes of medication discontinuation from the patient perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2021 to April 2022, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients who had discontinued buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD within the past 12 months. Eligible participants were selected from 2 Veterans Health Administration Health Care Systems in Oregon. Coding and analysis were guided by conventional qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty participants completed an interview; 90% were White and 90% were male, and the mean age was 54.2 years. Before discontinuation, participants had received buprenorphine for 8.3 months on average (range, 1-40 months); 80% had received buprenorphine for less than 12 months. Qualitative analysis identified the following themes relating to discontinuation: health system barriers (eg, logistical hurdles, rules and policy violations), medication effects (adverse effects; attributed adverse effects, lack of efficacy in treating chronic pain) and desire for opioid use. Patient description of decisions to discontinue buprenorphine could be multicausal, reflecting provider or system-level barriers in interaction with patient complexity or medication ambivalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study results identify several actionable ways OUD treatment could be modified to enhance patient retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Buprenorphine and other medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are recommended as standard of care in the treatment of OUD and are associated with positive health and addiction-related outcomes. Despite benefits, discontinuation is common, with half of patients discontinuing in the first year of treatment. Addressing OUD is a major clinical priority, yet little is known about the causes of medication discontinuation from the patient perspective.

Methods: From March 2021 to April 2022, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients who had discontinued buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD within the past 12 months. Eligible participants were selected from 2 Veterans Health Administration Health Care Systems in Oregon. Coding and analysis were guided by conventional qualitative content analysis.

Results: Twenty participants completed an interview; 90% were White and 90% were male, and the mean age was 54.2 years. Before discontinuation, participants had received buprenorphine for 8.3 months on average (range, 1-40 months); 80% had received buprenorphine for less than 12 months. Qualitative analysis identified the following themes relating to discontinuation: health system barriers (eg, logistical hurdles, rules and policy violations), medication effects (adverse effects; attributed adverse effects, lack of efficacy in treating chronic pain) and desire for opioid use. Patient description of decisions to discontinue buprenorphine could be multicausal, reflecting provider or system-level barriers in interaction with patient complexity or medication ambivalence.

Conclusions: Study results identify several actionable ways OUD treatment could be modified to enhance patient retention.

患者对停用丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的看法。
目标:丁丙诺啡和其他治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的药物被推荐为治疗 OUD 的标准护理方法,并与积极的健康和成瘾相关结果有关。尽管疗效显著,但停药现象却很普遍,半数患者在接受治疗的第一年就停药了。解决 OUD 问题是临床工作的重中之重,但从患者角度来看,他们对停药的原因知之甚少:从 2021 年 3 月到 2022 年 4 月,我们对过去 12 个月内停用丁丙诺啡治疗 OUD 的患者进行了定性访谈。符合条件的参与者来自俄勒冈州的两个退伍军人健康管理局医疗保健系统。编码和分析以传统的定性内容分析为指导:20 名参与者完成了访谈;90% 为白人,90% 为男性,平均年龄为 54.2 岁。在停药前,参与者接受丁丙诺啡治疗的时间平均为 8.3 个月(范围为 1-40 个月);80% 的参与者接受丁丙诺啡治疗的时间少于 12 个月。定性分析确定了以下与停药有关的主题:医疗系统障碍(如后勤障碍、违反规则和政策)、药物影响(不良反应;归因于不良反应、缺乏治疗慢性疼痛的疗效)以及对阿片类药物使用的渴望。患者对停用丁丙诺啡的决定的描述可能是多方面的,反映了提供者或系统层面的障碍与患者的复杂性或用药矛盾的相互作用:研究结果确定了几种可操作的方法,可对 OUD 治疗进行修改,以提高患者保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信